Q: "Sa Revelation 18:2, sinabi na ang Babylon ay naging 'cage of every unclean and hateful bird.' Kung wala na ang distinction ng clean at unclean meats sa New Covenant, bakit tinawag pa rin silang 'unclean' ni John sa dulo ng Bible? Doesn't this prove na binding pa rin ang Leviticus 11?"
A: This is a classic example of category error. Ginagamit ng mga SDA ang verse na ito para i-backdoor ang dietary laws sa New Testament, pero if we look at the context—specifically through the biblical lens the argument actually falls apart.
Narito ang point-to-point refutation:
1. The Language of Desolation, Not Diet
In Revelation 18:2, John is using Judgement Imagery or a "Desolation Motif." Binabanggit ang mga "unclean birds" (tulad ng vultures o owls) hindi para sabihing bawal silang kainin, kundi para ipakita na ang Babylon (referring to the apostate system/Jerusalem in the 1st century context) ay naging wasteland.
Sa Old Testament (Isaiah 13:21, 34:11-15; Zephaniah 2:14), kapag ang isang city ay hinatulan ng Diyos, ang description ay pinamamahayan ito ng mga wild, "unclean" animals. It symbolizes spiritual ruin and abandonment, not a dietary manual.
2. Physical Existence vs. Covenantal Law
New Covenant Theology reminds us that the physical nature of an animal doesn't change, but our covenantal relationship to it does. Under the New Covenant, the distinction between clean and unclean animals for food has been abolished (Mark 7:19; Acts 10:15; 1 Timothy 4:3-5).
John calls them "unclean" because technically, according to the Old Covenant categories they were familiar with, they were the "unclean" types of birds. However, using the term to describe a scene of judgment doesn't mean the ceremonial law is still binding on the believer’s conscience.
3. Spiritual Symbolism: "Unclean Spirits"
Notice the parallel in the same verse: "Babylon the great is fallen... and is become the habitation of demons, and the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird."
Ang context dito ay spiritual pollution. Ang mga "unclean birds" ay ginamit as a metaphor for demons and evil spirits. John is using Jewish imagery to explain a spiritual reality. To force a "pork and shrimp" argument into a passage about the fall of a demonic system is a massive reach.
4. The Fulfillment of the Law
Under New Covenant Theology, the Law of Moses (including the dietary code) was a tutor (Galatians 3:24-25) that pointed to Christ. Once the Reality (Christ) came, the shadows (clean/unclean meat) passed away. Revelation 18:2 doesn't "re-activate" the shadows; it simply uses familiar prophetic language to describe the judgment of those who rejected the Gospel.
Real Talk Reflection
"For the kingdom of God is not meat and drink; but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost." Romans 14:17
Huwag tayong magpaligaw sa mga legalistic interpretations na pilit ibinabalik ang mga anino ng lumang tipan. The New Covenant is about the heart and the finished work of Christ. If you are in Christ, you are clean not because of what you eat, but because of His blood.
Call to Action: Stop looking for "unclean birds" in your kitchen and start looking for the "New Jerusalem" in your spirit. Focus on the substance of the Gospel, not the symbols of a bygone covenant.
FORMER ADVENTISTS PHILIPPINES
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
Former Adventists Philippines Association, Inc
SEC Registration No: 2025090219381-03
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
Partner with me in advancing this ministry. Be part of this mission! Your support helps us continue gospel-centered outreach and resources.
• GCash: 0969-514-3944
• PayPal: paypal.me/formeradventistsph
• Ko-Fi: ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
No comments:
Post a Comment