Introduction: When an Unbreakable Covenant Meets an Unshakeable Savior
For centuries,
Christians have repeated a familiar assumption: the Ten Commandments remain in force, even if the rest of the Law of
Moses has passed away. But what if this assumption, so widely accepted, so
rarely questioned, creates a theological impossibility? What if the very idea of
separating the Ten Commandments from the covenant they belong to is not only unbiblical but actually undermines the
finished work of Christ?
Imagine standing at
Sinai, watching God carve His covenant into stone. Now imagine declaring that
this covenant, the one Scripture calls the
covenant itself, has ended… while insisting its core remains in effect. No
ancient Israelite would recognize such a claim. Neither would Paul. Neither
would the writer of Hebrews.
What follows is not a
dismissal of God’s moral will, nor an argument for antinomian freedom. It is a
call to take Scripture at its word: the Law of Moses was a single covenant, the
Ten Commandments were its covenant document, and Christ fulfilled the entire
covenant—not just pieces of it.
To treat the Ten
Commandments as eternally binding covenant law after Christ is to create
contradictions that Scripture never asks us to carry. And it risks placing the stone
tablets in a position Scripture reserves for Christ Himself.
1.
Foundation: A Law Cannot Be Partly Abolished and Partly Binding
Scripture presents the
Law of Moses as a single, inseparable covenant, not a piecemeal collection of
“moral,” “ceremonial,” and “civil” components that can be kept or discarded at
will. The Bible never invites us to slice the covenant into categories. It speaks
of one covenant given at Sinai.
Israel entered into one
unified covenant, which included:
·
The Ten Commandments
engraved on stone
·
All ceremonial
regulations
·
All civil and judicial
statutes
And Scripture explicitly
declares the stone tablets to be “the
words of the covenant” (Ex. 34:28; Deut. 4:13).
If the Mosaic covenant has been fulfilled, then everything that belongs to that covenant has been fulfilled, including its covenant document. Once a covenant is rendered obsolete, its core cannot remain in force.
A covenant cannot die while its foundation lives.
2.
The Ten Commandments Were the Covenant Document Itself
The Bible does not
portray the Ten Commandments as a morally superior appendix to the Mosaic
covenant. They are the covenant.
They form its legal backbone and covenant identity.
·
The Ten Commandments
were placed inside the Ark—the
covenant document in the most literal sense.
·
Ceremonial and civil
laws were placed beside the Ark as
expansions and applications.
Scripture calls the
tablets:
·
“the covenant itself” (Deut. 4:13)
·
“the tablets of the covenant”
(1 Kings 8:9)
To say the covenant has
ended, yet its document remains binding, is a contradiction of the highest
order, like claiming:
“The Constitution has been canceled, but its Articles remain law.”
This collapses both
logically and biblically.
3.
The Ten Commandments Are Not Exempt From Being Shadows
The New Testament makes
no exception for the Ten Commandments when it speaks of the fading, temporary
nature of the old covenant. It teaches that the entire Mosaic covenant,
including the tablets of stone:
·
was a ministry of death
(2 Cor. 3:6–7)
·
was a ministry of condemnation
(v. 9)
·
is the old covenant that is fading away (vv. 11, 14)
Paul explicitly refers to the writing on tablets of stone—the Ten
Commandments—as part of what is fading.
This means:
· The Ten Commandments belong wholly to the Old Covenant
·
The old covenant has
ended in Christ
·
The Ten Commandments
cannot remain as covenant law for Christians
Regardless of how we
categorize laws (moral, civil, ceremonial), Scripture treats the covenant as a
single unit, with the tablets as its epicenter—and that unit has passed away.
4.
If the Ten Commandments Remain Binding as Covenant Law, Then Jesus Is Not the
Final Revelation
Here is the crucial
point:
If the Ten Commandments
remain the supreme standard of moral authority after their covenant has ended,
then they:
·
outrank the New Covenant
·
survive the work of
Christ
·
continue binding
authority even when the rest of the covenant does not
This creates an
impossible implication:
·
Jesus fulfilled the
ceremonies
·
Jesus fulfilled the
sacrificial shadows
·
Jesus fulfilled the
civil regulations
·
but supposedly not the covenant document itself
In that scenario, the
Ten Commandments become:
·
more enduring than
Christ’s fulfillment
·
more authoritative than
His covenant
·
a higher standard than
His teachings
·
a moral authority
independent of His work
This directly
contradicts the New Testament proclamation that:
·
Jesus is the full
fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets
·
Jesus inaugurated a new
covenant
·
Jesus gives a new law
written on hearts
·
Jesus is God’s final
revelation (Heb. 1:1–2)
If the Ten Commandments
remain binding as covenant law, then Christ has not fulfilled the Law, because
the very core of that Law would still stand.
5.
The Danger of Keeping the Ten Commandments as the Christian Covenant Law
If Christians treat the
Ten Commandments as their ruling covenant code after Christ has fulfilled the
covenant, several dangers arise.
Problem 1: It Elevates Moses Above Jesus
If believers remain
under the code carved on stone, then the teachings of Jesus become supplemental
rather than supreme.
Problem 2: It Minimizes Jesus’ Fulfillment
If the heart of the
covenant remains in force, then Jesus fulfilled only its externals—not its
essence.
Problem 3: It Reverses the Direction of the Bible’s Story
Scripture’s trajectory
moves from:
·
law engraved on stone
·
to prophetic
anticipation
·
to Christ’s fulfillment
·
to the Spirit writing
God’s will on hearts
Returning to the stone
tablets is to drag revelation backward.
Problem 4: It Creates Competing Authorities
You end up with two
masters:
·
the tablets of Sinai
·
the law of Christ
6.
What Remains Is Not the Old Covenant Code but the Eternal Moral Will of
God—Revealed Fully in Christ
Jesus reveals:
·
a deeper moral reality
·
the true intention of
God’s righteousness
·
a law of love that
surpasses and fulfills the old
Jesus does not simply
restate Moses; He intensifies and transforms:
·
Not only “do not commit adultery,” but “do not lust.”
·
Not merely “love your neighbor,” but “love your enemies.”
·
Not simply “remember the Sabbath,” but “come to Me and find rest.”
And above all:
“Love as I have loved you.”
Thus:
·
We do not obey because
Moses commands
·
We obey because Christ
commands and the Spirit empowers
Christ Himself becomes
the standard.
7.
Final Summary: Why the Ten Commandments Cannot Remain the Christian Covenant
Law
Because:
·
They were the covenant
document of the Mosaic Law.
·
The Mosaic covenant has
been fulfilled and ended.
·
The tablets cannot
outlive the covenant they define.
·
Keeping them elevates
Moses above Jesus.
·
It implies the
covenant’s center was not fulfilled by Christ.
·
Jesus gives a fuller,
higher, final revelation.
·
The believer’s rule of
life is the law of Christ, written by the Spirit.
Otherwise, the Ten Commandments become more enduring, more authoritative, and more central than Jesus Himself, an unbiblical and Christ-diminishing conclusion.
Former Adventists Philippines
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

No comments:
Post a Comment