Investigating Adventism: The Logic of Contradiction Examined A Point-by-Point Response to the SDA Infographic on the Sabbath, the Shadow, and Moral Law

We examine each argument of the SDA infographic using Scripture, SDA’s own scholarship, and evangelical New Covenant Theology showing that the infographic’s logic contradicts itself.

Overall Verdict

The SDA infographic “The Logic of Contradiction” uses reductio ad absurdum to defend the Seventh-day Sabbath as an eternal moral obligation. But this strategy involves a fundamental category error : it lumps the Fourth Commandment (regarding the day of rest) with the remaining nine commandments that clearly address universal ethical standards. The failure to separate the covenant-context of the Sabbath from the inherent moral truth weakens the entire argument.

New Covenant Theology Perspective

Under New Covenant Theology (NCT) , the Ten Commandments as a covenant document are part of the Old Testament that has been abolished (2 Cor. 3:7–11; Heb. 8:13). Their moral content is re-expressed under the New Testament with the exception of the Fourth Commandment. The Sabbath is purely a covenant-sign of Israel (Ex. 31:13–17), not a universal moral law. The NCT view provides a more robust answer than the simple Moral/Ceremonial interpretation of the SDA.

#1. SDA Claim: "Rest in Christ is only spiritual" Does that mean that love for parents is also 'spiritual'?

SDA argument

"If we say that rest is "spiritual" in Christ, we must also say that the commandment to honor father and mother is "spiritual." So the Sabbath cannot be merely spiritual without the other commandments being removed."

Objection: Category Error

The argument implies that all the Ten Commandments are of the same kind and nature . But this is not true. Nine of the ten commandments refer to natural moral truths embedded in the image of God in man ( imago Dei ) valid even without Sinai. The commandment to “honor your father and mother” is present in every culture because it is natural. The Sabbath is unique it is a specific covenant-sign given by God to Israel (Exodus 31:13–17), not a natural moral law.

"Speak to the children of Israel: You must keep my Sabbaths, for it is a sign between me and you throughout your generations..." Exodus 31:13 (emphasis added)

Scholarly Note: said Dr. Thomas Schreiner (Reformed Baptist, Southern Seminary): "The Sabbath, unlike the other nine commandments, is not repeated as a command in the New Testament epistles. This is significant it suggests its unique covenantal, rather than universal moral, character." (40 Questions about Christians and Biblical Law , 2010)

Logical Conclusion

The statement that rest has been fulfilled in Christ (Heb. 4:1–10; Matt. 11:28–30) does not remove the obligation to honor parents, because the two are different kinds of commandments. The commandment regarding parents is a natural moral truth that is restated in the New Testament (Eph. 6:1–3). The Sabbath is not restated as a commandment in the Epistles to the Gentile churches.

Verdict: Argument Fails Reductio involves a false equivalence. Not all commandments in the Decalogue have the same covenantal character. The Sabbath is an exclusive covenantal sign of Israel  constructed separately from the natural moral law.

#2. SDA Claim: "Jesus is our Sabbath" Is He also our "Thou shalt not steal"?

SDA argument

A “Person” cannot replace a “Principle” of the law. If Jesus is the Sabbath, then it must also be said that Jesus is “Thou shalt not steal.” This does not make sense.

Objection: Typology is Not Replacement

It is true that a Person cannot literally replace a Principle but this is not what the NCT teaches. The point is that the Sabbath typologically points to Christ (Colossians 2:17) it is a “shadow” of the reality which is Christ. “Thou shalt not steal” is not typological ; it is a direct moral command restated in the New Testament (Eph. 4:28). The Sabbath, in contrast, specifically points to God’s rest at Creation (Gen. 2) which is fulfilled in the rest of salvation in Christ (Heb. 4).

"These things are a shadow of the things to come, but the body belongs to Christ." Colossians 2:17

"Come to me, all you who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest." Matthew 11:28

Scholarly Note: From the SDA Scholar himself SDA theologian Samuele Bacchiocchi in Divine Rest for Human Restlessness admits that the "rest of God in Genesis 2 points forward typologically"  which itself recognizes the typological dimension of the Sabbath, though he reaches a different conclusion.

Logical Conclusion

“Thou shalt not steal” has no typological fulfillment it is a continuous and direct moral command. The Sabbath has a unique typological structure that points to Christ’s rest, so the two cannot be equally compared. 

The SDA argument turns against them: the uniqueness of the Sabbath proves that it is covenant-filled, not simply a moral command.

Verdict: Argument Fails The comparison is false because the Sabbath has a typological quality that no other commandment has. Its fulfillment in Christ is not a "taking away" it is the fulfillment of the covenant purpose.

#3. SDA Claim: Colossians 2:16–17 "The Sabbath is only a shadow and therefore does not include the Fourth Commandment"

SDA argument

"According to the SDA: the "sabbath days" in Col. 2:16 refers only to the ceremonial Sabbaths (Passover, Pentecost, Atonement) and not to the Seventh-day Sabbath. The SDA Bible Commentary itself supports this."

Objection: The Word "Sabbath" Is Clear Enough

Even if we accept this SDA interpretation, our argument becomes even stronger . If the "sabbath days" here refer to ceremonial Sabbaths, it shows that Paul was careful in his use of terminology. But the common use of σαββάτων (sabbaton) in the NT covers all Sabbaths, including weekly ones. The more important question: why did Paul ask the Colossians to leave the judgment of others about Sabbaths if it was still a moral obligation?

"Let no one judge you in food or drink, or in respect of a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath day which are a shadow of things to come, but the body belongs to Christ." Colossians 2:16–17

Scholarly Note: Douglas Moo (Reformed) "The phrase 'a festival, new moon or sabbath' in Col. 2:16 reflects a standard OT formula (cf. 1 Chron. 23:31; 2 Chron. 2:4; Hos. 2:11) that encompasses the entire Jewish calendar system weekly sabbaths included." (The Letter to the Colossians, Pillar Commentary, 2008)

Additional Point: Romans 14:5

In Romans 14:5, Paul says: “One man esteems one day above another, and another esteems all days alike.” The context is not just about food it includes special days. If the Fourth Commandment were a moral obligation like “You shall not murder,” why would Paul allow a Christian to treat every day as equal? ​​He did not allow for differences of opinion on murder or adultery.

Verdict: Argument Fails: The SDA acceptance that Col. 2:16 is ceremonial further confirms the typological nature of the Sabbath system. And Romans 14:5 gives freedom on days that could not be given if it were a moral command.

#4. SDA Claim: Hebrews 4:9 "There remains a Sabbath-keeping for the people of God" = literal Saturday

SDA argument

The word "sabbatismos" in Hebrews 4:9 literally means "Sabbath-keeping." That is, literal observance of the Sabbath remains a commandment for Christians.

Objection: The Context Speaks of Eschatological Rest

Sabbatismos (ἀπολείπεται σαββατισμὸς) is a unique word used only once in the entire New Testament . The argument of the author of Hebrews (chs. 3–4) is:

(1) Joshua’s rest in the promised land was not the true rest (4:8),
(2) the Creation Seventh day points to a greater rest (4:4–5), 

(3) the rest is eschatological fulfilled in faith (4:3) and in future glory (4:11). The point is not to “keep Sabbath every Saturday” but to “enter into true rest through faith in Christ.”

"For he who enters His rest also rests from his own works, as God did from His." Hebrews 4:10

Scholarly Note: F.F. Bruce: "The 'sabbath-rest' of Heb. 4:9 is not an argument for literal sabbath observance but a typological fulfillment the antitype of all the sabbaths of Israel, realized in the eschatological rest of God's people." (The Epistle to the Hebrews , NICNT, 1964)

Logical Conclusion

If Hebrews 4:9 is a command for literal Sabbath observance, SDA must also explain why the entire argument of Hebrews 3–4 focuses on faith as the means of entering into rest not on being careful about the day of the week. The “sabbath rest” of Hebrews 4 is greater and deeper than the weekly Sabbath it is the rest of salvation itself.

Verdict: Argument Fails: Hebrews 4 is eschatological and typological, not a command for literal Sabbath observance. "Sabbatismos" refers to the fulfillment of all Sabbath-typology in Christ not a weekly calendar.

#5. SDA Claim: "The Sabbath is just a shadow, so it is SEMI-ARIAN/ANTI-TRINITARIAN" false conclusion

SDA argument

"The statement that "the Sabbath is only a shadow" implies that the prohibition against adultery or murder is also a "shadow" that the consequences of immoral acts will still be obtained. Immorality would become legal if the law were removed."

Objection: Wrong Equation

The argument equates the Sabbath (covenant-sign) with the prohibitions on adultery and murder (natural moral law). This is the main category error of the entire infographic. The NCT clearly teaches: the moral law was not abolished it was re-stated under the New Covenant (cf. Rom. 13:8–10; Gal. 5:14). The prohibitions on adultery and murder remain fully valid without the need for Sabbath observance . The two are not related.

"He who loves his neighbor has fulfilled the law... These commandments: 'You shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder'... are summed up in this commandment: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself.'" Romans 13:8–9

The Semi-Arian Accusation

The pairing of "non-sabbatarian = Semi-Arian" is a non sequitur and ad hominem argument. There is no logical connection between being non-sabbatarian and rejecting the Trinitarian. The vast majority of Trinitarian Reformed and Evangelical theologians Calvin, Luther, Owen, Schreiner, Carson did not keep a literal Sabbath. The accusation is rhetorical, not theological.

Verdict: Argument Fails: The moral law remains valid under the NCT but not because of the Sabbath but because it is re-expressed in love (Romans 13:8–10). The Semi-Arian accusation is merely rhetorical, without theological basis.

#6. SDA Claim: "Every day is the same" Does that mean all women are the same?

SDA argument

"If "all days are the same" (Romans 14:5), does that mean that all women are also "the same" and can be considered wives? The setting apart (sanctification) of something is necessary for order."

Objection: False Analogy

The analogy begins with a false premise. Romans 14:5 is about religious days fast days and Jewish feast days which are not like people. The sanctification of the spouse does not come from the Fourth Commandment; it comes from the institution of marriage (Gen. 2:24; Eph. 5:22–33) which is separate and distinct from itself . The exploitation of the analogy demonstrates the weakness of the argument.

"One man esteems one day above another; another esteems all days alike. Let each man be fully convinced in his own mind." Romans 14:5

About the First Day of the Week

SDAs say there is no NT command for Sunday worship. True but there is significant evidence of apostolic practice : Acts 20:7 (meeting on the first day), 1 Cor. 16:2, Rev. 1:10 ("Lord's Day"). The Didache (c. 50–120 AD) and Justin Martyr (150 AD) clearly teach meeting on the first day of the week. Sunday worship is apostolic, not just Roman.

Verdict: Argument Fails: The analogy of "all women are the same" is a false comparison. Romans 14:5 gives freedom regarding religious days a freedom that cannot be given if the Sabbath is a moral obligation like the prohibition against murder.

The Key Difference: NCT Perspective

The most critical mistake of the SDA infographic is the use of simple Moral Law/Ceremonial Law procreation. Under the NCT, procreation is more accurate:

✓ Law Restated in the NT: Thou shalt not kill (Romans 13:9)

• Do not commit adultery (Romans 13:9)
• Thou shalt not steal (Eph. 4:28)
• Honor your parents (Eph. 6:1–3)
• Do not lie (Col. 3:9)
• Worship God alone (1 Cor. 8:4)

✗ Not Restated in the NT: Fourth Commandment Sabbath (Col. 2:16–17)

• Ceremonial Sabbaths
• Food and drink (Col. 2:16)
• Holidays and new moons
• Annual Sabbath (Lev. 23)
• Jubilee and Sabbatical years

The measurement is not Moral vs. Ceremonial but is it restated in the NT or not? Only the Sabbath of the Ten Commandments is not restated as a commandment in the New Testament.

The Final Word

1. "The Logic of Contradiction" is well-designed but has a major flaw: it assumes that all the Ten Commandments are of the same covenant-nature. This is not what Scripture teaches.
   
   
2. The Fourth Commandment is unique: it is a covenant-sign of Israel (Ex. 31:13–17), has a typological fulfillment in Christ (Heb. 4; Col. 2:17), and is not restated as a commandment in the New Testament for the Gentile Church.
   
   
3. The moral standard remains: not because of the Sabbath, but because of the love of God and neighbor (Rom. 13:8–10; Gal. 5:14) written by the Spirit in our hearts (Heb. 8:10; Jer. 31:33).
   
   
4. God’s rest is not a calendar day: it is a Person: Jesus Christ himself (Matthew 11:28–30).

Former Adventists Philippines

​“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Former Adventists Philippines Association, Inc
SEC Registration No: 2025090219381-03

Help keep this content free for everyone. I am committed to sharing these truths and resources freely. If you have found value in my articles since 2021 and would like to partner with me in this ministry, your support on Ko-fi would be greatly appreciated. It helps cover the costs of maintaining this blog and creating new content.

❤️ Partner with me on Ko-fi
https://ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
Gcash# 09695143944 

PayPal: paypal.me/formeradventistsph

Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos