Former Adventists Philippines Official Declaration Regarding the Law and the Covenants

Position Statement: The Christian and the Law of God

I. Preamble: The Covenants

The Distinction of Covenants: We affirm that God has related to humanity through different covenants in history. We believe it is vital to rightly divide the Word of Truth by distinguishing between the Old Covenant (mediated by Moses) and the New Covenant (mediated by Jesus Christ).

The Obsolescence of the Old: We believe that the Old Covenant, including the Mosaic Law, was a temporary tutor designed to lead Israel to Christ (Gal. 3:23-26). Upon the death and resurrection of Jesus, the Old Covenant in its entirety was rendered obsolete and has vanished away (Hebrews 8:13).

II. The Unity of the Mosaic Law

Rejection of Separation: We reject the theological division of the Law of Moses into distinct "moral" (Ten Commandments) and "ceremonial" categories, where one remains binding, and the other is abolished.

The "Package Deal": We hold that the Law of Moses is a unified code. To be under one part of the law is to be obligated to keep the whole law (Galatians 5:3; James 2:10). Therefore, since the ceremonial laws are no longer binding, the specific legal code of the Ten Commandments (as the terms of the Old Covenant) is also no longer the binding covenant document for the believer.

III. The Fulfillment in Christ

Christ as the End of the Law: We believe that Christ is the "end" (telos) of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Romans 10:4). Jesus did not merely explain the law; He fulfilled all its righteous requirements, types, and shadows.

The Ministry of Death: We acknowledge that the Apostle Paul describes the Ten Commandments (written on tablets of stone) as a "ministry of death" and a "ministry of condemnation" that had glory but has now been surpassed by the greater glory of the Spirit (2 Corinthians 3:7-11).

IV. The Believer’s Rule of Life: The Law of Christ

Not Lawless (Antinomianism): We strongly reject the accusation that freedom from the Mosaic Law gives license to sin. We are not without law toward God but are under the Law of Christ (1 Corinthians 9:21; Galatians 6:2).

The Law of Love: We believe the New Covenant standard is higher, not lower. It is grounded in the internal work of the Holy Spirit and summed up in the command to love God and love one's neighbor, as taught by Jesus and the Apostles.

Repetition in the New Testament: We affirm that nine of the Ten Commandments are reiterated in the New Testament as moral instructions for the church, not because they are in the Law of Moses, but because they reflect the eternal character of God, which the Law of Christ upholds.

V. The Sabbath and the Lord's Day

The Fourth Commandment: We hold that the command to keep the Seventh-day Sabbath was a sign specifically between God and the nation of Israel (Exodus 31:13) and a shadow of the rest we find in Christ (Colossians 2:16-17).

No Sacred Time: We believe that under the New Covenant, no day is intrinsically holier than another (Romans 14:5). The Sabbath command is the only one of the Ten not repeated as a command for the Church in the New Testament.

Christian Gathering: While we gather on the first day of the week (Sunday) to celebrate the resurrection, we do not view Sunday as a "Christian Sabbath" to be kept with legalistic strictness, but as a day of joyous corporate worship and fellowship.

Review Note for Leadership

This outline accomplishes three things necessary for FAP ministry:

• Protects against Legalism: It explicitly dismantles the Seventh-Day Adventists argument that the Ten Commandments are the "eternal standard" distinct from the law of Moses.

• Protects against License: It clarifies that you still believe in morality (the Law of Christ), preventing outsiders from calling you "lawless."

• Clarifies the Sabbath: It situates the Sabbath as a Covenantal Sign for Israel, not a Creation Ordinance for the Church.

The Nature of the Moral Law

Distinction from Traditional Covenant Theology

Former Adventists Philippines affirms a New Covenant Theology perspective, which differs significantly from the "Covenant Theology" articulated in historic confessions such as the Westminster Confession of Faith.

The Error of the Tripartite Division: We respectfully reject the traditional view that divides the Law of Moses into three distinct parts: Moral, Ceremonial, and Civil, where the "Moral Law" (defined as the Ten Commandments) is eternal and binding, while the others are abolished. We believe this division is artificial and foreign to the text of Scripture.

The Unity of the Old Covenant: Scripture treats the Law of Moses as a unified entity (the "Book of the Covenant"). The Ten Commandments were the summary terms of the Old Covenant (Exodus 34:28; Deuteronomy 4:13), not a separate, eternal moral code detached from the Mosaic administration. When the Old Covenant vanished (Hebrews 8:13), the entire legal code, including the Decalogue as a covenant document, was set aside to make way for the superior Law of Christ.

The Ten Commandments: A Negative Expression for Sinners

We believe that defining the Ten Commandments as "The Moral Law" is theological reductionism that fails to capture the fullness of God's eternal character.

Designed for the Lawless: The Apostle Paul instructs us that "the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate" (1 Timothy 1:9). The Ten Commandments are primarily a negative expression of morality ("Thou shalt not"), designed to restrain sin in a fallen nation and reveal the depth of human depravity (Romans 3:20).

Not the Ultimate Standard: While the Decalogue reflects God’s character, it is not the highest or fullest expression of it. A list of prohibitions is insufficient to describe the positive, active righteousness required of the New Creation. For example, one can technically refrain from murdering (keeping the 6th Commandment) while still hating one's brother in his heart. The Law of Christ demands the positive: "Love your enemies" (Matthew 5:44).

The True Moral Law: The Universal Law of Love

We affirm that the true, eternal "Moral Law" is not a list of ten rules on stone tablets, but the Universal Law of Love which existed before Sinai and continues forever.

The Essence of God is Love: God is Love (1 John 4:8). Therefore, the eternal moral standard flows from His nature, not merely from the Mosaic legislation. The Westminster Catechism misses this mark by centering morality on the Decalogue rather than on the Two Great Commandments.

Love Fulfills the Law: Jesus taught that all the Law and the Prophets hang on two commands: Love God and Love Neighbor (Matthew 22:37-40). The Apostle Paul reiterates that "he who loves another has fulfilled the law" because "love is the fulfillment of the law" (Romans 13:8-10; Galatians 5:14).

Superiority of the New Covenant: The Ten Commandments were a shadow; the Law of Love is the substance. Under the New Covenant, the Holy Spirit writes this Law of Love directly onto our hearts (Hebrews 8:10; 2 Corinthians 3:3), empowering us to obey God not out of fear of a written code, but out of a transformed nature.

Summary of Our Position

Therefore, we teach that the believer is dead to the Law of Moses (Romans 7:4)—including the Ten Commandments as a covenant code so that we might be married to another, even to Christ. We are not under the "ministry of death written and engraved on stones" (2 Corinthians 3:7), but are alive in the Spirit, obeying the Law of Christ, which is the perfect law of liberty (James 1:25).

Why this matters for the Former Adventists Philippines:

Refuting the SDA Paradigm: SDAs argue, "If you throw away the Ten Commandments, you can murder and steal!" This statement proves that you have not thrown away morality; you have upgraded from the "negative shadow" (Don't Steal) to the "positive substance" (Love your neighbor).

Correcting the Reformed View: Many ex-SDAs drift toward Reformed Baptist or Presbyterian theology, but get confused when told "The Sabbath is still binding, just moved to Sunday." This statement clarifies that you do not hold to the Westminster view of the "Christian Sabbath."

References:

The Bible. English Standard Version, Crossway, 2001. (Note: This includes all direct and indirect citations used in the text, including Exodus 31:13, 34:28; Deuteronomy 4:13; Matthew 5:44, 17:1-9, 22:37-40; Romans 3:20, 7:4-6, 10:4, 13:8-10, 14:5; 1 Corinthians 9:21; 2 Corinthians 3:3-11; Galatians 5:3, 5:14, 6:2; Colossians 2:16-17; 1 Timothy 1:9; Hebrews 8:10-13; James 1:25, 2:10; and 1 John 4:8

The 1935 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/the-1935-constitution.

The 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines, www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/.

Westminster Assembly. The Westminster Confession of Faith. 1647. Banner of Truth Trust, 2018.
Westminster Assembly. The Westminster Shorter Catechism. 1647. Westminster Standards, Great Commission Publications, 2011.