Let’s talk about the chart by SDA Pastor Ivor Myers, "The Blueprint". Visually, it is a very stunning piece of graphic design. Myers did a great job making the Sanctuary doctrine look like a seamless, perfectly engineered "blueprint" for human history and salvation.
However, when we actually sit down and look at how it handles the Bible, we run into some serious hermeneutical (Bible interpretation) problems and logical fallacies. Let’s break it down point-by-point in a casual Investigating Adventism Q&A format.
Q: Does Psalm 77:13 actually teach that the sanctuary is a prophetic timeline?
A: No, this is a classic case of Proof-Texting and the Fallacy of Equivocation.
Look at the bottom of the chart. It quotes Psalm 77:13: "Thy way, O God, is in the sanctuary." The chart uses this single verse to argue that the physical layout of the Old Testament tabernacle is a literal timeline or "blueprint" for the plan of salvation, stretching from Creation all the way to the New Earth.
The Hermeneutical Problem: If you read the whole chapter of Psalm 77, Asaph is crying out to God in distress. He starts remembering the Exodus and God's mighty works. When he says, "Your way, O God, is holy" (which is a better translation of the Hebrew word qodesh here, rather than "in the sanctuary"), he is simply praising God's holy character. Even if translated as "sanctuary," it's poetic language about God's dwelling place, not a secret decoder ring for church history.
The Logical Fallacy: Pulling half a verse out of a poetic song to build a rigid, multi-millennial prophetic timeline is stripping the verse of its original meaning.
Q: Does the transition from the Holy Place to the Most Holy Place match Church History?
A: The book of Hebrews says otherwise. This relies on the Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy.
The chart maps the Holy Place (lampstand, showbread, incense) to the "Church through the Ages," "The Great Apostasy," and "The Reformation." Then, it maps the Most Holy Place to 1844 onwards, the "Three Angels' Messages" and the "Investigative Judgment."
The Hermeneutical Problem: The writer of Hebrews completely dismantles this timeline. Hebrews 9:12 tells us that when Jesus ascended, “He entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption.” The veil was torn at the cross (Matthew 27:51). Jesus didn't wait in the "Holy Place" until 1844 to finally enter the "Most Holy Place." He sat down at the right hand of God immediately.
The Logical Fallacy: The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy happens when someone shoots at a barn and then draws a bullseye around the bullet holes to look like an expert. The chart takes SDA history (the 1844 disappointment and subsequent doctrines) and artificially draws a "bullseye" around it using the sanctuary rooms, ignoring the clear timeline given in the New Testament.
Q: What about the "Law of God" in the Most Holy Place? Will we be judged by the Ten Commandments in an Investigative Judgment?
A: This misses the reality of the New Covenant. It’s a Category Mistake.
In the Most Holy Place section, the chart highlights the "Ark of the Covenant," the "Mercy Seat," and the "Law of God" (the Ten Commandments) as the standard for the Investigative Judgment.
The Hermeneutical Problem: This is where we need to clearly distinguish between the covenants. The tablets of stone inside the physical Ark represented the Old Covenant made at Sinai. But we are no longer under that covenant; it is obsolete (Hebrews 8:13).
"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13(ESV)
The New Covenant is not just the Old Covenant transferred to heaven; it's a completely new administration where the Law of Christ is written on our hearts. Projecting the Sinaitic Law into heaven as the ultimate standard for a future judgment forces Old Covenant shadows onto New Covenant realities. Christ Himself is our fulfillment.
"So don’t let anyone criticize you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating Jewish holidays and feasts or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. For these were only temporary rules that ended when Christ came. They were only shadows of the real thing of Christ himself." Colossians 2:16-17(TLB)
"In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." Hebrews 8:13(ESV)
The New Covenant is not just the Old Covenant transferred to heaven; it's a completely new administration where the Law of Christ is written on our hearts. Projecting the Sinaitic Law into heaven as the ultimate standard for a future judgment forces Old Covenant shadows onto New Covenant realities. Christ Himself is our fulfillment.
"So don’t let anyone criticize you for what you eat or drink, or for not celebrating Jewish holidays and feasts or new moon ceremonies or Sabbaths. For these were only temporary rules that ended when Christ came. They were only shadows of the real thing of Christ himself." Colossians 2:16-17(TLB)
The Logical Fallacy: The Category Mistake here is treating the shadows (the physical tablets of stone representing a localized covenant with Israel) as the eternal, universal reality in heaven.
Q: Does the "Investigative Judgment" phase actually fit the biblical view of salvation?
A: No, it undermines the finished work of Christ. It relies on Begging the Question.
The chart places the "Investigative Judgment" right before the Second Coming. In SDA theology, this means Jesus is currently reviewing the records of believers to see whose sins will actually be blotted out and who is truly worthy of salvation.
The Theological Reality: Salvation is entirely by grace through faith in Christ's finished work. When Jesus cried out, "It is finished," the work of atonement was completed. While it is true that believers are called to persevere and walk in faith, our justification is not suspended in a heavenly audit. God already knows who are His. If we are in Christ, there is no condemnation (Romans 8:1).
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." Romans 8:1(ESV)
"There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus." Romans 8:1(ESV)
Our assurance rests in His perfect work, not in our performance passing an ongoing investigation.
The Logical Fallacy: Begging the Question (Circular Reasoning). The chart assumes the SDA premise (that 1844 started an investigative judgment) is true, and then uses the sanctuary illustration to "prove" the doctrine, even though the Bible never teaches a post-cross, pre-advent judgment of believers' works to determine their salvation.
In summary, this chart by SDA Pastor Ivor Myers, "The Blueprint," is a masterclass in visual storytelling, but it falls apart when you apply solid biblical interpretation. It relies on out-of-context verses, ignores the clear teaching of Hebrews regarding Christ's current heavenly ministry, drags Old Covenant shadows into the New Covenant reality, and subtly shifts our confidence away from Christ's finished work.
FORMER ADVENTISTS PHILIPPINES
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
Partner with me in advancing this ministry. Be part of this mission! Your support helps us continue gospel-centered outreach and resources.
• GCash: 0969-514-3944
• PayPal: paypal.me/formeradventistsph
• Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
No comments:
Post a Comment