Here is a point-by-point refutation of the claim that Constantine changed the Sabbath or signed the "first Sunday Law" in the way SDA conspiracy theories typically present it.
Point 1: The "Change" Happened Centuries Before Constantine
The Conspiracy Claim: The video likely argues that the early church kept the Saturday Sabbath until Constantine forced them to switch to Sunday in 321 AD.
The Refutation: This is historically false. Christians were already meeting on Sunday (the first day of the week) for nearly 300 years before Constantine was even born. They didn't do this because of Roman law; they did it to celebrate the resurrection of Jesus, which happened on the first day.
Biblical Proof: In Acts 20:7, the disciples came together to break bread on the "first day of the week." In 1 Corinthians 16:2, Paul instructs the church to set aside their offering on the "first day of the week."
Historical Proof: Early church fathers like Justin Martyr (writing around 150 AD, long before Constantine) explicitly wrote: "But Sunday is the day on which we all hold our common assembly, because it is the first day on which God... made the world; and Jesus Christ our Saviour on the same day rose from the dead."
Constantine didn't invent Sunday worship; he simply recognized a practice the church had already been doing for centuries.
Point 2: The Edict of 321 AD Was a Civil Holiday, Not a Religious Canon
The Conspiracy Claim: Constantine made a "Sunday Law" that forced everyone to worship on Sunday and made Saturday worship illegal.
The Refutation: Constantine’s Edict of 321 AD was a civil employment law, not a doctrinal church creed. It did not mandate "worship"; it mandated "rest" from work. The text of the law stated that magistrates and city people should rest on the "venerable day of the Sun."
Crucial Exception: The law explicitly exempted farmers. If this was a strict religious law meant to force a new Sabbath, why were farmers allowed to keep working? It was a practical law to create a bank holiday for the empire, much like how we have public holidays today. It didn't forbid people from worshipping on Saturday privately, nor did it tell them how to worship on Sunday.
Point 3: "Venerable Day of the Sun" vs. The Lord's Day
The Conspiracy Claim: Constantine used the phrase "Venerable Day of the Sun," proving he was forcing pagan sun worship on Christians.
The Refutation: Constantine indeed used the pagan name for the day. This was likely a political move to unify his empire. Pagans worshipped the Sun, and Christians worshipped the "Sun of Righteousness" (Jesus) on the same day (for different reasons).
However, Christians didn't need Constantine's pagan title to validate their worship. They called it the "Lord's Day" (Revelation 1:10). Just because the government gave the day a pagan name doesn't mean the Christians were worshipping the sun.
If the government declares "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas," does that mean Christians celebrating Christmas are suddenly pagans? No. We know who we are worshipping.
Point 4: The New Covenant Theology Perspective (The Law)
The Conspiracy Claim: Changing the Sabbath is the "Mark of the Beast" because it changes God's eternal Law (The Ten Commandments).
The Refutation: From a New Covenant Theology perspective, this argument falls apart because we are not under the Old Covenant law of Moses.
Colossians 2:16-17 says: "Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ."
The weekly Sabbath was a shadow pointing to the rest we have in Jesus. We don't need the shadow now that the Reality has come. We don't observe the Sabbath to be saved or to stay saved. The "Law of Christ" (Galatians 6:2) is about love and faith, not about maintaining the specific day of the week from the Old Covenant.
Point 5: The "Mark of the Beast" Misinterpretation
The Conspiracy Claim: Worshiping on Sunday is the Mark of the Beast mentioned in Revelation.
The Refutation: This relies on a "Futurist" interpretation of Revelation that ignores the original context. From a Partial Preterist view, much of Revelation (including the Beast) referred to the Roman Empire of the 1st Century (like Nero) and the persecution of the early church. The "Mark" was a contrast to the Jewish phylacteries (bound on head and hand), symbolizing allegiance to the state/emperor over God. It is a stretch to turn a symbol of political allegiance in the 1st century into a debate about "Saturday vs. Sunday" in the 21st century.
Conclusion
- The idea that Constantine "signed the first Sunday Law" to destroy the true Sabbath is a conspiracy theory that ignores history.
- Christians worshipped on Sunday 200+ years before Constantine.
- Constantine's law was a civil holiday, not a church doctrine
The New Covenant releases us from the strict shadow of the Sabbath day because Jesus is our true Rest.
Former Adventists Philippines
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
Former Adventists Philippines Association, Inc
SEC Registration No: 2025090219381-03
Help keep this content free for everyone. I am committed to sharing these truths and resources freely. If you have found value in my articles since 2021 and would like to partner with me in this ministry, your support on Ko-fi would be greatly appreciated. It helps cover the costs of maintaining this blog and creating new content.
❤️ Partner with me on Ko-fi
https://ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
No comments:
Post a Comment