Welcome back to the Former Adventists Philippines Blog, brothers and sisters! Kumusta kayo? If you have ever sat inside a Sabbath School class wondering why a study on ancient Hebrew kings and prophets somehow always ends up at a farm in 19th-century Maine, this week’s review is for you.
Today, we are walking through Sabbath School Lesson 3 (October 10–16), titled Old Testament Prophets. If you peek at the Teachers Comments at the back of the quarterly, the authors openly admit the real agenda for the week: the entire study of Old Testament prophetic ministry is designed as a backdrop to help church members accept the prophetic authority of Ellen G. White.
Let’s examine this lesson day by day using sound biblical exegesis, standard hermeneutics, and the clear lenses of New Covenant Theology.
Sabbath Afternoon: The "Heavenly GPS" and the Bait-and-Switch
What the Lesson Claims:
The introduction uses a comparison from 2 Chronicles 20:20, where King Jehoshaphat urges Judah to trust the Lord to be established and trust His prophets to succeed, and likens Old Testament prophets to a spiritual Global Positioning System (GPS) that guides believers toward heaven. It immediately emphasizes that these prophets were fragile, ordinary people who battled fear, anger, discouragement, and hard lives just like us.
In the historical context of 2 Chronicles 20, Jehoshaphat was not laying down a timeless requirement that every generation must have a denominational visionary in order to prosper. Judah was facing an invading coalition of Moabites and Ammonites, and a Levite named Jahaziel gave a specific, one-time prophetic assurance that God would win that specific battle without Judah even needing to fight. Under New Covenant Theology, we no longer rely on an Old Covenant prophetic office as our "heavenly GPS". As Hebrews 1:1–2 declares, God spoke in various ways through the prophets in the past, but in these last days He has spoken to us finally and fully in His Son, Jesus Christ! Today, every born-again believer has the indwelling Holy Spirit and the completed apostolic Scriptures to guide them into all truth (John 16:13; 2 Timothy 3:16–17).
The lesson equates the canonical prophets of Israel with modern extra-biblical leadership, while preemptively lowering the standard of prophetic reliability by stressing how fragile and mistake-prone prophets were as human beings.
The lesson equates the canonical prophets of Israel with modern extra-biblical leadership, while preemptively lowering the standard of prophetic reliability by stressing how fragile and mistake-prone prophets were as human beings.
If Jesus Christ is the final Word of God and the Holy Spirit already lives inside every believer under the New Covenant, why does a church still need a 19th-century mediator to act as its spiritual GPS?
Sunday, October 11: The Humanity of Prophets (Elijah’s Burnout)
What the Lesson Claims:
Looking at James 5:17–18 and 1 Kings 18–19, the lesson contrasts Elijah’s dramatic victory calling down fire on Mount Carmel with his deep despair in the wilderness when he asked God to end his life. It suggests Elijah was battling depression and feeling like a ministerial failure because Israel remained in apostasy despite his zeal for the covenant, proving he had a frail human nature just like ours.
When James 5:17–18 mentions that Elijah shared our human nature, James is not making excuses for prophetic blunders; he is encouraging ordinary Christians that our fervent prayers are powerful and effective! Furthermore, from a Biblical perspective, 1 Kings 19 is a beautiful picture of how God’s prevenient and sustaining grace meets human weakness. God did not coerce Elijah or crush him for being exhausted; He gave him sleep, food, a gentle whisper, and a renewed commission so Elijah could freely cooperate with God’s calling again.
Notice how Elijah cried out that he was the only faithful believer left in the entire nation. How did God respond in 1 Kings 19:18? God gently corrected Elijah’s gloomy "remnant defeatism" by telling him that He had reserved 7,000 people who had not bowed to Baal! Seventh-day Adventism loves to camp inside Elijah’s cave, teaching that the whole world is going to the dogs and only a tiny, persecuted Sabbath-keeping remnant is left. The Bible embraces God’s correction of Elijah: Christ’s kingdom is not a shrinking bunker; it is a growing mountain and leaven that steadily transforms the nations until the earth is full of the knowledge of the Lord!
By focusing heavily on Elijah’s emotional exhaustion after a real miracle, the lesson distracts readers from the real issue: emotional tiredness is completely different from teaching false doctrine or making failed predictions in God's name.
Does the fact that Elijah got tired and discouraged after calling down real fire from heaven excuse Ellen White whose early visions taught that the door of salvation shut for the world in 1844?
Monday, October 12: Identifying True Prophets
What the Lesson Claims:
Citing Deuteronomy 18:20, 1 Kings 22:1–14, and 1 Samuel 9:3–14, the lesson explains that true prophets faithfully delivered God’s messages even when it made them hated by rulers like King Ahab, as seen when Micaiah stood alone against 400 false prophets. It also points to Samuel as an honorable man of God, while quickly adding a disclaimer that being a prophet does not make a person flawless.
Why did the author slip the "prophets aren't flawless" disclaimer right into the middle of a lesson titled Identifying True Prophets? Because in Deuteronomy 18:20–22, the Old Covenant test of a prophet had zero tolerance for error: if a single prediction failed to come to pass, that person was a presumptuous false prophet and faced the death penalty! Now, let’s look at this through a Scriptural lens. We believe the spiritual gift of prophecy did not die out; it continues in the New Covenant church today (1 Corinthians 12:10; 14:1–3). However, New Covenant prophecy functions very differently from Old Testament covenant prosecutors like Samuel or Micaiah. Under the New Covenant, prophecy is given to strengthen, encourage, and comfort the body (1 Corinthians 14:3), and Paul explicitly commands the congregation to weigh and test every prophetic word (1 Corinthians 14:29; 1 Thessalonians 5:20–21). Why? Because New Covenant believers prophesy in part (1 Corinthians 13:9). Adventism commits a massive category error: it demands Old Testament canonical submission to Ellen White when enforcing church conformity, yet pleads New Testament human fallibility whenever historians expose her contradictions!
The lesson sets up the biblical standard of accurate transmission of truth, but immediately shifts the goalposts to personal human imperfection so that the church's favorite prophetess cannot be disqualified by the very biblical tests cited in the Teachers Comments.
If New Covenant prophecy is meant to be weighed, tested, and sifted by ordinary believers in the local church, why does the Seventh-day Adventist Fundamental Belief #18 elevate one woman’s writings to an authoritative source of truth that cannot be questioned?
Tuesday, October 13: Functions of Prophets
What the Lesson Claims:
Reviewing 1 Samuel 8:4–22 and Leviticus 8:10–13, Tuesday’s study highlights how prophets interacted with kings and priests. It notes that Samuel warned Israel against demanding a king to copy the surrounding nations, that Moses anointed Aaron’s priesthood, and that a primary duty of the prophets was calling unfaithful kings and corrupt priests back to obeying God’s law, while also delivering messages regarding God’s plan for the Gentile nations in passages like Isaiah 60:1–3 and 62:1–2.
The Teachers Comments rightly note that Old Testament prophets like Elijah acted as "covenant prosecutors" calling Israel back to the Mosaic Law. That is 100% true for the Old Covenant! Israel was a geopolitical theocracy under the Sinai Charter. When the king or the Levitical priests broke the Mosaic Law, God sent His prosecutors to enforce the terms of the Sinai treaty. But under New Covenant Theology, the Old Covenant, with its earthly kings, Levitical priests, and stone tablets of the Mosaic Law, has been fulfilled and rendered obsolete by the death and resurrection of Jesus (2 Corinthians 3:6–11; Hebrews 7:12; 8:13). Jesus is our eternal Prophet, Priest, and King! We are under the Law of Christ (Galatians 6:2; 1 Corinthians 9:21), not the jurisdiction of a Sinai prosecutor dragging us back under the shadow of Moses.
Look at the two cross-references Tuesday mentions in passing: Isaiah 60:1–3 and Isaiah 62:1–2. Go read those chapters in your Bible! Isaiah prophesies that the Gentile nations will walk to the light of Zion, kings will bring their wealth into the Kingdom, and the righteousness of God’s people will shine out like a blazing torch until all nations see His salvation. This is the glorious victory of the Great Commission in history, not an end-time scenario where the whole world unites to pass a Sunday Law against Adventists!
Reading Old Covenant theocratic enforcement back into the New Covenant church age, as if Christians are still living under the terms of ancient national Israel.
Since Jesus Christ has already fulfilled the Mosaic Covenant and serves as our perfect Prophet, High Priest, and King in heaven, why would the New Covenant church need a Sinai-style "covenant prosecutor" to police our diet, dress, and Sabbath-keeping?
Wednesday, October 14: Women Prophets
What the Lesson Claims:
Looking at Exodus 15:20, Judges 4:4, 2 Kings 22:14, and Luke 2:36, Wednesday points out that God called women such as Miriam, Deborah, Huldah, and Anna to serve as prophets. It notes Miriam’s worship leadership after the Red Sea alongside her moral failure when criticizing Moses and his wife in Numbers 12, Deborah’s role as judge, and King Josiah consulting Huldah when the Book of the Law was rediscovered in the temple, concluding once again that both male and female prophets were sinners needing grace.
As Christians, we wholeheartedly celebrate that God calls and empowers women with the gift of prophecy! From Miriam, Deborah, and Huldah in the Old Testament to Anna, Philip’s four unmarried daughters (Acts 21:9), and the women praying and prophesying in Corinth (1 Corinthians 11:5), the Spirit pours out gifts on both sons and daughters (Acts 2:17–18). Nobody in our community rejects Ellen White simply because she was a woman! We reject her prophetic claims because her doctrines contradict the Gospel of grace.
Look closely at Huldah’s prophecy in 2 Kings 22:11–20 and 2 Chronicles 34:22–28. As the Teachers Comments explain, Huldah confirmed that the covenant curses of Deuteronomy 28 were about to fall on Jerusalem because of Judah’s persistent idolatry, and she introduced zero new doctrinal truths. Huldah’s oracle had a real, concrete historical fulfillment in her generation’s horizon when Babylon destroyed Jerusalem in 586 BC, just as Jesus’ prophecy in Matthew 24 had a concrete historical fulfillment when Rome destroyed Jerusalem in AD 70. Contrast Huldah with Ellen White: while Huldah introduced no new doctrines, Ellen White’s visions were used to canonize a brand-new doctrine, the 1844 Investigative Judgment, that undermined the finished cross of Christ!
Arguing that because the Bible features genuine female prophets who had human flaws (like Miriam) or advised leaders (like Huldah), therefore any modern female claimant with flaws is equally called by God.
If the Teachers Comments praise Huldah because her prophetic ministry never introduced a single new doctrine to Israel, why does Adventism rely on Ellen White’s visions to defend unique doctrines like the 1844 pre-advent investigative judgment that no Christian in history ever found in the Bible alone?
Thursday, October 15: False Prophets
What the Lesson Claims:
Focusing on Jeremiah 14:1–15, Jeremiah 23, Ezekiel 13, and 1 Kings 22, Thursday warns that Satan always raises up counterfeits. While Jeremiah warned Judah of imminent war, famine, and plague, false prophets spoke comforting lies out of their own deceitful minds without being sent by God. It also revisits Ahab’s 400 prophets of Asherah pressuring Micaiah to join the popular consensus, concluding that following popular culture is always dangerous.
In Jeremiah 14, why was it a lie for the false prophets to preach peace and safety? Because Babylonian armies were literally marching toward Jerusalem to execute the covenant curses of the Mosaic Law! We recognize that Old Covenant warnings of national destruction by sword, famine, and pestilence were historically fulfilled against apostate Judah and Jerusalem (first in 586 BC, and finally in AD 70). Yet, in Adventist culture, passages like Jeremiah 14 and 1 Kings 22 are weaponized to create paranoia against historic evangelical Christianity. Whenever a gospel preacher shares the comforting truth that our sins are fully forgiven at the cross and we have complete assurance of salvation in Christ, legalistic systems label that "popular false peace." Meanwhile, look at Jeremiah 14:14’s actual definition of false prophets: people who claim visions from the Lord when the Lord never sent them or spoke to them, prophesying out of the imagination of their own minds!
Implying that if a religious message is unpopular or counter-cultural, it must be heroic truth like Micaiah’s, whereas comforting messages of peace and assurance are automatically suspect as majority-rule compromises.
When William Miller and the early pioneer circle predicted that Jesus would return in October 1844,and then claimed for seven years afterward that the door of mercy was shut to the entire world, were they speaking words commanded by Yahweh, or visions out of their own hearts as described in Jeremiah 14:14?
Friday, October 16 & Teachers Comments: Not Perfect, But Willing (The Grand Reveal)
What the Lesson Claims:
Friday’s conclusion and the accompanying Teachers Comments finally lay all their cards on the table. The lesson asserts that Ellen Harmon (White) experienced the exact same anxieties as Old Testament prophets: at age 17, in poor health and shy, she initially wished for death rather than accepting her visionary burden after December 1844. The Teachers Comments recount her testimony of a ball of fiery light striking her and taking away her strength, along with a warning that she would be afflicted with sickness if she ever fell into pride. It praises her for simply calling herself the Lord’s "messenger" rather than claiming the title of prophet, while celebrating her 100,000 pages of inspired writings and her foundational role in organizing the SDA Church in 1860–1863 to proclaim the three angels’ messages.
Look at how the Teachers Comments cite Deuteronomy 18:15–19, Moses’ promise that Yahweh would raise up a prophet like him from among their brothers, as the pattern that explains Ellen White’s prophetic role. Brothers and sisters, open your New Testaments to Acts 3:22–23 and Acts 7:37! Both the Apostle Peter and Stephen explicitly identify the Prophet of Deuteronomy 18:15–19 as the Lord Jesus Christ! To take a Messianic prophecy pointing to the divine Son of God and use it as a template to validate a 19th-century founder is a breathtaking violation of christocentric hermeneutics.
Consider the psychological and spiritual dynamics described in the Teachers Comments: a traumatized, sickly 17-year-old girl terrified after the Great Disappointment of 1844, wishing she were dead, being knocked weak by a ball of fire, and being told she will be struck with physical illness if she ever becomes proud. God’s grace is restorative, liberating, and rooted in love (1 John 4:18, perfect love casts out fear!). The Holy Spirit cultivates humility as a fruit of the Spirit through inner transformation, not by threatening a fragile teenager with chronic sickness! Moreover, claiming she humbly avoided the title of "prophet" by calling herself a "messenger" is a distinction without a difference when the very same lesson calls her 100,000 pages "inspired writings" on par with the prophetic gift of Elijah and Samuel.
Friday credits her ministry with rallying the fledgling denomination around the three angels’ messages of Revelation 14. Revelation 14 had nothing to do with William Miller’s failed 1844 math or the organization of a church in Battle Creek, Michigan in 1863. John was writing to first-century churches about the imminent judgment of apostate first-century Jerusalem ("Babylon the Great," the harlot city that shed the blood of the prophets) and the beastly persecution of the Roman Empire, events that were wrapping up shortly in that generation (Revelation 1:1, 3; 22:10).
The lesson authors pick out common human experiences, being shy, reluctant, physically sick, or facing criticism, and paint a prophetic bullseye around them, while completely ignoring the theological disqualifiers: unfulfilled predictions (such as her 1856 vision predicting that some conference attendees would be translated to heaven without seeing death), heavy uncredited literary borrowing, and teachings that place a veil of fear between the believer and the finished cross of Christ.
If someone walks like a canonical prophet, claims 100,000 pages of divine inspiration like a prophet, and has an entire week’s Sabbath School lesson comparing her to Moses, Elijah, and Samuel, does calling herself a "messenger" actually show humility, or does it just shield her from the biblical tests of a prophet?
Three Mic-Drop Cross-Examination Questions for Your Sabbath School Class
If you are discussing this lesson with Adventist friends, family members, or your local Sabbath School class, here are three polite but piercing cross-examination questions you can ask:
1. The Deuteronomy 18 Accuracy Test vs. The "Human Frailty" Excuse:
"Since the Teachers Comments on page 40 state that Deuteronomy 18:21–22 requires a true prophet’s predictions to be fulfilled and never contradict God’s established Word, why does the daily lesson spend all week emphasizing that prophets are flawed humans who make mistakes? Were Elijah, Samuel, or Huldah ever allowed to give a single false prediction or teach a single unbiblical doctrine in the name of the Lord and blame it on 'human frailty'?"
2. The Huldah Standard of "No New Doctrine":
"On page 41, the Teachers Comments praise the prophetess Huldah because her message 'did not introduce new doctrinal truths,' but simply applied existing Scripture. By that exact biblical standard, why did the pioneers use Ellen White’s visions to ratify the 1844 Investigative Judgment and initially defend the 'Shut Door', doctrines that cannot be sustained from plain exegesis of Scripture alone?"
3. Hebrews 1:1–2 and the Finality of Jesus:
"Sabbath Afternoon’s lesson says we need a heavenly GPS today just like Israel had through the Old Testament prophets. Yet Hebrews 1:1–2 says that while God spoke through the prophets in the past, in these last days He has spoken to us in His Son, and 1 Corinthians 14:29 says any prophetic word in the church today must be weighed and judged by the congregation. Why are we going backward to Moses and Elijah to build an unquestionable prophetic authority around Ellen White, when the New Covenant says Jesus is the final Word and every believer already has the Holy Spirit?"
Stay grounded in grace! You don’t need an extra-biblical mediator or an Old Covenant prosecutor when you have the risen Savior, the completed Word of God, and the indwelling Spirit of adoption crying out, "Abba, Father!"
FORMER ADVENTISTS PHILIPPINES
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
Partner with me in advancing this ministry. Be part of this mission! Your support helps us continue gospel-centered outreach and resources.
• GCash: 0969-514-3944
• PayPal: paypal.me/formeradventistsph
• Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
No comments:
Post a Comment