Showing posts with label Witnessing to SDAs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Witnessing to SDAs. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 23, 2025

Why Do Most Seventh-day Adventists Resort to Personal Attacks Instead of Facing the Truth?


Have you ever tried having a respectful conversation with a Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) about their beliefs—maybe pointing out errors in their doctrines using Scripture—only to be met with insults, name-calling, or personal attacks?

You’re not alone.

Instead of dealing with the real issue—whether or not their teachings are biblical—some just shut down the conversation and go straight to ad hominem attacks.

(“Nagtampo ka lang” “Hindi ka lang pinagbigyan!”  “Apostate ka!”)

These are not answers, they’re distractions. And honestly, they reveal something deeper: a heart that’s unwilling to face the truth.


What is Ad Hominem Anyway?

Ad hominem is a Latin phrase that means “against the person.”
It happens when someone ignores the argument or facts and attacks the person instead.

Example:
You: "Ellen G. White contradicted the Bible on several key points."
Them: "Eh ikaw nga, hindi mo nga naiintindihan ang Bible!"

That’s not dialogue. That’s defensiveness, pride, and often fear of being proven wrong.


Why Do Most SDAs Act This Way?

This isn’t coming from hate—this is coming from understanding. Here's why many SDAs fall into this trap:

1. They’re Conditioned to See Critics as Enemies

From childhood, many SDAs are taught that anyone who criticizes Ellen White or the SDA Church is being used by Satan. So, the moment you raise a question, you're automatically labeled as rebellious, deceived, or anti-Christ. This mindset shuts down critical thinking.

2. They’re Taught That SDA = “Remnant Church”

When you believe your church is the “one true church” and all others are Babylon, it becomes emotionally painful to even consider that it might be wrong. So instead of honestly examining the issue, some lash out personally to defend what they believe is “God’s last-day people.”

3. They Lack Solid Gospel Foundation

Many SDAs don’t have deep, personal confidence in the finished work of Christ. Instead, they rely on performance, rules, and the writings of Ellen G. White. So, when confronted with real gospel truths—salvation by grace alone, justification by faith alone—they feel unstable. And when someone is unstable in their faith, they lash out instead of listening. 

Here’s the Real Problem: Ad Hominem Is a Sign of Spiritual Bankruptcy

Let’s be real. Personal attacks are sinful. They're not just unkind—they’re unbiblical. Let’s be blunt but biblical: resorting to personal attacks is not just bad manners—it’s a spiritual red flag. It shows that the person:

  • Has no solid biblical answer

  • Is avoiding the truth

  • And may actually be spiritually bankrupt—that is, lacking the substance of genuine, Spirit-filled faith

The Bible gives us clear guidance:

1 Timothy 6:4-5

“They are conceited and understand nothing. They have an unhealthy interest in controversies and quarrels… who think that godliness is a means to financial gain. They have been robbed of the truth.

This describes someone who talks spiritual but has been emptied of truth. They argue, but don’t learn. They debate, but don’t repent.

Titus 1:16

“They claim to know God, but by their actions they deny him. They are detestable, disobedient and unfit for doing anything good.”

If a person constantly attacks the character of the person instead of humbly examining truth, they may claim to follow God—but their actions tell a different story.

What Should SDAs (and All of Us) Do Instead?

The Bible calls us to truth and humility. The goal isn’t just to win arguments—it’s to know God, to love the truth, and to be transformed.

Ephesians 4:15

“Speak the truth in love.”

If you're truly in the truth, you won’t be afraid of questions. And you won’t need to attack people.

James 1:19-20

“Everyone should be quick to listen, slow to speak and slow to become angry, for man’s anger does not bring about the righteous life that God desires.”

You don’t defend the truth with pride and harshness. You defend it with patience, grace, and confidence in God’s Word.


Ephesians 4:29

“Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths, but only what is helpful for building others up…”

Personal insults? Sarcastic responses? Demeaning labels? Not helpful. Not building anyone up.


Proverbs 18:2

“A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.”

When someone refuses to listen and just argues to defend their group—they’re not pursuing truth. They’re just trying to “win.”


2 Timothy 2:24–25

“And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but kind to everyone, able to teach, patiently enduring evil, correcting opponents with gentleness…”

If you’re truly standing for God, you don’t need to insult people. You correct with gentleness, not aggression or personal shots.


A Loving Rebuke for Our SDA Friends

Dear SDA friend, if your first reaction to biblical correction is to attack the person—not the argument—please examine your heart.

Ask yourself honestly:

  • Why am I reacting this way?

  • Is it because I’m afraid they’re right?

  • Am I more loyal to my church than to the Word of God?

Truth can handle questions. Falsehood needs to silence people.

Jesus said:

“You shall know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”John 8:32

But if you block out every challenge with sarcasm, insults, and anger, you’ll never get to that freedom.


Truth Doesn’t Fear the Light

If SDA doctrine is truly biblical, it should stand strong under scrutiny. But if it crumbles the moment someone opens the Bible, that should make you pause.

So next time someone questions your beliefs, don’t take it personally. Take it biblically. Go to the Scriptures. Pray. Think. Be humble enough to admit if something doesn’t add up.

Because the goal isn’t to be “right” for pride’s sake—it’s to be right with God.

Final Words: Don’t Attack the Messenger — Examine the Message

Dear SDA friend, if your first response to critique is to attack the person—not the Scripture they present—you’re missing the point.

Ask yourself:

  • Am I defending God’s Word, or just my religion?

  • Am I humble enough to listen if I’ve been wrong?

  • Am I secure in Christ, or am I afraid to be corrected?

The gospel gives us freedom. You don’t have to fight or attack to protect your identity. Jesus already secured your identity—if your trust is in Him, not in your denomination.

Don’t run from the truth. Don’t attack it. Embrace it. That’s how real faith grows.


For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944

Thursday, July 17, 2025

Is the Former Adventists Philippines Really "Attacking" the Seventh-Day Adventist Church? Let’s Clear This Up!


We’ve been hearing some interesting things lately — especially from some of our beloved Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) friends who think that Former Adventists Philippines (FAP) exists just to badmouth or destroy the SDA church. Some even accuse us of “sinisiraan lang ang iglesia” or “lumalaban sa bayan ng Diyos.”

Well, let’s talk about this honestly and openly. It’s about time we clarify a few myths and give helpful tips to our SDA friends para hindi sila agad mapaniwala sa haka-haka.


FAP’s Ministry Is About the Gospel, Not Grudges

First off, Former Adventists Philippines was created not to destroy but to reach out — to help those who, like us, had honest questions about SDA teachings and found biblical answers outside of it. FAP exists because we care enough to tell the truth, especially about doctrines we once believed and preached ourselves.

When we explain the errors in the SDA’s Investigative Judgment, Sabbath requirements, or Ellen G. White’s prophetic claims, it’s not out of bitterness — it’s about faithfully standing for the biblical gospel. Wala kaming galit sa mga tao. What we reject are the teachings we’ve seen to be unbiblical after careful study.


Correction Is Not the Same as Destruction

To our SDA friends: There’s a big difference between attacking people and correcting wrong ideas.

Even Jesus and the apostles publicly corrected the Pharisees and false teachers in their time, not because they hated them, but because they cared for the souls of people being misled. The Bible commands believers to “contend for the faith that was once for all delivered to the saints” (Jude 3).

When FAP points out where the SDA doctrines go against Scripture, it’s part of our Christian duty. Hindi ito siraan — it’s loving correction. And just like how SDAs preach against Catholicism, Born-Again churches, or other faiths they disagree with, FAP also has the freedom and responsibility to explain why we left and what the Bible truly teaches.


Tips for SDAs to Avoid Misunderstanding FAP

Dear SDA friends, here are some friendly reminders when you encounter FAP materials:

  1. Listen to understand, not to react.
    Don’t assume agad that we’re attacking you personally. Listen to what’s actually being said, and check it against your Bible.

  2. Separate people from teachings.
    We’re not against you as individuals. We’re addressing specific doctrines, and those can be examined without getting offended.

  3. Check your church history honestly.
    Before accusing others of “attacking the church,” remember how early Adventists spoke against other denominations, too. Even Ellen White herself had sharp words for other faiths. If they had the right to do it for what they believed was the truth, so do we.

  4. Use open dialogue, not defensive blocking.
    When people leave the SDA and share their reasons biblically, it deserves a fair hearing. Shouting “naninira kayo!” only shows insecurity in one’s own position.

  5. Remember, Truth doesn’t fear examination.
    If your beliefs are truly biblical, you have nothing to fear from open, respectful dialogue.


Conclusion: Let’s Talk Like Family

FAP isn’t here to mock, insult, or destroy anyone. We’re here to lovingly challenge and invite people to see the freedom of the gospel found in Christ alone, not in legalistic systems or man-made doctrines.

To our SDA friends: We were once like you. And it’s because we care about you that we dare to speak. Truth can stand examination. Falsehood fears it. So let’s talk, let’s reason, and let’s examine the Scriptures together.

No name-calling. No fear-mongering. Just honest, Bible-based conversation.


For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944



Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Why Do Some SDA Debaters Fall into the Dunning-Kruger Effect Trap?

Have you ever argued with someone who’s super confident about a topic, only to realize they actually don’t know much about it? It’s like they think they’re experts, but the more they talk, the clearer it gets that they barely understand what they’re saying. There’s a name for that — it’s called the Dunning-Kruger Effect. And honestly, you can often see this happen with some Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) debaters when they defend their doctrines.

Take their belief about Sunday worship, for example. Many SDA members love to claim that Christians only started worshiping on Sundays because Emperor Constantine ordered it in 321 AD. They’ll say it like it’s an open-and-shut case. However, here’s the thing — the Bible itself already shows Christians gathering on the first day of the week, dating back to the time of the apostles (see Acts 20:7 and 1 Corinthians 16:2). History also confirms this practice long before Constantine came along. But since a lot of SDA folks rely too much on their own church writers like Ellen G. White, they end up confidently repeating wrong information without realizing it.

Another example is the famous SDA teaching about the Investigative Judgment in 1844. If you’ve ever heard them talk about Daniel 8:14, you’ll notice how convinced they are that this verse is about a judgment happening in heaven starting in 1844. The problem is, most Christian scholars — whether Protestant, Catholic, or Orthodox — agree that the verse is really about a historical event involving Antiochus Epiphanes in the 2nd century BC. But since many SDA defenders never really check what other biblical scholars have said about it, they jump into debates assuming their interpretation is the only possible one.

The Bible actually warns about this kind of attitude. Proverbs 18:2 says, “A fool takes no pleasure in understanding, but only in expressing his opinion.” That’s exactly what the Dunning-Kruger Effect looks like — people are more interested in sounding right than actually learning. And sadly, a lot of SDA defenders fall into this trap without knowing it.

At the end of the day, it’s not about looking down on people who believe differently, but it’s a reminder for all of us to stay humble. It’s okay to admit when we don’t know something. The truth is, no one learns anything new if we’re too busy pretending we already know it all. So next time you find yourself in a debate with a super confident SDA defender, just remember — sometimes it’s the Dunning-Kruger Effect talking.

Lesson:

  • Be humble.
  • Study widely.
  • Test your beliefs.
  • Avoid the Dunning-Kruger trap.

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944

Saturday, July 12, 2025

How to Rescue Your Loved Ones from Adventism?



Have you ever watched a family member or close friend become deeply involved in Seventh-day Adventism and felt unsure how to reach them? It’s not easy. Adventism often presents itself as simply another Christian denomination—but with its heavy emphasis on Sabbath-keeping, dietary laws, Ellen G. White’s writings, and a distinct end-times narrative, it can quietly but powerfully reshape a person’s faith and priorities.

If you’re burdened for a loved one inside Adventism, you’re not alone. Many have walked this path, praying and patiently witnessing as God opened doors for conversation and understanding. Here are some practical, biblical, and loving ways you can help rescue your loved ones from Adventism’s grip.


1. Pray Strategically and Persistently

Prayer is your greatest weapon and comfort. Rescue missions like this are spiritual battles (2 Corinthians 10:3-5). Pray for God to soften their heart, open their eyes to the sufficiency of Christ, and give you wisdom and courage. Ask for divine opportunities to speak truth in love.

“The effective, fervent prayer of a righteous man avails much.” (James 5:16)

I’ve spoken to many former Adventists who say it was the prayers of faithful family members that finally broke through years of religious confusion.


2. Understand What They Actually Believe

One of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming Adventists believe exactly like evangelicals, just with a Saturday Sabbath. In reality, Adventism has foundational differences on topics such as the nature of the atonement (the Investigative Judgment), the authority of Ellen G. White, soul sleep, and end-time prophecy.

Take time to listen and learn how your loved one understands these doctrines. Not to argue—but to know where they’re coming from. Read their literature, visit their services, and ask sincere, non-combative questions.

Remember Proverbs 18:13:

“He who answers a matter before he hears it, it is folly and shame to him.”


3. Present the Gospel Clearly and Repeatedly

Many Adventists sincerely love Jesus, but their view of the gospel is often mixed with law-keeping and conditional assurance. Gently but clearly explain the biblical gospel—salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone, apart from the works of the law (Ephesians 2:8-9, Romans 3:28).

Show them the sufficiency of Christ’s finished work on the cross. Help them see that Sabbath-keeping, diet, and investigative judgment are not requirements for salvation or maintaining God's favor.

One effective approach is to invite them into Bible studies focused on Romans, Galatians, or John’s Gospel—books that proclaim the liberating message of grace.


4. Use Former Adventist Testimonies

Nothing breaks down walls like a personal story. Share testimonies of former Adventists who found freedom in Christ outside of the denomination. Ministries like Former Adventists Philippines, Life Assurance Ministries, and personal video testimonies online can be powerful tools.

When they hear from people who once believed as they do—and see the joy, peace, and assurance they’ve found—it often stirs curiosity and questions.


5. Be Patient, Loving, and Relentlessly Hopeful

Leaving Adventism can be deeply painful. It often means losing lifelong friendships, family relationships, and a whole religious identity. Expect resistance, denial, and maybe even anger. But stay patient and loving.

Remember Paul’s words:

“And the Lord’s servant must not be quarrelsome but must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. Opponents must be gently instructed, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth.” (2 Timothy 2:24–25)

Your steady presence, kind words, and Christ-centered life may be the tool God uses to lead them out.


Final Thoughts

Rescuing a loved one from Adventism is not about winning arguments—it’s about winning hearts. It’s about introducing them to the freedom, assurance, and joy found in Jesus alone. Stay faithful in prayer, be equipped with biblical truth, and trust God to do what only He can.

You’re not alone in this mission. The Lord is with you. And others are walking this same road — reach out, gather wisdom, and keep loving well.


If you’d like resources, testimonies, or guidance on how to reach Adventist loved ones, visit Former Adventists Philippines or message us. You don’t have to do this alone.

Ready to print? Download the 3-folder brochure PDF now.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

When Truth Knocks and You Slam the Door: A Wake-Up Call to SDAs Who Ignore Correction by: Ptr. Leonardo Nicasa Balberan Jr.


Let's just get real for a second. A lot of SDA members love to say, "Salvation is individual," like that's some kind of hall pass to never actually check what they believe. They figure since they'll face God alone, they don't need to hear warnings from folks like me, former SDA pastors and members, such as Pastor David Sabaupan, Pastor Ronald V. Obidos, Bro. Toto Paulino, Pastor Jan Sabaupan, Pastor Mario Mendoza, Pastor Jasjame Viray, Pastor Zaldie Lucino Ybanez, Engr. Erwin Dela Cruz, Engr. Ellery Sembrano, Pastor Dondon Balberan, Romeo Ramoran, Romeo Visenio, Sis Cynthia Dollente, Pastor Gil Macaraig, Uncle Larry Cudal, Dr. Sammyrem Vitin, Emmanuel Veras, Engr. Darwin Tagacay and many others.

Many SDAs just write us off as bitter or offended. But seriously, is it bitterness to open the Bible and show you what's up? Or are you just bitter about being called out?

If salvation is truly a personal thing, then it's on you to make sure what you believe actually lines up with the Bible. Galatians 1:8 hits hard: "Even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse." That's not a gentle suggestion; it's a serious warning from God. Paul wasn't talking to non-believers. He was talking to a church that started strong in grace but was quickly slipping back into following rules.

And that's exactly the trap Adventism has fallen into.


Stuck Between Rules and Grace

In Galatians 2:16, Paul spells it out clearly: "A person is not justified by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ." Yet, the SDA church keeps dragging the Ten Commandments, the Sabbath, food rules, and tithing into the gospel, acting like Jesus didn't finish the job. If Jesus justifies us, why are we going back to Moses' rules?

Paul actually calls out that exact thinking in Galatians 3:1: "You foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you?" That's strong language! Paul wasn't just fixing bad ideas; he was exposing a spiritual trick. In verses 4 and 5, he questions their logic: "Did you experience so much for nothing? Does God give you His Spirit and work miracles among you by the works of the law or by your believing what you heard?" In other words, if faith saved you and the Spirit gave you power, why are you crawling back to lifeless rules?

And in verse 12, Paul drops another bomb: "The law is not based on faith." That should make you stop and think. The law and faith aren't a team. They're not partners. One is about earning something; the other is about receiving. Try to mix them, and you mess up both.

But SDA teachings still pull believers back to old rules dressed up in a new language. They talk about keeping the Sabbath, following old food laws, and paying tithe like these are necessary for salvation or becoming holy. But Paul warns in Galatians 4:9-10, "How is it that you are turning back to those weak and miserable forces? Do you wish to be enslaved by them all over again? You are observing special days and months and seasons and years." If that doesn't describe the SDA calendar, I don't know what does. Their obsession with the Sabbath, special "feast days," and their made-up "investigative judgment timeline" is just going backward spiritually.

Paul wraps it up in Galatians 5:4: "You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ. You have fallen away from grace." You can't hold onto Mount Sinai (the law) and Calvary (Jesus' sacrifice) at the same time. One gives you stone tablets; the other gives you the blood of Jesus.


Borrowed Beliefs: The Thomas Aquinas Playbook

Now, let's talk about the SDA's favorite excuse: "We only keep the moral law." That's their trick. They split the law into moral, ceremonial, and civil categories, then pick and choose what to follow. But here's the kicker: that whole classification didn't come from the Bible. It came from Thomas Aquinas, a Roman Catholic theologian from the 13th century.

In his book Summa Theologica, specifically Part I–II, Question 99, Article 4, Aquinas was the one who came up with dividing the Old Testament law into moral, ceremonial, and judicial laws. He used this to explain why some parts of the law continued in the Church and others didn't. It was a philosophical idea, not something God commanded in the Bible. SDA theology just borrowed this concept and built a whole belief system around it. They claim the Ten Commandments are "moral" and still must be obeyed, while the rest were canceled. But the Bible itself never makes that division.

James 2:10 says if you break even one part of the law, you're guilty of breaking all of it. That's because the law is a complete package. You can't slice it up like a pizza and say, "We'll keep the cheese and throw away the crust."


SDA Members: Why Are You Scared of the Truth?

Let's be honest. Most SDA members don't really dig deep into the Bible. They just let Ellen G. White's writings tell them what the Bible means. And when someone like me brings up solid biblical, historical, and even Greek and Hebrew-based corrections, many of you either ignore it or just dismiss it as bitterness.

That's not being spiritually smart. That's just being spiritually lazy.

You say we're "just offended" or "left the truth." But ask yourself this: are you rejecting our message because it's wrong, or because it makes you uncomfortable? Are you loyal to God's Word, or just loyal to the system you grew up in?

You're told not to listen to former pastors like me. You're told not to watch our videos, not to read our articles, and not to even consider our questions. But if what you believe is true, it should be able to handle being questioned. Truth never fears examination. Only error does.


Final Thoughts: Don't Confuse Being Comfortable with Being Right

You might say you're happy in the SDA Church. But being comfortable in a lie isn't safe; it's like being asleep. Being part of a big, organized group doesn't prove something is true. Jesus called His followers a "little flock." He said the road to life is narrow. If everyone else is walking one way, that should make you stop and think.

I didn't leave Adventism because I was offended. I left because the gospel I now preach is the one that actually sets people free. I no longer mix what Christ finished on the cross with old Mosaic leftovers. I no longer use Ellen White's dreams to explain the Bible. I stand on Christ being enough, the New Covenant being clear, and the Bible alone having authority.

And I'll keep speaking out. Not because I hate Adventists, but because I love them, and I love the truth more than getting approval from people.

The door to truth is open. But if you keep slamming it shut every time correction knocks, you might find that one day, the door of grace will be closed to you too.


For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944




Saturday, July 5, 2025

The SDA Blind Spot: Why They Can't Hear Former Adventists

 


The Unseen Shame

Leaving a religion you've been part of for a long time is really tough. For me, after 24 years as a Seventh-day Adventist (SDA) member and defending their beliefs, stepping away wasn't just a change in what I believe; it was a huge change in who I am. Even though I know so much about their teachings, it seems my old friends don't understand. There's a kind of shame in what they're doing that they don't even realize.

Repeating Old Arguments

The clearest example of this shame is how they talk to me now. When they try to get me to come back, they just repeat the same favorite arguments and Bible verses. I've heard and defended these arguments countless times over two decades! It's like they think I was never part of their group, or that I don't know anything about their faith. This shows they really don't understand my experience, and it's actually embarrassing for them, though they don't see it.

Don't They Realize?

Don't they feel bad for saying things I already know so well? My many years of being an SDA member and defending their beliefs mean I understand their teachings deeply. I probably know more about their doctrine than most current members. Really, they should be listening to me to understand why I left and the questions I had. But instead, they push their views as if I'm clueless. It's a kind of arrogance that's pretty hard to watch.

A Blind Spot

When someone keeps telling you things you already know, without realizing you're already an expert, it's often called a lack of self-awareness or being mentally inflexible. It means they can't really look at how they're acting and change to fit the situation. It's not like they're being rude on purpose. Instead, it's more like they just can't see the full picture or truly listen and learn.

The Irony

In the end, this whole situation is pretty ironic. The people trying to "help" me come back are the ones who don't get how far I've come or how much I know. The shame isn't mine; it's theirs. And from where I stand, they don't even realize it. Their constant repeating of old arguments is not only useless, but it also shows they don't really care about my unique experience and understanding.



For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944





Saturday, April 20, 2024

DATING SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST BASHER FORMER ADVENTIST NA NGAYON!!!

Wednesday, October 18, 2023

HOW TO MINISTER TO TRANSITIONING SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS?


 

INTRODUCTION

In the following pages, I have emphasized certain words which have been put in italics. These are my emphases.

I. Understand the mindset of Adventism: 

    We must seek first to understand before we can expect to be understood. Adventists believe they have “the truth” and ALL other churches are in error. The following quotation is taken from the Adult Teachers Sabbath School Bible Study Guide, Jan. Feb. Mar., 2009 on the topic of “The Prophetic Gift”. It gives the mindset of Adventism that is often left out of their public relations, yet it reveals the core of Adventist self-understanding which must be understood to effectively minister to them.

“From our study this far, we understand that in Revelation 12:17 “the rest of her offspring” (NKJV) refers to God’s visible remnant church that can be recognized by two specific characteristics: (1) they “keep the commandments of God” as God has given them on Mount Sinai, including the Sabbath commandment, and (2) they “have the testimony of Jesus Christ,” which is the Spirit of prophecy, or the prophetic gift.

“The Sabbath-keeping Adventist movement, from even before its organization in 1863, always has claimed these identifying signs for itself. As Adventists, we proclaim the Ten Commandments, including the seventh-day Sabbath; and we believe that as a church we have the testimony of Jesus; that is, that God manifested Himself in the life and work of Ellen G. White.

“Thus, the Seventh-day Adventist Church is not just one church among many. It is a church prophetically foreseen. God has called this church into existence for a very specific purpose—to proclaim the three angels’ messages to a dying world.” p. 50.

    By the term, “the three angles’ messages, Adventists mean (1) the investigative judgment starting on October 22, 1844, (2) the seventh-day Sabbath as the seal of God, and (3) Sunday as the mark of the beast. Because Adventists believe they are the one and only true, remnant church and have the “truth”, for Transitioning Adventists (TAs) to leave Adventism means that they must face many fears. They wonder how someone can leave the “truth” without going into “error”.

A. Fear of leaving the Sabbath: “Then I was shown a company who were howling in agony. On their garments was written in large characters, ‘Thou art weighed in the balance, and found wanting.’ I asked who this company was. The angel said, ‘These are they who have once kept the Sabbath and have given it up.’” Ellen G. White, Early Writings, p. 37

B. Fear of receiving the mark of the beast: “The sign, or seal, of God, is revealed in the observance of the seventh-day Sabbath, the Lord’s memorial of creation…The mark of the beast is the opposite of this—the observance of the first day of the week. This mark distinguishes those who acknowledge the supremacy of the papal authority from those who acknowledge the authority of God.” Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 8, p. 118.

C. Fear of rejecting Ellen White: “It is Satan’s plan to weaken the faith of God’s people in the Testimonies. Next follows skepticism in regard to the vital points of our faith, the pillars of our position, then doubt as to the Holy Scriptures, and then the downward march to perdition. When the Testimonies, which were once believed are doubted and given up, Satan knows the deceived ones will not stop at this; and he redoubles his efforts till he launches them into open rebellion, which becomes incurable and ends in destruction.” Ellen G. White, Testimonies for the Church, Vol. 4, p. 211

“In ancient times God spoke to men by the mouth of prophets and apostles. In these days He speaks to them by the Testimonies of His Spirit… [writings of Ellen White] The Lord has seen fit to give me a view of the need and errors of His people.” Testimonies of the Church, Vol. 5, p. 66; see also Vol. 4, p. 147-148. (Compare Heb. 1:1-3, Note that Ellen White takes out Christ as God’s final word and inserts her writings as God’s means for communicating His will today.)

D. Fear of leaving the Adventist church: “…We believe that being Seventh-day Adventists has a direct bearing on our salvation; that while a believer can be saved as a Catholic, I would risk my whole spiritual life and salvation were I to leave what I am now and join any other community.” President Jan Paulson, “The Theological Landscape” No. 4, “The Idea of Remnant” printed in the Adventist Review, (Review and Herald, 2002). [Jan Paulson is the current (2009) president of the General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists—the highest office in Adventism.]

E. Fear of leaving the early historical teachings of Adventism: “When the power of God testifies as to what is truth [what God has shown Ellen White] that truth is to stand forever as truth. No after suppositions contrary to the light God has given are to be entertained.” Ellen G. White, Loma Linda Manuscript, No. 150.

F. Fear of being deceived by studying with former Adventists, especially former Adventist pastors: It is our understanding that many Adventist leaders are now telling their members not to study with those who leave Adventism. They reason if a person leaves “the truth” they must be going into error and be deceived by Satan. So why should a person study with someone whom they believe to be deceived by Satan? They convey the idea that if an Adventist studies with a former Adventist they, too, are likely to be deceived by the devil. One leader said, “We may have to close our eyes and ears to those who disagree with us.” On our recent ministry trip (2009) we found that the Adventist churches were notified of our meetings, told to hold conflicting meetings in Adventist churches, and warned their members not to attend our presentations. CDs were mailed out to many churches full of untruths about us and our ministry implying that we left Adventism because we wanted to live in sin and did not believe in obedience to God. We find that Adventist leaders do not want to study with former Adventist pastors. I have tried repeatedly to make an appointment with the Arizona Adventist Conference president all to no avail.

G. Fear of leaving friends and family in a close-knit community. Many who leave Adventism are cut off from family and friends. Often former Adventists (Formers) are forbidden to even talk about religion with their SDA family members. We have experienced this ourselves and as we meet with Formers around the country we hear this over and over again.

H. Fear of compromising SDA standards. Some—not all—TAs may have hidden fears of attending churches that use coffee, tea, alcoholic beverages, and eat meat. Some TAs would be totally scandalized if the church they attended served pork at a potluck or real wine in the communion service

I. Fear of the coming judgment and the time of trouble. “In that fearful time, the righteous must live in the sight of a holy God without an intercessor. The restraint which has been upon the wicked is removed, and Satan has entire control of the finally impenitent. The power attending the last warning has enraged them, and their anger is kindled against all who have received the message. The people of God are then plunged into those scenes of affliction and distress described by the prophet as the time of Jacob’s trouble…It is often the case that trouble is greater in anticipation than reality, but this is not true of the crisis before us. The most vivid presentation cannot reach the magnitude of the ordeal.” Ellen G. White, Spirit of Prophecy, Vol. 4, p. 432f. See also The Great Controversy, p. 425, 614.

    I have personally counseled with a number of Formers or TAs who have had to have professional therapy to rid themselves of the fear of the Adventist time of trouble. When a person reads the description of this event in Ellen White’s The Great Controversy, they will have frightening imaginations of this terrible ordeal. Then when they read: “The most vivid presentation cannot reach the magnitude of the ordeal” and the mental fears start to snowball and they can grow into a fearful, psychotic syndrome.

II. Understand the role of conscience. I highly recommend you read two articles on this topic in the Jan/Feb & Mar/Apr 2002 Proclamation! www.lifeassuranceministries.org/proclamation20_02.html and study 1 Corinthians 8 and 10:23–33.

A. Conscience = voice of God + education.

B. Conscience may be misinformed.

C. We should never go against our conscience.

D. We sin when we cause a weaker brother to go against his conscience.

E. Our job is not to change behavior but to re-educate the conscience by the Word of God. Don’t urge transitioning Adventists to break the Sabbath, eat unclean foods, or do anything they feel is wrong until they are convinced by the Word of God that they are free to do so.

F. It takes time to do this.

III. Involve the Adventist in group discovery Bible studies as soon as possible.

A. Most Adventists feel they are superior in Bible knowledge. Do not confront this attitude. Rather, let them experience good, discovery group Bible studies with other Christians.

B. Adventists have two sources of “truth”—the Bible and the writings of Ellen White.

1. Many Adventists have read more of Ellen White’s writings than the Bible and in time these two often blend into one.

2. Transitioning Adventists will sooner or later come out with an “Ellen Whitism”—quoting Ellen White when they think they are quoting Scripture.

3. It is best if the TA discovers this rather than being confronted by others.

4. Be patient, but direct TAs to the Bible as the only source of truth.

C. Teach correct principles of hermeneutics. Following are some important highlights, pastors should add to these:

1. Adventism was founded on the proof-text method of Bible interpretation. Show how this is not a safe way to study. (See Cultic Doctrine p. 56-79 for a number of illustrations of proof-texting running wild.)

2. Teach contextual Bible study.

3. Teach inductive Bible study—study to discover not to prove.

4. Let the New Testament interpret the Old Testament.

5. Understand the difference between the old and new covenants and know the signs of each covenant. Sabbath in Christ will be an excellent reference for this.

6. Doctrine should come primarily from the Gospels interpreted by the Epistles.

7. Doctrine should seldom, if ever, come from the apocalyptic passages of Ezekiel, Daniel, and Revelation.

a) Where the Bible is clear we can and should be certain.

b) Where the Bible is unclear we must be tentative.

8. Doctrine should never be based on an isolated text.

9. Description is not prescription.

IV. Follow the right subject order

A. Start with the gospel. Some have been effective in starting at other places such as showing the errors of Ellen White, having the TAs read Galatians through in one sitting every day for 30 days, or having them read Cultic Doctrine—if they are willing to do that. But we generally feel it is best to start with the simple gospel. Do not, however, start with the topic of the Sabbath. For many Adventists, the Sabbath is the most cherished and important doctrine. It is at the very core of their theological paradigm. For many TAs it is unthinkable that Adventists could be wrong on the importance of Seventh-day Sabbath observance.

1. The gospel is often misunderstood in Adventism and the writings of Ellen White are confusing and self-contradictory on the gospel. There are six “gospels” being promoted in Adventism. (See Cultic Doctrine, p. 316-322 for an explanation of each of the following.)

    a. The gospel of example.

    b. The gospel of the feast keepers.

    c. The Great Controversy gospel (See also Cultic Doctrine, p. 235).

    d. The 1888 gospel.

    e. The gospel of progressive pluralism.

   f. The Pauline gospel of justification by faith alone—without renouncing Adventist errors which, in turn, undermines the gospel.

2. The gospel is the most important of all subjects.

3. Adventists are hungry for the true gospel.

4. The gospel itself will undermine the errors of Adventism.

5. The Holy Spirit works when the gospel is proclaimed.

6. Once a person is truly born again, the Holy Spirit will guide them into all truth.

7. How to determine if Adventists understand the gospel:

    a. Ask them to give you their testimony. Remind them that God has no grandchildren. Adventists often speak of “conversion” usually meaning conversion to the “truths of Adventism”. They seldom speak of      the new birth or being born again by the Spirit.

    b. What must one do to be saved?

    c. What must one do to remain saved?

  d. What must one do to be ready for Christ to come? If they are “good Adventists” they will have additions to the gospel in order to be ready for Christ to come.

    e. Ask the TA “Will you be lost if you leave the Sabbath, leave the SDA church, or eat unclean meat?”

    f. If in doubt, stay with the gospel.

8. Good gospel passages are:

    a. Luke 15.

    1) God searches for and accepts sinners who just wander away.

    2) God searches for and accepts sinners who get lost because of the carelessness of others.

    3) God accepts sinners who rebel against the Father’s love the minute they turn toward home.

    b. John 3, 4, 8

    1) Even theologians need to be born again. Drive home the truth of the necessity of the new birth. We         must be born again by the Spirit of God.

    2) Like the woman at Jacob’s well, God can save those who have a sinful lifestyle and an incomplete  understanding of theology if they accept Christ as their Savior. Once she received “the living water”— she left her water pot at the well—she became a successful evangelist in pointing others to Christ as the     Savior of the world.

    3) The gospel is good news for those who have been caught in the act.

    c. Luke 23:39–43. The gospel is good news for a dying sinner.

    d. Romans 3–6. Many excellent gospel passages here!

    e. Gospel articles in Proclamation! (Search by topic)

    f. Every book written by Dale Ratzlaff has a chapter or section dealing with the simple gospel.

B. Settle the issue of authority once and for all. The Bible must be the only source of truth, not Ellen White or SDA church doctrine.

1. The witness of Scripture: 2 Tim. 3:15, 16; Lk. 24:25–27; Jn. 10:35; 1 Jn. 5:13; Jn. 20:31; Rom. 10:17.

2. Point out the confusion in the writings of Ellen White on this topic:

a. “And while the Scriptures are God’s Word, and are to be respected, the application of them, if such application moves one pillar from the foundation that God has sustained these fifty years, is a great mistake.” Ellen White, Notebook Leaflets from the Elmshaven. Library, 1094, p. 157. Review the quote found under “E” on Page 2 of this outline.

The above quotes show that the early experience and teachings of Adventism are the plumb line for Adventist Bible interpretation.

b. “But God will have a people upon the earth to maintain the Bible, and the Bible only, as the standard of all doctrines and the basis of all reforms. The opinions of learned men, the deductions of science, the creeds or decisions of ecclesiastical councils, as numerous and discordant as are the churches which they represent, the voice of the majority—not one nor all of these should be regarded as evidence for or against any point of religious faith. Before accepting any doctrine or precept, we should demand a plain “Thus saith the Lord” in its support.” Ellen G. White, The Great Controversy, p. 595

    The above quote states that doctrine must come from the Bible alone. Adventists reconcile these two conflicting statements by ensuring that the Bible is to be interpreted in harmony with the Adventist experience and the teachings of Ellen White.

“…The historic sanctuary message, based upon Scripture and supported by the writings of EllenWhite, continues to be held to unequivocally. And the inspired authorities on which these and other doctrines are based, namely the Bible supported by the writings of Ellen White, continue to be the hermeneutical foundation on which we as a church place all matters of faith and conduct. Let no one think that there has been a change of position in regard to this. (See www.adventistreview.org/2002-154/story3.html)

3. Point out the confusion in SDA church doctrine. (See Cultic Doctrine, p. 274, 275). In the 1970s it became well known among informed Adventists that the 1844 Sanctuary doctrine could not be supported by the Bible. Rather than admit error, the church changed their doctrinal statements regarding “The Holy Scriptures” and “The Gift of Prophecy”.

Following are the subtle but major changes that were made:

a. The pre-1980 statement said that the Scriptures are “all sufficient” and are the “only” unerring rule of faith and practice.

b. The post-1980 (current, 2009) statement on “The Holy Scriptures” leaves out “all sufficient” and “only”.

c. The pre-1980 statement on “The Gift of Prophecy” states that Ellen White manifested the gift of prophecy, but does not say that her writings are a “source of truth.”

d. The post-1980 (current, 2009) statement for “The Gift of Prophecy” states that the writings of Ellen G. White “...are a continuing and authoritative source of truth...”

e. Now the Adventist church is left with the impossible task of trying to explain how the hundreds of foolish, erroneous, and contradictory statements made by Ellen White could possibly be a “source of truth”.

4. Confirm that the Bible is the only source of truth for your study.

5. Agree that Ellen White cannot be used for doctrinal authority.

6. As long as transitioning Adventists continue to read Ellen White or The Clear Word “Bible” they will not be able to clearly understand Scripture. This will be very hard for a “good Adventist” to accept. To help them understand this:

    a. Illustrate with Mormons. A Mormon is unlikely to leave Mormonism if he/she reads Joseph Smith          every day.

    b. Illustrate with Jehovah’s Witnesses. A  J.W. is unlikely to leave if they read the Watchtower every      day.

7. You may find Adventists who say the SDA church does not put Ellen White on the same level with Scripture. There are many statements in some of their books and periodicals that confirm that her writings are not used for doctrine or placed on the same level as Scripture.

    However, please refer to Cultic Doctrine, Appendix 4 for quotes from a number of SDA leaders which prove that many SDAs put Ellen White on the same level with the apostle Paul.

C. Show that the SDA’s 1844 Sanctuary Doctrine is without biblical support and that it undermines the gospel. Cultic Doctrine is the best book to deal with this subject.

1. Cultic Doctrine evaluates the SDA’s 1844 investigative judgment of sanctuary theology in five different ways.

2. Cultic Doctrine shows that the SDA church was built on massive error and deception.

3. Cultic Doctrine exposes many of the errors and heretical statements made by Ellen White.

4. Cultic Doctrine lists the 15 characteristics of a cult and shows how the SDA church meets most of them.

D. Study the Sabbath. This will be thoroughly discussed in the presentation entitled, “What about the Fourth Commandment?” I strongly recommend that you get Sabbath in Christ as it will answer every question a transitioning Adventist will ask. It has helped many thousands make a successful transition and remains our best seller. However, Adventists should read Truth Led Me Out or My Cup Overflows before reading Sabbath in Christ.

1. The topic of the Sabbath MUST be thoroughly understood:

    a. If you are going to have a ministry for transitioning Adventists.

    b. If you are going to keep your members from being caught in the enticing net of Adventist                        evangelism.

2. We have found that many, if not most, evangelicals, including evangelical pastors, are not well prepared to adequately answer all the questions an Adventist will ask on the topic of the Sabbath.

V. What the Evangelical pastor can expect in ministry to transitioning Adventists:

A. TAs will have a plethora of questions.

B. You may find that TAs have a different understanding of evangelical terms. Ask probing questions for clarification.

C. TAs may study the Bible with you and then without telling you, they may go back and study with an SDA pastor or friend and become confused. You may have to study the same topic several times. Be patient with them. It is not easy to change one’s whole paradigm of truth.

D. Once TAs have made the transition to your church, they may prove to be your most dynamic church members on fire for the gospel. We hear this time and again from evangelical pastors.

VI. Conclusion and summary:

A. Transitioning Adventists will have to face a number of other embedded errors. Once TAs understand the gospel, and attend a gospel-believing, Bible-teaching church, these will be discovered and dealt with in God’s own time.

B. Do not force the details of last-day events on TAs. Every view of eschatology is built on at least several assumptions. Our responsibility is to stay close to Christ, His word, and His church. God will be with us no matter which view turns out to be right.

C. Use the resources of Life Assurance Ministries:

1. Life Assurance Ministries, Inc., publishes Proclamation! a 24-page, full-color journal mailed bi-monthly free to about 30,000 homes.

    a. We do appreciate and depend on donations so we can continue this ministry.

    b. All back issues may be downloaded from: www.lifeassuranceministries.org.

    c. Has news of Former Adventist Weekends and ministry trips.

2. LAM Publications, LLC website is: www.lifeassuranceministries.com and:

    a. Publishes and sells books and CDs specifically designed to help transitioning Adventists.

    b. Has a number of important articles that may be downloaded for free.

    c. Has news of ministry appointments and presentations.

3. Direct transitioning Adventists to the Former Adventist Forum at:     www.formeradventist.com

    a. Transitioning Adventists have a real need to “talk through” the issues of leaving the SDA church.

    b. They can join the forum under a pseudonym if they wish.

c. Many Adventists, including Adventist pastors, “lurk” on this site reading the postings and responses before they start their transition.

4. On these websites you will find a number of links to other former Adventist sites. There is a wealth of material on the internet dealing with the errors of Adventism.

D. Understand the need for this ministry.

1. Approximately 300,000 Adventist members leave the SDA church every year.

2. Adventists are “programmed” by Ellen White and church doctrine to become agnostics when they leave Adventism. Review the fears listed at the beginning of this outline.

3. If SDAs visit a church that worships on Sunday, they do so with many fears. A Saturday night service often proves to be helpful to TAs.

4. If the pastor and members do not know how to answer their questions, and meet their unique set of needs, they may just give up on Christianity.

Note: We have been contacted by many who grew up in historic Adventist homes and became so discouraged because they felt they could never be good enough to get to heaven. Therefore, they gave up on Christianity, as they understood it. They concluded that if they were not going to heaven anyway, and there was no hell, then they might as well enjoy the pleasures of this world to the fullest as that would be all they could expect. In one way or another, however, God got their attention again. Some tell of how they just happened to see a Proclamation! or one of our books and started reading. Some heard the gospel for the first time in some other venue. After discovering the simple gospel, God’s grace drew them back into fellowship with Himself.

5. At Adventist prophecy lectures (they use many different names and seldom advertise that they are sponsored by Adventists) SDAs often baptize many evangelicals, even pastors.

E. Last but most important, pray for transitioning Adventists that they will fully understand and accept the simple gospel and be delivered from the false guilt and fears of Adventism.


















FEATURED POST

Bawal Ba O Pwede? The Truth About Timothy’s "Wine Prescription" 1 Timothy 5:3

"Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses." 1 Timothy 5:23 Ang daling m...

MOST POPULAR POSTS