ARE THE SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS THE
REMNANT CHURCH OF REVELATION 14:12?
A Partial Preterist Refutation of the
SDA Claim from Revelation 14:12
Historico-Grammatical Exegesis | Hebrew & Greek Word Studies | Logical Fallacy Analysis
HERMENEUTICAL
FRAMEWORK: WHY PARTIAL PRETERISM MATTERS HERE
|
What
is Partial Preterism? Partial Preterism is the hermeneutical position held by
scholars such as Kenneth Gentry (Before Jerusalem Fell), R.C. Sproul (The
Last Days According to Jesus), Gary DeMar, James Stuart Russell (The
Parousia), and the early church father Eusebius that the majority of the
predictive prophecies in Revelation were fulfilled in the first century A.D.,
primarily in the context of: (1) the Roman Imperial persecution of the Church
under Nero (A.D. 54–68), and (2) the destruction of Jerusalem and the Jewish
Temple by Titus in A.D. 70. Partial Preterism is 'partial' because it does not apply
preterist fulfillment to everything the Second Coming, the general
resurrection, and the final judgment remain future (contra
Full/Hyper-Preterism). But the bulk of Revelation chapters 6–19 including
the Three Angels' Messages of Revelation 14 had their primary referent in
the first-century crisis of Rome, Babylon, and apostate Judaism. The
devastating implication for the SDA Remnant claim: If Revelation 14:12 was addressed to first-century
believers under Roman imperial pressure describing their patient endurance
amid the beast's (Nero's) persecution then it cannot simultaneously be a
prophetic fingerprint pointing forward to a denomination that would not exist
for another eighteen centuries. The SDA Remnant claim requires Revelation
14:12 to be entirely unfulfilled and entirely future. Partial Preterism
demolishes that presupposition at the foundation. |
THE SDA
ARGUMENT
|
SDA Position: "The Seventh-day Adventist Church is the Remnant
Church prophesied in Revelation 14:12 and 12:17 the end-time movement that
keeps the commandments of God (including the Saturday Sabbath, the Seal of
God) and holds the testimony of Jesus, fulfilled through Ellen G. White's
prophetic ministry. No other denomination meets these marks. Therefore the
SDA Church alone is God's true Remnant in the last days." Key
Texts Claimed: Revelation 14:6–12;
12:17; 19:10; Daniel 8:14; Revelation 18:4 |
POINT 1:
REVELATION 14:12 HAS A FIRST-CENTURY AUDIENCE IT IS NOT A 19TH-CENTURY
PROPHETIC FINGERPRINT
|
Partial
Preterist Exegesis of Revelation 14:12 The First-Century Context: Revelation 1:1 (NKJV): "The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave Him
to show His servants things which must shortly take place (en
tachei)." The Greek en tachei means 'with speed / shortly / soon.' This
is not 'soon' in some stretched cosmic sense of 1,000 years. In normal
first-century Greek usage, it means imminently. John tells his readers in
seven literal churches in Asia Minor (Ephesus, Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira,
Sardis, Philadelphia, Laodicea) that these events are about to happen to
them. Revelation 1:3 (NKJV): "Blessed is he who reads and those who hear the
words of this prophecy, and keep those things which are written in it; for
the time is near (ho gar kairos eggys)." Kairos eggys the appointed
time is near. John is writing a circular letter to real churches with real
crises. He is not writing a calendar for 1844. Revelation 22:10 (NKJV): "Do not seal the words of the prophecy of this book,
for the time is at hand." Contrast this with Daniel 12:4. Daniel was
told to SEAL his prophecy because its fulfillment was far off. John was told
NOT to seal Revelation because its fulfillment was near. If these events were
1,800+ years away and pointed to a 19th-century American denomination, why
would John be told not to seal the book? Revelation
14:12 therefore is addressed to: first-century
saints under Roman Imperial persecution Christians being pressured to
worship Caesar, receive the Imperial mark of loyalty, and abandon the
commandments of God and the faith of Jesus. The verse is a pastoral call to
patient endurance (hypomone) for believers already in that furnace. It is not
a prophetic clock-marker for a denomination to be born 18 centuries later in
America. |
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: Chronological Snobbery + Audience Substitution. The SDA hermeneutic
silently replaces the original first-century audience (the seven churches of
Asia Minor under Rome) with a 19th-century American audience (the
post-Millerite movement). They read John's urgent 'the time is near' as if it
means 'the time is 1863.' This is not interpretation; it is substitution. The
SDA simply erases John's own stated audience and pencils themselves in.
Rhetorical
Question: If John told his original readers in Revelation 1:1 and 22:10 that
these things would 'shortly take place' and that 'the time is near' and the
SDA says this is actually about them in 1863 is the SDA saying John lied to
the seven churches of Asia Minor? Or does 'shortly' mean something different in
Bible prophecy than it does in every other piece of first-century Greek
literature?
POINT 2:
THE THREE ANGELS' MESSAGES (REV. 14:6–12) WERE ADDRESSED TO THE ROMAN IMPERIAL
CRISIS NOT TO THE ADVENTIST MOVEMENT
The SDA reads the
Three Angels' Messages of Revelation 14:6–12 as a progressive prophetic
sequence culminating in their own movement. But reading these messages in their
immediate literary and historical context — as every serious exegetical
commentary requires — reveals they address the crisis of emperor worship and
the fall of Rome, not the publication of Review and Herald pamphlets in the
19th century.
|
ANGEL 1 (Rev. 14:6–7) |
ANGEL 2 (Rev. 14:8) |
ANGEL 3 (Rev. 14:9–12) |
|
'Fear God and give glory to Him, for the hour of His judgment
has come.' The gospel proclaimed amid Roman Imperial blasphemy; Caesar
claimed divine titles. 'Worship Him who made heaven and earth' is a direct
counter to the Imperial cult. |
'Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that great city.' Babylon =
Rome (cf. 1 Pet. 5:13; Rev. 17:9 'the city on seven hills'). This 'fall'
language echoes Isaiah 21:9 applied to historical Babylon. Rome's moral and
eventual political fall is in view. |
'If anyone worships the beast and his image and receives his
mark...' The beast = Nero Caesar (Gematria: 666 = Neron Kaiser in Hebrew
letters, confirmed by Papyrus 115 variant 616 = Nero Caesar in Latin). The
mark = Imperial loyalty oaths and economic participation in Roman commerce. |
|
The Partial Preterist reads this as the apostolic proclamation
going to the nations during the first century. the Great Commission in
crisis mode as Rome demanded worship. |
Historically: Rome sacked Jerusalem in A.D. 70; Rome itself
declined and fell in A.D. 476. The 'fall' of Babylon-Rome is an
already-accomplished historical reality. |
The call to endurance in 14:12 follows directly: 'Here is the
patience of the saints' meaning, given all this Roman pressure to worship
the beast, here is what characterizes the faithful: they endure, they keep
God's commandments, they hold the faith of Jesus. |
|
The
Critical Implication for the SDA Remnant Claim: If
the Three Angels' Messages are a unified literary unit describing the
first-century crisis of Rome and the call to faithfulness amid Neronian
persecution and Revelation 14:12 is the conclusion of that unit then
Revelation 14:12 is the pastoral summary of first-century Christian
endurance. It is not an unfulfilled prophecy dangling in history waiting for
a Battle Creek denomination to claim it. The SDA Remnant claim requires the
entire Three Angels' sequence to be prophetically unresolved and future-pointing.
Partial Preterism closes that door permanently. |
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: Selective Fulfillment + Arbitrary Unit Division. The SDA
selectively reads Revelation 14:8 as already-fulfilled ('Babylon is fallen' =
the 'fallen churches' of Protestantism in the SDA schema), but reads 14:12 as
still-unfulfilled and pointing to themselves. They cannot have it both ways. If
the Three Angels' Messages form a continuous literary unit which they do,
grammatically and structurally then they rise and fall together
hermeneutically. You cannot apply partial fulfillment to suit your
institutional narrative.
Reductio Ad
Absurdum: If the Second Angel's message ('Babylon is fallen') was fulfilled in
the 1840s when SDA founders declared the Protestant churches fallen meaning
that message is already in the past then the Third Angel's message and
Revelation 14:12 that immediately follows should also be in the past, not a
present marker for the SDA. But SDAs need 14:12 to be perpetually present and
applicable to themselves. So they apply fulfilled-past logic to the Second
Angel and future-present logic to the Third Angel and 14:12. This is not
hermeneutics. This is picking prophetic cherries.
POINT 3: THE 'BEAST' AND 'MARK' IN REVELATION 14 ARE FIRST-CENTURY REALITIES NOT FUTURE SUNDAY LAWS
|
Revelation
13:18 — The Number of the Beast: "Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding
calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number
is 666." Greek gematria (isopsephia) applied to Hebrew
transliteration of 'Neron Kaiser' (Nero Caesar) = 50+200+6+50+100+60+200 =
666. The Latin form 'Nero Caesar' = 616, which is the variant reading found
in Papyrus 115 and cited by Irenaeus (Against Heresies 5.30.1) as a known
textual variant in his own day confirming the first-century identification
was known in the early church. Revelation 17:9 — "The
seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman sits." Rome is
universally known as the city built on seven hills (Septimontium). This is
not a hidden clue. Every first-century reader knew this immediately. Conclusion:
The beast is identified by John's own
internal clues as the Roman Imperial system under Nero. The 'mark of the
beast' is participation in the Imperial cult worship of Caesar, economic
participation requiring loyalty oaths. It is not a future Sunday Law. The
partial preterist reading is not speculation; it is following the text's own
internal evidence. |
Now apply this to
Revelation 14:12. The verse says: 'Here is the patience of the saints; here are
those who keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus' coming
immediately AFTER the warning against receiving the beast's mark. The saints
being described are first-century believers who refused to receive Nero's mark,
who would not worship the Imperial image, who endured torture and death for the
faith of Jesus. They are the Roman-era martyrs not 21st-century American
churchgoers debating which day to worship on.
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: Futurist Presupposition Smuggling. The SDA reads 'the beast' and
'the mark' as entirely unfulfilled future events, then reads 'the patience of
the saints' in 14:12 as the response to that unfulfilled threat making it
also future and pointing to themselves. But this entire chain of reasoning is
built on the presupposition that the beast is future, which the text itself
contradicts via internal gematria, geographical clues, and the first-century
urgency markers (en tachei, kairos eggys). Remove the futurist presupposition,
and the SDA Remnant claim has no prophetic ground to stand on.
Rhetorical
Question: If the Mark of the Beast in Revelation 14:9 is a future Sunday Law
that has not yet been enforced, and if Revelation 14:12 describes the saints
who successfully resist that Mark then how can the SDA claim to be those
saints right now, today, when the alleged Sunday Law has not yet been enacted?
Are they resisting a law that does not exist yet? Is the SDA the Remnant in
advance of the very crisis that supposedly defines the Remnant? That is not
prophecy. That is a pre-emptive self-appointment.
POINT 4:
'COMMANDMENTS OF GOD' IN REVELATION 14:12 THE JOHANNINE DEFINITION VERSUS THE
SDA DEFINITION
|
JOHN'S OWN DEFINITION
(entolai tou theou) |
SDA'S IMPOSED DEFINITION |
|
1 John 3:23 'This is His commandment: believe in the name of
His Son Jesus Christ and love one another.' Zero mention of Sabbath. |
'Commandments of God' = the Ten Commandments, especially the
Saturday Sabbath as the Seal of God. |
|
1 John 5:3 'His commandments are not burdensome.' The context
is New Covenant relational obedience, not Mosaic legal observance. |
SDA defines Saturday Sabbath-keeping as the specific identifying
mark distinguishing the Remnant from all other denominations. |
|
John 14:21 'He who has My commandments and keeps them, it is
he who loves Me.' Christ-relational, not Decalogue-legal. |
This Sabbatarian definition was formalized by Joseph Bates in
1846 and codified in SDA theology not derived from John. |
|
Revelation 22:14 'Blessed are those who do His commandments.'
In context: those who have washed their robes i.e., those in Christ. |
The SDA definition was imported into Revelation retroactively
from Ellen White's framework, not exegeted from John's text. |
|
Partial
Preterist Addition: The First-Century 'Commandments' Context: In
the context of the beast-crisis of Revelation 14, 'keeping the commandments
of God' means specifically refusing to obey the Imperial command to worship
Caesar. The Roman Imperial system was precisely a system of competing
commandments. Nero's edicts vs. God's commandments. First-century Christians
chose God's commandments over Caesar's, and died for it. The contrast is not
Saturday vs. Sunday. The contrast is Christ vs. Caesar. To read Sabbatarian
theology into this first-century political-theological confrontation is to
completely misread the crisis John's readers were actually facing. |
New Covenant
Theology note: Under NCT, the Sabbath command is part of the Old Covenant
Mosaic administration that has been fulfilled and transcended in Christ
(Colossians 2:16–17; Hebrews 4:9–10; Romans 14:5). The moral law is not
abolished but re-administered through Christ and written on the heart by the
Spirit (Jeremiah 31:33; 2 Corinthians 3:3). The New Covenant 'commandments of
God' centre on faith in Jesus and love exactly as John defines them. The
Saturday Sabbath as a legal obligation is not part of the New Covenant
framework. It is the shadow; Christ is the substance.
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: Anachronistic Eisegesis + Definitional Rigging. The SDA pre-loads
their Sabbatarian definition into the phrase 'commandments of God,' then uses
Revelation 14:12 to prove that Sabbath-keeping is the mark of the Remnant. But
the definition was inserted before the argument began. Remove the pre-loaded
definition and examine what John actually means by this phrase in his own
literary context and the entire SDA proof text evaporates.
POINT 5:
BABYLON IS ALREADY FALLEN THE SDA 'REMNANT-CALLING' FROM REVELATION 18:4 IS
HISTORICALLY RESOLVED
SDAs frequently
pair their Remnant claim with Revelation 18:4 'Come out of her, my people,
lest you share in her sins' arguing that God is calling His people out of the
fallen Protestant churches into the SDA Church as the true Remnant. But partial
preterism reveals that 'Babylon' and its fall in Revelation 17–18 are already
historically identified and substantially fulfilled.
|
Revelation
17–18 — Babylon Identified by John's Own Clues: •
Revelation 17:9 — 'The
seven heads are seven mountains' = Rome (seven hills). Not Chicago. Not the
Vatican in the SDA sense of a future power. Rome. •
Revelation 17:18 — 'The
woman whom you saw is that great city which reigns over the kings of the
earth.' The only
one city reigned over the kings of the earth: Rome. •
Revelation 18:2 — 'Babylon
the great is fallen, is fallen.' The aorist-like prophetic perfect announces
Rome's moral corruption and inevitable judgment. Historically: Rome sacked
and fell progressively from A.D. 410 (Visigoths) to A.D. 476 (final Western
collapse). •
1 Peter 5:13 — 'She who is
in Babylon, elect together with you, greets you.' Peter writes from Rome and
calls it Babylon confirming this first-century identification was standard
in the apostolic community. Implication: If
Babylon = Rome, and Rome has already fallen historically, then the call 'Come
out of her' (Rev. 18:4) was primarily addressed to first-century believers
within Rome's sphere Jewish and Gentile Christians being pressured by the
Imperial cult. The SDA use of this text to call people out of Protestantism
into their denomination is a double misidentification: wrong Babylon, wrong
audience, wrong century. |
The SDA 'Babylon
= fallen Protestant churches' interpretation, popularized by the Millerite
movement in the 1840s, requires an entirely novel redefinition of Babylon that
(1) ignores Rome entirely, (2) ignores John's own geographical clues, and (3)
retroactively identifies denominations that did not exist in the first century.
This is not exegesis. This is prophecy-as-polemic using apocalyptic language
as a weapon against ecclesiastical competitors.
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: Moving the Referent + Special Pleading. John defines Babylon with
seven geographical and political clues all pointing to Rome. The SDA redefines
Babylon to mean Protestant denominations a referent John never describes,
never hints at, and that did not exist for 1,500 years after he wrote. They
then use their redefined Babylon to justify their Remnant status. But if you
can redefine Babylon without exegetical warrant, you can prove anything from
Revelation which means you have proven nothing.
Rhetorical
Question: If 'Come out of Babylon' (Revelation 18:4) means 'leave the
Protestant churches and join the SDA,' what did this verse mean to the
Christians living in Rome under Nero in A.D. 64? Were they supposed to hold on
for 1,800 years until the SDA was ready to receive them? Or does the verse have
an actual first-century meaning which is: do not participate in Rome's
Imperial corruption that the SDA has commandeered for their own institutional
recruitment?
POINT 6:
THE POSTMILLENNIAL VISION THE KINGDOM IS ADVANCING, NOT RETREATING TO A
BELEAGUERED REMNANT
|
Postmillennial
Exegesis of the Remnant Concept: Matthew 13:31–33 (Parable of the Mustard Seed and
Leaven): The Kingdom of God is like a
mustard seed that GROWS into a great tree, like leaven that permeates the
WHOLE batch of dough. Jesus' own vision is expansive, permeating, growing not shrinking to a Remnant waiting to be airlifted out of a collapsing world. Isaiah 9:7 — 'Of
the increase of His government and peace there will be NO END.' The
trajectory of Christ's reign is perpetual increase, not millennial retreat. Daniel 2:35 — The
stone cut without hands strikes the statue and becomes 'a great mountain and
filled the whole earth.' The Kingdom fills the WHOLE earth it is not a
minority remnant hiding from a beast system. Implication
for the SDA Remnant concept: The SDA
picture of an embattled Remnant Bride the tiny faithful few holding the
Saturday Sabbath while the whole world joins the beast-powered Sunday
coalition is not the biblical picture of the Church's destiny. It is a
19th-century pessimistic eschatology dressed in apocalyptic language. The
postmillennial vision sees the Church not as a shrinking remnant but as a
leavening, growing, kingdom-advancing community consistent with God's
covenantal promises across all of Scripture. |
Furthermore: The
SDA eschatological picture requires that the visible Church become almost
entirely apostate fallen into Babylon leaving only the SDA as the faithful
Remnant. But the postmillennial reading of Church history is exactly the
opposite: despite all corruption and persecution, the Church of Jesus Christ
has grown from a handful of fishermen in Galilee to over 2.4 billion adherents
worldwide. The gates of hell have not prevailed against it (Matthew 16:18).
This is not the picture of a collapsing institution needing a Remnant lifeboat.
This is the mustard tree in full growth.
LOGICAL FALLACY
IDENTIFIED: False Dilemma + Eschatological Pessimism. The SDA presents a false
dilemma: either you are in the SDA Remnant or you are part of Babylon's fallen
system. This eliminates the third option the vast, diverse, Spirit-filled
body of Christ across denominations, nations, and centuries which is
precisely what the Bible describes as the Church triumphant. The Kingdom is not
a disaster requiring a Remnant rescue operation. It is a stone becoming a
mountain that fills the whole earth.
MASTER
COMPARISON: SDA CLAIMS vs. PARTIAL PRETERIST EXEGESIS
|
SDA CLAIM |
PARTIAL PRETERIST /
HISTORICO-GRAMMATICAL REBUTTAL |
|
Rev. 14:12 is an unfulfilled prophecy pointing to the SDA Church
as the end-time Remnant. |
Rev. 1:1 & 22:10 declare the fulfillment is 'at hand /
shortly.' The primary audience is the seven first-century churches under Rome not a 19th-century denomination. |
|
The Three Angels' Messages point to a future global crisis and
the SDA as the faithful responders. |
The Three Angels form a unified literary unit addressing the
Roman Imperial crisis (Nero/Domitian). The Second Angel's 'Babylon is fallen'
= Rome, already fallen historically. |
|
The 'beast' and 'mark' in Rev. 14:9-12 are future, and the
saints of 14:12 resist a future Sunday Law. |
The beast = Nero Caesar (gematria 666 / 616). The mark = Roman
Imperial loyalty. The saints of 14:12 are first-century Roman-era martyrs,
not modern Sabbatarians. |
|
'Commandments of God' = Ten Commandments, especially the
Saturday Sabbath (Seal of God). |
John defines entolai tou theou in 1 John 3:23 as faith in Christ
+ love no Sabbath mentioned. In Rev. 14 context: refusing Caesar's
commands, not choosing a day of worship. |
|
'Come out of Babylon' (Rev. 18:4) = leave Protestant churches,
join the SDA Remnant. |
Babylon = Rome (Rev. 17:9,18; 1 Pet. 5:13). Rome has already
fallen. The call was to first-century believers. The SDA redefinition of
Babylon is exegetically unwarranted. |
|
The Church is declining into apostasy; only the SDA Remnant
survives the final crisis. |
The Kingdom grows as a mustard tree filling the earth (Matt.
13:31-33; Dan. 2:35; Isa. 9:7). Postmillennialism rejects the eschatological
pessimism that makes the Remnant narrative necessary. |
THREE
MIC-DROP CROSS-EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
|
Q1 |
Revelation
1:1 says that God gave John this revelation to show His servants 'things
which must shortly take place' (en tachei), and Revelation 22:10 says 'do not
seal the words of this prophecy, for the time is at hand' (ho kairos eggys).
You claim that Revelation 14:12 is a prophecy pointing to the SDA Church,
organized in 1863. Please explain: in what language, in what century, and by
what hermeneutical rule does 'shortly' and 'at hand' mean 'eighteen hundred
years from now, in Battle Creek, Michigan'? And while you answer, please also
explain why John was told NOT to seal his book when Daniel was told TO seal
his (Daniel 12:4) precisely because Daniel's fulfillment was far off if
Revelation's fulfillment was equally distant? Are you calling John a liar to
his original audience, or are you simply applying a hermeneutical double
standard that serves your institutional narrative? |
|
Q2 |
The
Apostle John provides his own internal identification of the beast in
Revelation 17:9 'the seven heads are seven mountains on which the woman
sits' a universally recognized first-century reference to Rome, the city
built on seven hills. He further confirms in Revelation 13:18 that the number
of the beast is 666, which by Greek and Hebrew gematria resolves to 'Neron
Kaiser' Nero Caesar a calculation known to early church fathers and
confirmed by the variant 616 (Nero Caesar in Latin) in Papyrus 115.
Revelation 14:12 describes the saints who refused this beast's mark. If the
beast John explicitly identifies is Nero's Rome already fallen and judged
in history then the saints of Revelation 14:12 who endured by refusing that
beast's mark are first-century Roman-era martyrs. On what exegetical grounds,
using the text of Revelation itself and not Ellen White's visions, do you
override John's own internal geographical and gematric identification of the
beast to make it a future Sunday-Law power? And if you cannot override it
from the text, how can Revelation 14:12 describe your denomination? |
|
Q3 |
Your
SDA Remnant theology requires that by the end of human history, the visible
Christian Church will have become almost entirely apostate merged with
Babylon, under the beast-power, enforcing a Sunday Law against God's
commandments with only the SDA surviving as the faithful Remnant. But Jesus
said in Matthew 13:31-33 that the Kingdom of God is like a mustard seed that
grows into a great tree and like leaven that permeates the whole batch a
picture of unstoppable expansion, not institutional collapse. Isaiah 9:7 says
of Christ's government: 'of the increase of His government and peace there
will be no end.' Daniel 2:35 says the stone becomes a mountain that fills the
whole earth. If the trajectory of the Kingdom is perpetual growth and global
permeation as Jesus, Isaiah, and Daniel all declare then on what
scriptural basis does your eschatology require the Church to collapse into
apostasy so thoroughly that only your denomination constitutes the Remnant?
Is your Remnant theology built on the words of Jesus in Matthew 13, or on the
Great Disappointment of 1844? |
CONCLUSION:
THE REMNANT IS CHRIST'S CHURCH ACROSS ALL AGES REVEALED, NOT INVENTED
|
The SDA Remnant claim from Revelation 14:12 collapses on
multiple fronts simultaneously. Internally:
John defines 'commandments of God' in his own letters as faith in Christ and
love not Saturday Sabbath-keeping. Partial Preterism does not merely challenge one point of
the SDA argument. It destroys the entire hermeneutical foundation on which
the SDA Remnant claim is built because that claim requires Revelation 14:12
to be entirely unfulfilled and perpetually open, available for institutional
appropriation. Once you read John within John's own stated context, John's
own stated urgency, and John's own stated audience that door closes. To
our SDA friends: |
FORMER ADVENTISTS PHILIPPINES
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
Former Adventists Philippines Association, Inc
SEC Registration No: 2025090219381-03
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
Partner with me in advancing this ministry. Be part of this mission! Your support helps us continue gospel-centered outreach and resources.
• GCash: 0969-514-3944
• PayPal: paypal.me/formeradventistsph
• Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
No comments:
Post a Comment