Sunday, November 30, 2025

Question: Pastor Ronald, ano po ang masasabi ninyo sa aral ng Pre-Adamic race at sa paniniwalang nagsasalita ang mga hayop noong panahon nina Adan at Eba?

Answer:

Magandang tanong ‘yan kasi ang “Pre-Adamic race” at ‘yung paniniwala na nagsasalita ang mga hayop noong panahon nina Adan at Eba ay mga ideya na matagal nang pinagdedebatehan ng mga teologo at Bible scholars.

Pag-usapan natin nang malinaw at patas para maunawaan kung saan nanggaling ang mga aral na ito at ano ang sinasabi ng Biblia tungkol dito.

Ano ang “Pre-Adamic Race”?

Ang “Pre-Adamic race” ay isang teorya o aral (hindi malinaw na turo ng Biblia) na nagsasabing may mga tao o nilalang na nabuhay bago pa si Adan at si Eba. Ang ideyang ito ay karaniwang ginagamit ng ilang Bible interpreters para ipaliwanag ang mga bagay tulad ng:

  • Bakit may mga “ibang tao” nang binanggit sa Genesis 4 (halimbawa, nang matakot si Cain na mapatay siya sa ibang mga tao pagkatapos niyang patayin si Abel – Genesis 4:14–15).

  • Ang posibleng “agwat ng panahon” sa pagitan ng Genesis 1:1 at Genesis 1:2 (tinatawag na Gap Theory), kung saan posibleng may ibang nilikha ang Diyos bago pa muling inayos ang mundo para kay Adan.

Ngunit:
Walang tuwirang talata sa Biblia na nagsasabing may “race” o lahi ng mga tao bago si Adan. Sa halip, malinaw sa Romans 5:12 at 1 Corinthians 15:45 na si Adan ang unang tao na nilikha ng Diyos, at sa kanya nagsimula ang kasalanan at kamatayan sa sangkatauhan.

“Kaya, kung paanong pumasok ang kasalanan sa sanlibutan sa pamamagitan ng isang tao…” (Romans 5:12) 

“Si Adan ang unang tao…” (1 Cor. 15:45)

Kaya kung titingnan sa pananaw ng mainstream Biblical doctrine, ang “Pre-Adamic race” ay teorya lamang, hindi itinuturo ng Biblia mismo.

Nagsasalita ba talaga ang mga hayop noong panahon ni Adan at Eba?

Ito naman ay galing sa Genesis 3, kung saan kinausap ng ahas (serpent) si Eba. Dahil dito, may ilan ang nagsasabing baka noon ay nagsasalita talaga ang mga hayop. Ngunit kung titignan mo nang maigi ang teksto:

Genesis 3:1

“Ang ahas ay ang pinakatuso sa lahat ng nilikhang hayop ng Panginoong Diyos. Sinabi nito sa babae…”

Hindi sinasabi rito na lahat ng hayop ay marunong magsalita. Ang kakaiba rito ay isang ahas lang ang nakipag-usap at ayon sa ibang bahagi ng Biblia, ito ay dahil ginamit ni Satanas ang ahas bilang kasangkapan niya para tuksuhin si Eba (tingnan Revelation 12:9).

Sa madaling salita:

  • Hindi normal na nagsasalita ang mga hayop noon.

  • Yung pangyayaring ‘yun ay isang espiritwal na interbensyon, hindi natural na kakayahan ng mga hayop.

Ano ang dapat nating aral na kunin dito?

Ang mga ganitong usapin (Pre-Adamic race, mga hayop na nagsasalita, atbp.) ay interesting at nakakapanabik pag-usapan, pero dapat tayong maging maingat na huwag gawing doktrina ang mga teorya na wala sa malinaw na katuruan ng Biblia.

Mas mahalaga na:

  • Alamin kung ano ang malinaw na sinabi ng Diyos sa Kanyang Salita.

  • Mag-ingat sa mga “bagong aral” na walang matibay na Biblical base.

  • Ituon ang ating pag-aaral sa layunin ng Diyos sa tao kaligtasan sa pamamagitan ni Kristo.


Ang “Gap Theory” o “Agwat na Teorya”

Ito ay isang interpretasyon ng Genesis 1:1–2, na nagsasabing baka may mahaba o hindi tinukoy na panahon (gap) sa pagitan ng dalawang talatang ito.

Genesis 1:1–2

  1. “Nang pasimula’y nilikha ng Diyos ang langit at ang lupa.”

  2. “Ngunit ang lupa ay walang anyo at walang laman; at ang kadiliman ay nasa ibabaw ng kalaliman…”

Ang sinasabi ng mga naniniwala sa “Gap Theory”:

  • Sa Genesis 1:1, nilikha na raw ng Diyos ang buong sanlibutan kasama ang mga nilalang, marahil kabilang ang “Pre-Adamic race.”

  • Sa pagitan ng talata 1 at 2, may nangyari maaaring isang paghuhukom o pagkawasak (dahil sa pagkahulog ni Satanas).

  • Pagdating sa Genesis 1:2, muling inayos ng Diyos ang mundo kaya ang “creation” na binasa natin mula Genesis 1:3–31 ay re-creation, hindi unang paglikha.

Kaya nga ito tinatawag na Gap isang pagitan ng dalawang yugto ng kasaysayan bago pa man si Adan.

Mga Suportang Talata (na madalas nilang gamitin):

  • Isaiah 45:18 — “Hindi Niya nilikha ang lupa na walang laman, kundi upang tirahan.”

    Sinasabi nila, kung hindi ito nilikha “walang laman,” bakit Genesis 1:2 ay “formless and void”?

  • Jeremiah 4:23–26 — naglalarawan ng isang lupang “walang anyo at walang laman,” parang ginunaw.

    Ginagamit ito para sabihing baka may “unang pagwasak” bago kay Adan.

Ngunit sa kabilang panig…

Ang maraming Bible scholars ay hindi sumasang-ayon sa Gap Theory, dahil:

  1. Walang malinaw na talata na nagsasabing may ganitong “unang mundo.”

  2. Sa orihinal na wikang Hebreo, ang Genesis 1:2 ay hindi nagpapahiwatig ng kasunod na pagkawasak, kundi simpleng paglalarawan ng mundo bago ito binigyan ng porma at buhay.

  3. Ang Romans 5:12 at 1 Corinthians 15:45 ay malinaw: si Adan ang unang tao, at sa kanya nagsimula ang kasalanan kaya kung may “Pre-Adamic race,” saan papasok ang kasalanan nila?

Buod: Ano ang pinakaaral dito?

Usapin Biblical Base Konklusyon
Pre-Adamic race Wala sa Biblia, speculative lamang Hindi itinuturo ng Scripture
Gap Theory Interpretative lamang sa Genesis 1:1–2 Posible pero hindi malinaw
Nagsasalitang hayop Genesis 3, Ahas lamang Espiritwal na pangyayari, hindi natural
Satan as serpent Revelation 12:9, 20:2 Ginamit ang ahas bilang instrumento

Panghuling Aral:

Ang ganitong mga paksa ay maaaring magpalalim sa ating pagkaunawa sa Kasulatan, pero kailangan nating maging mapanuri:

“Saliksikin ninyo ang mga Kasulatan… at subukin kung ang mga bagay na ito ay totoo.” (Gawa 17:11)

Mas mahalaga kaysa alamin kung may “Pre-Adamic race,” ay kilalanin ang layunin ng Diyos sa kasaysayan ng tao ang kaligtasan sa pamamagitan ni Kristo, ang “ikalawang Adan” (1 Cor. 15:45–47).

FAP Sunday School Lesson for November 30, 2025 — "The Joy of Prayer" Philippians 4:4–7; Acts 16:25–26


Opening Prayer

Lord, today we come before You with open hearts. Teach us to find joy even in our tears, and peace even in our storms. As we learn to pray through every situation, let our souls rest in Your presence. In Jesus’ name, Amen.

Scripture Reading

Philippians 4:4–7; Acts 16:25–26

“Rejoice in the Lord always. I will say it again: Rejoice! Let your gentleness be known to everyone. The Lord is near. Do not be anxious about anything, but in every situation, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which surpasses all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.”
(Philippians 4:4–7)

“About midnight, Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God, and the prisoners were listening to them. Suddenly, there was such a violent earthquake that the foundations of the prison were shaken. At once all the prison doors flew open, and everyone’s chains came loose.” (Acts 16:25–26)

Prayer and Rejoicing Go Together

My dear friends, in the life of a believer, joy is not a feeling; it’s a faith posture. It’s not based on what we see, but on who we trust. Paul wrote these words while he was in prison, not in comfort, but in chains. Yet his heart sang:

“Rejoice in the Lord always… Do not be anxious about anything…”

See, prayer and joy walk hand in hand. When we pray, joy is born. When we rejoice, prayer comes alive. Even in suffering, we don’t deny our pain; we bring it before the Lord. Because in His presence, tears turn into trust, and heaviness becomes hope.

Paul and Silas: Singing in Chains

At midnight, after being beaten and bound, Paul and Silas didn’t complain. They prayed and sang hymns.

“About midnight, Paul and Silas were praying and singing hymns to God…”

That was not denial, that was defiant joy. Joy that says, “Even here, I will praise my God.” And then, suddenly, the ground shook. The chains broke. The prison doors opened. Beloved, when joy and prayer come together, heaven moves. The joy of two wounded men became the key that unlocked not only their chains but also the hearts of others.

Joyful Prayer Is a Witness

When we pray with joy, we declare:

  • “God is still good.”

  • “Hope is still alive.”

  • “Even here, even now, I will rejoice.”

Joyful prayer doesn’t ignore pain; it transforms it. It turns prisons into sanctuaries. It turns fear into peace.

“And the peace of God, which transcends all understanding, will guard your hearts and minds in Christ Jesus.”

To those who’ve grown weary, or who’ve seen prayer as duty or guilt, remember this: Prayer is not a burden; it’s a blessing. It’s not only where we ask, but it’s where we rejoice. You don’t need perfect circumstances to rejoice; you just need a present Savior. And when you pray, you’re not just speaking, your soul is singing.

Prayer Shifts Our Focus

Prayer doesn’t just express our burdens; it lifts our eyes. When life presses in, prayer helps us see beyond the prison walls and notice that God is still there. Paul and Silas didn’t wait for freedom to sing. They worshiped in the midnight hour. Their praise didn’t begin with deliverance; it began with adoration. And something powerful happened, their focus shifted from pain to Presence. Later, Paul would write again:

“Rejoice in the Lord always… by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving…”

This wasn’t theory. This was his testimony. He had learned that joy is not the absence of pain, but the presence of God in the middle of it.

So when you pray, remember:

  • It’s not denial — it’s defiant hope.

  • It’s not pretending — it’s trusting.

  • It’s not escaping — it’s encountering the One who holds you.

You may be in your midnight season, but prayer can turn your midnight into a melody. When you lift your voice, heaven listens… and sometimes, the earth shakes.

Peace Beyond Understanding

Our world often says peace comes when problems disappear. But Scripture says otherwise. True peace, the kind that Paul talks about, is not the peace of perfect circumstances, but the peace of a present Savior. From a cold prison cell, Paul wrote:

“Do not be anxious about anything… and the peace of God will guard your hearts and minds…”

This peace is not fragile, it’s fierce. It doesn’t crumble when life gets hard; it stands guard over your heart. Paul and Silas had this peace. Their bodies were hurting, but their hearts were resting. Even in chains, they were free because peace doesn’t depend on your surroundings; it depends on your Savior. And that peace became a testimony. The prisoners listened. The jailer’s heart was moved.

Dear one, God’s peace is not just a feeling; it’s a fortress. It whispers to you: “God is near. God is listening. God is working even when you don’t see it.” You may not understand the why of your suffering, but you can know the Who of your peace. His name is Jesus.

Prayer Becomes Testimony

Prayer is not just communication; it’s a proclamation. When Paul and Silas prayed and sang, the whole prison heard. They didn’t preach with words; they preached with worship. And when the earthquake came, the jailer’s heart opened. He fell down and said, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” See how God turned their midnight song into someone’s morning salvation? When you pray through pain, you may not realize it, but someone is listening. Your song in the storm might be the sound of hope for another soul. Your midnight prayer could be the spark that lights someone’s dawn of redemption. So keep praying. Keep singing. Heaven is moving, and someone is listening.

Discussion

  1. How can we keep joy in prayer during trials?

  2. What does it mean that peace “guards” our hearts?

Summary & Closing Prayer

Prayer is not an escape; it’s an encounter. It is where joy is renewed, peace is restored, and testimony is born.

Let’s pray:
Lord, teach us to pray with joy, even in pain. Let our worship rise in the midnight hour. Guard our hearts with Your peace, and let our prayers become a light to those still in darkness. In Jesus’ name, Amen. 


Former Adventists Philippines

“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

FAP Sunday Service: "The Supreme Name Above All Names" Philippians 2:9-11

Thursday, November 27, 2025

Question: "Pastor Ronald, maaari po bang ipaliwanag kung bakit itinuring ni Pablo sa 1 Corinto 13 na mas dakila ang pag-ibig kaysa sa lahat ng spiritual gifts?"


Answer:

Napakaganda ng mga tanong mo kapatid malalim ang iyong pagninilay sa mga sulat ni Pablo. Tama ka: ang 1 Corinto 13 ay nasa gitna ng mga kabanata 12–14, na pawang tungkol sa mga spiritual gifts (mga kaloob ng Espiritu). Ngunit sa gitna ng usapin ng mga kaloob, isinisingit ni Pablo ang kabanata 13 upang ipakita na ang pinakadakila sa lahat ay hindi ang anumang gift kundi ang pag-ibig.

Tara, himayin natin ang bawat tanong mo nang malinaw at may kontekstong biblikal 

1) Anong uri ng pag-ibig ang tinutukoy ni Pablo sa 1 Corinto 13?

Ang salitang ginamit ni Pablo dito ay “agape”, isang salitang Griyego na nangangahulugang pag-ibig na kusang nagbibigay, walang hinihinging kapalit, at nakaugat sa kabutihan at kalooban ng Diyos.

Hindi ito eros (romantikong pag-ibig) o philia (pagkakaibigan), kundi divine love ang uri ng pag-ibig na ipinakita ng Diyos sa atin sa pamamagitan ni Cristo.

“Sapagkat gayon na lamang ang pag-ibig ng Diyos sa sanlibutan...” (Juan 3:16)

Sa madaling sabi:

Ang agape love ay hindi damdamin, kundi isang desisyon na magmahal, kahit mahirap, kahit walang kapalit, kahit hindi karapat-dapat ang minamahal.

2) Bakit sinabi ni Pablo na walang saysay ang mga kaloob kung walang pag-ibig?

Tingnan mo ang 1 Corinto 13:1-3. Sabi ni Pablo, kahit marunong kang magsalita ng mga wika ng tao o ng mga anghel, kahit may propesiya, kaalaman, at pananampalataya na makapagpapalipat ng bundok kung walang pag-ibig, wala itong kabuluhanBakit? Dahil ang layunin ng mga kaloob ay paglilingkod at pagpapalakas ng katawan ni Cristo (ang iglesya). Kung walang pag-ibig, ang mga gifts ay nagiging pansarili, mapagmalaki, at hindi nakakapagpatibay ng iba. Kumbaga, pwede kang maging magaling na mangangaral, mang-aawit, o tagapagturo pero kung ang puso mo ay hindi puspos ng pag-ibig, hindi ito kalugod-lugod sa Diyos.

3) Nangangahulugang ba na kapag may spiritual gift pero walang pag-ibig, hindi ito katanggap-tanggap sa paglilingkod?

Oo tama ang pagkaunawa mo. Ang isang kaloob ay galing sa Espiritu (1 Cor. 12:4-11), pero ang paggamit nito ay dapat may tamang puso. Kung ginagamit ito sa pagmamataas, pagkakampi-kampi, o paghangad ng papuri ng tao hindi ito katanggap-tanggap sa Diyos. Ang Diyos ay hindi lang tumitingin sa gawa kundi sa motibo ng puso.

“Ang tao ay tumitingin sa panlabas, ngunit ang Panginoon ay tumitingin sa puso.” (1 Samuel 16:7)

Kaya kahit may gift ka, kung walang pag-ibig sa likod nito, hindi ito nakalulugod sa Diyos.

4) May kinalaman ba ang Mateo 7:21-23 sa tinutukoy ni Pablo sa 1 Corinto 13?

Oo, may malalim na koneksyon. Sa Mateo 7:21-23, sabi ni Jesus:

“Hindi lahat ng tumatawag sa akin ng ‘Panginoon’ ay papasok sa kaharian ng langit... Marami ang magsasabi, ‘Panginoon, di ba kami’y nanghula, nagpalayas ng demonyo, at gumawa ng mga himala sa iyong pangalan?’ Ngunit sasabihin ko, ‘Hindi ko kayo kilala.’”

Ang punto ni Jesus ay maaaring gumawa ng mga “makapangyarihang bagay” sa ngalan Niya, ngunit kung walang tunay na relasyon at pag-ibig sa Kanya walang kabuluhan. Ito mismo ang sinasabi ni Pablo sa 1 Corinto 13: Ang mga gawaing espiritwal ay walang saysay kung wala ang agape love na bunga ng tunay na relasyon kay Cristo.

5) Paano malalaman ng isang mananampalataya kung ano ang kanyang spiritual gift para sa ministry?

Magandang tanong ito at praktikal. Narito ang ilang hakbang:

  1. Manalangin – Hilingin sa Diyos na ipakita ang iyong kaloob. (Santiago 1:5)

  2. Basahin ang mga listahan ng gifts – tulad ng sa 1 Corinto 12, Roma 12, at Efeso 4.

  3. Subukan maglingkod sa iba’t ibang paraan – minsan malalaman mo ang iyong kaloob sa pamamagitan ng karanasan.

  4. Pakinggan ang feedback ng ibang mananampalataya – madalas nakikita nila kung saan ka epektibo.

  5. Tingnan saan ka puspos ng kagalakan at bunga – kung saan ka naglilingkod nang may galak at nakikita ang bunga, doon madalas naroon ang gift mo.

6) Ibig bang sabihin mas hindi magmamaterialize ang gifts without love (1 Cor. 14:1)?

Tama! 1 Cor. 14:1 — “Pakamitin ninyo ang pag-ibig at buong sikap ninyong hangarin ang mga kaloob na espiritwal.” Ibig sabihin, ang pag-ibig ang dapat maging pundasyon ng paggamit ng gifts.

Kung walang pag-ibig:

  • Ang propesiya ay magiging panunumbat.

  • Ang pagtuturo ay magiging pagyayabang.

  • Ang pangunguna ay magiging pagmamando.

  • Ang musika ay magiging pagtatanghal lamang.

Ngunit kung may pag-ibig:

  • Ang lahat ng gifts ay nagiging daluyan ng biyaya ng Diyos sa iba. 


Buod:

Tema Kahulugan
Uri ng pag-ibig Agape, pag-ibig na sakripisyal, mula sa Diyos
Walang saysay ang gifts kung walang pag-ibig Dahil ang layunin ng gifts ay maglingkod, hindi magmalaki
Gift + walang pag-ibig Hindi kalugod-lugod sa Diyos
Kaugnayan sa Mateo 7:21-23 Gawaing espiritwal na walang tunay na pag-ibig at relasyon kay Cristo ay walang kabuluhan
Pagkilala sa sariling gift Panalangin, pagsubok, at pagkilala ng simbahan
Pag-ibig bilang pundasyon Pag-ibig ang nagbibigay-buhay at direksyon sa lahat ng gifts

Wednesday, November 26, 2025

Midweek Prayer Meeting: Galatians 6:1-10 Ptr. Romeo Ramoran

What Is the Kingdom of God? — From a Partial-Preterist & Postmillennial Perspective


In many churches today, discussions about the “Kingdom of God” often focus on a dramatic future: the Lord’s return, a thousand-year reign, and a glorious millennium on earth. However, from the vantage point of Partial Preterism, especially when combined with the hopeful outlook of Postmillennialism, the Kingdom of God is not solely a distant promise but a present reality unfolding in history.

Partial Preterism: a brief introduction

Preterism (from Latin praeter, meaning “past”) is a way of reading biblical prophecy that holds that many or in some cases all of the prophecies about “last days” have already been fulfilled. 

  • Partial Preterism says that a majority of New Testament prophecies, especially those in the prophetic sections of the gospels (e.g., the Olivet Discourse) and many visions in the Book of Revelation, were fulfilled by the first century, culminating in the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70. 

  • At the same time, Partial Preterism maintains orthodox Christian hope: there remains a future, bodily return of Christ, a final resurrection, and a last judgment. 

Thus, Partial Preterism seeks a balanced hermeneutic: fulfilled prophecy where Scripture leads, but future consummation where Scripture promises.

The Kingdom of God as “Already-But-Not-Yet”

For Partial Preterists, the Kingdom of God is not merely a future dream; it is already present, active, and growing. Many prophecies once thought to point to an eschatological future have found their first fulfillment in history; yet the final consummation remains ahead. As one recent summary puts it: “partial preterism sees the Kingdom as already present and growing.” 

Indeed, passages such as “the kingdom of God is in your midst” (cf. Luke 17:21) acquire a concrete, fulfilled meaning: Christ inaugurated His reign, and through His resurrection and the coming of the Holy Spirit, the reign of God began in, with, and through the people of God. 

In this view, the Kingdom is not a far-off realm but a present reality: Christ reigns now, his gospel is advancing, and the people of God are instruments of that reign. Over time, as the gospel permeates societies and cultures, the rule of Christ expands.

Compatibility with Postmillennialism: Hopeful, Historical, Evangelistic

When Partial Preterism is paired with Postmillennialism, the picture becomes both historic and hopeful.

  • Postmillennialism believes that Christ’s kingdom, inaugurated at His first coming, will progressively extend through history as the gospel spreads, the church grows, and Christian influence permeates societies.

  • According to this view, before Christ’s visible return, there will come a long era figuratively “the millennium,” in which righteousness, peace, and godliness increasingly shape human affairs. 

  • Then, at the end of this golden era, Christ will return bodily, followed by general resurrection and final judgment. 

Hence, combining Partial Preterism with Postmillennialism offers a unified eschatological framework: many prophecies have already been fulfilled, the Kingdom is currently expanding, and the final consummation still awaits.

Why This View Is More Biblical and More Hopeful than Others

  1. Faithfulness to historical context and apostolic audience. Partial Preterism honours the original context of prophetic warnings (such as those in the Olivet Discourse or Revelation). When Jesus or John spoke of coming judgment or “this generation,” this view takes seriously their likely reference to first-century events, not arbitrarily postponing them to distant future centuries.

  2. Confidence in fulfilled prophecy builds trust in divine faithfulness. By seeing how prophecies were concretely fulfilled, for example, in AD 70, believers can say with assurance that God’s word is reliable. As some writers put it, recognizing fulfilled prophecy “strengthens our trust” that God “did exactly what He said He would do.” 

  3. Avoids speculative futurism and endless waiting. Many eschatological models keep believers in suspense, expecting sign after sign, trying to “decode” world events as fulfillments. In contrast, the Partial Preterist–Postmillennial view grounds hope in history and in the present mission: the Kingdom is already among us, and we participate in its growth.

  4. Gives active purpose to Christian life and mission. If the Kingdom is already present and growing, then Christians today have a meaningful role: preaching the gospel, discipling nations, bringing justice and mercy, working for societal transformation, confident that over time, Christ’s reign can shape culture, law, values, and institutions. That aligns with the Great Commission and gives hope for real social progress under Christ’s sovereignty.

  5. Preserves orthodox future hope. Unlike more radical “full-preterist” positions (which claim all prophecy already happened and deny a future bodily return, resurrection, or final judgment), Partial Preterism retains the core of Christian hope: the visible return of Christ, final resurrection, and eternal destiny. 

An Invitation: Consider This View in Your Studies and Research

If you are studying theology, church history, biblical prophecy, or Christian mission, I encourage you to give serious attention to the Partial Preterist + Postmillennial framework.

  • Explore early-dating theories of Revelation (why some scholars believe the book was written before AD 70).

  • Re-examine prophetic texts such as the Olivet Discourse, the book of Revelation, and Old Testament prophecies in their historical context.

  • Reflect on how the Kingdom of God might already be growing in your community, your nation, and around the world.

  • Ask how this perspective might shape Christian mission, social engagement, hope, and ethics.

In doing so, you may discover that the Kingdom of God is not only a future hope waiting beyond the clouds but a present reality transforming hearts, communities, and nations.

Conclusion

From the lens of Partial Preterism, the Kingdom of God is already here: inaugurated by Christ, manifested in the Church, unfolding in history. When embraced with Postmillennial optimism, this view becomes deeply hopeful and mission-oriented: God’s reign is advancing, and we are its agents. This dual affirmation that prophecy can be fulfilled, and yet hope remains, grounds eschatology in history, faith, and responsibility.

Tuesday, November 25, 2025

Adventist Minds in Conflict: The Great Controversy Today

Mga kapatid, I write this with love, gentleness, and deep respect. Many of us came from the same pews, the same Sabbath school rooms, the same potlucks. We were shaped by the same teachings, the same culture, the same strong desire to “be faithful.”

But as Former Adventists, we also carry this burden: to speak honestly about the conflict many Adventists quietly carry inside the struggle between striving for salvation and resting in Christ.

Today, let’s talk about something very close to the Adventist heart:

Does keeping the Sabbath give assurance of salvation?

Many believe—whether openly or silently—that yes, it does. But Scripture lovingly says otherwise.

The Hidden Pressure Every SDA Feels

If you grew up Adventist, you know the feeling:

  • “Am I ready for Jesus to come?”

  • “Have I kept the Sabbath properly?”

  • “Did I obey the Ten Commandments this week?”

  • “What if I fail the final test?”

This internal “checklist spirituality” is very common. It’s the unspoken culture. Adventists are taught that in the last days, the Sabbath is the “seal of God,” and that those who do not keep it will receive the “mark of the beast.” Naturally, this creates fear. Anxiety. Pressure. And for many, no assurance. But the Bible teaches something radically different.

The Bible Never Says the Sabbath Gives Assurance of Salvation

Let’s say this plainly and lovingly:

  • No verse in Scripture says Sabbath keeping saves a person.
  • No verse says assurance comes from law-keeping.
  • No verse says the final test of salvation is a day of worship.

Instead, the Bible teaches:

• We are saved “by grace… through faith… not of works” (Ephesians 2:8–9).

Sabbath keeping is work. An obedience. A practice. Beautiful, yes. But not a basis for salvation.

• “We have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).

Peace comes from Christ. Not the Sabbath. Not the Ten Commandments. Not obedience.

• Jesus Himself is our Sabbath rest (Hebrews 4:9–10).

The “rest” that saves us is a Person, not a day.

The Assurance the Adventist System Cannot Give

The Adventist framework teaches conditional salvation:

  • You are saved as long as you obey.

  • You are accepted as long as you overcome.

  • You are safe as long as you remain sinless “through Christ’s power.”

  • You are secure as long as you keep the Sabbath faithfully.

This is not an assurance. This is probation. And deep inside, many Adventists know it. But assurance in the Bible is not conditional like this.

True Assurance Is Found in Christ Alone

Here’s the beautiful truth, kapatid:

Assurance is not: “I kept the Sabbath.”

Assurance is: “Jesus kept righteousness for me.”

Assurance is not: “I obeyed the Ten Commandments.”

Assurance is: “Christ fulfilled the law perfectly.” (Romans 10:4)

Assurance is not: “I did my part.”

Assurance is: “It is finished.” (John 19:30)

Sabbath keeping may be meaningful as a tradition, a rest, a reminder. But it will never give peace with God. Only Christ can do that.

Why This Matters So Much Today

Adventists love talking about the “great controversy.” But the greatest controversy today is this:

Is my hope in Christ’s finished work…

Or in my obedience to the law?

Even the Pharisees obeyed the law strictly. But they missed the Savior standing in front of them. Paul warned the Galatians about this very danger:

“Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?” Galatians 3:3

Sabbath is not the issue. The gospel is.

Dear Adventist Friend, Please Hear This with Love

You are not saved because you rest on Saturday.
You are not saved because you avoid pork.
You are not saved because you returned the tithe faithfully.
You are not saved because you kept the Ten Commandments better than others.

You are saved because:

Jesus Christ died, was buried, and rose again for you. 1 Corinthians 15:1–4

The Adventist church often says, “We don’t believe in works salvation.” But culturally and practically, many feel they must earn God’s approval.

This is the conflict.
This is the burden.
This is why so many Adventists secretly feel insecure about salvation.

But Jesus offers something Adventism cannot:

Complete security.
Complete forgiveness.
Complete rest.

A Gentle Invitation

Kapatid, if you feel tired from trying to be “good enough”…
If you feel anxious every time the word “judgment” is mentioned…
If you feel pressured to prove your faithfulness by Sabbath keeping…

Please know:

Jesus is enough.

Jesus is your assurance.
Jesus is your rest.
Jesus is your salvation.

Not Sabbath.
Not obedience.
Not performance.
Just Jesus.

Monday, November 24, 2025

“Why Holding to the Sabbath May Mean Letting Go of the Savior (Without Realizing It)?”


“Therefore, do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ.” — Colossians 2:16–17

The Beauty of the Shadow and Its Purpose

In the Old Covenant, God gave Israel a rhythm of sacred time: Sabbaths, feasts, and ceremonies. These were beautiful shadows, divinely designed to point forward to a greater Reality. The weekly Sabbath, in particular, was a reminder of God’s rest after creation and a symbol of His promise of redemption and rest for His people.

But shadows, though precious, are not the person. They are outlines, silhouettes cast by the presence of something or someone greater. The Sabbath pointed to a Person, not merely a day. It pointed to Jesus Christ, who is the Lord of the Sabbath (Matthew 12:8), the One who gives true rest to weary souls (Matthew 11:28–30).

The tragedy is that it’s possible to fall in love with the shadow and miss the substance. Just as Israel once revered the temple but rejected the God who dwelled in it, many today revere the Sabbath day but neglect the One it was meant to reveal.

The Fulfillment of the Sabbath in Christ

When Jesus cried out, “It is finished!” (John 19:30), He completed the work that the Sabbath symbolized. The rest of God was no longer a weekly appointment but a spiritual reality. Through faith in Him, believers enter into a continual Sabbath rest (Hebrews 4:9-10). This is not about one day of the week, it’s about resting from our own works and trusting fully in His.

Colossians 2:16-17 is clear: Sabbaths were shadows; the reality (Greek: σῶμα, “substance”) belongs to Christ. The word “belongs” here shows possession; the shadow does not belong to us anymore; it belongs to the One who cast it.

To insist on holding the shadow as if the light had not yet come is to turn one’s back on the very One the Sabbath pointed to. That’s not rebellion; often it’s a misunderstanding, but the spiritual effect is the same: it implies that the cross was not enough, and that Christ’s finished work needs to be supplemented by ceremonial observance.

The Contrast with the Investigative Judgment

The doctrine of the Investigative Judgment, unique to the SDA tradition, teaches that since 1844 Christ has been examining the records of believers to determine whose sins are forgiven but not yet blotted out.

Yet Colossians 2:14 declares something gloriously different:

“He blotted out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us... nailing it to His cross.”

Notice the past tense: He blotted out. Not “He will blot out.” Not “He began to blot out in 1844.” The cross was decisive. Our sins were not only forgiven but also removed from God’s record once and for all (Psalm 103:12; Hebrews 10:17–18).

If our sins are already blotted out, then the shadow system of judgment and probation loses all meaning. To return to the shadow of the weekly Sabbath as a requirement or to the idea of ongoing judgment is to live as though the cross did not finish the work.

A Loving Plea: Don’t Settle for the Shadow

Dear friend, if you grew up cherishing the Sabbath, know this: God sees your sincerity. He delights in hearts that long to honor Him. But He also invites you into something even greater, not just a day of rest, but a Person of Rest.

The Sabbath was never meant to compete with Christ; it was meant to lead to Him. To cling to the Sabbath as binding under the New Covenant is to unintentionally say, “I still need the shadow because the substance has not yet come.” But the Light has come! (John 8:12) The reality has arrived, and His name is Jesus.

Let go of the symbol and hold fast to the Savior. Enter His rest by faith. The true Sabbath is not found from Friday sunset to Saturday sunset; it’s found from Calvary onward, where rest was purchased once for all.

Reflection and Prayer

Lord Jesus, thank You for being my true Rest.
Forgive me for clinging to symbols when You offer substance.
Teach me to rest, not in a day, but in Your finished work.
Help me to live each day in the light of Your grace,
rejoicing that my sins are already blotted out at the cross.
Amen.

Final Thoughts

When we understand the difference between shadow and substance, religion turns into a relationship, and rest turns into rejoicing. Let us honor the Sabbath’s purpose not by keeping the day as law, but by keeping the Lord as life.

“So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God... whoever has entered God’s rest has also rested from his works as God did from His.” Hebrews 4:9–10

FAP Commentary on SDA Sabbath School Lesson (November 15–21, 2025): Title: "“Heirs of Promises, Prisoners of Hope”"


Overview

This week’s Sabbath School lesson carries a message that touches every believer’s heart: we are heirs of God’s promises and yet, in this present world, we often feel like prisoners of hope.

The lesson reminds us that God’s children, like Abraham, Moses, and Paul, walked through seasons of waiting and testing. They held on to promises that seemed far away, yet their hearts stayed steady in faith. The call is clear: even when we cannot see God’s hand, we can still trust His heart.

The study gently invites Adventists to see that our hope is not built on what we can do, but on who God is, faithful, unchanging, and always near to those who trust in Him.

FAP Response

From a Former Adventist Perspective (FAP), this week’s message feels deeply familiar, that longing to believe God’s promises while wrestling with feelings of unworthiness or failure.

Many of us grew up hearing that hope depends on how faithful we are in keeping God’s covenant or commandments. We wanted to trust God completely, yet we often carried quiet fears: Have I done enough? Am I ready if Christ returns today?

The beauty of the gospel is that Jesus already answered those questions for us. In Him, the promises of God are not “maybe,” but “Yes and Amen” (2 Corinthians 1:20). We are no longer prisoners trying to earn hope; we are children living inside it.

The FAP reflection reminds us: our obedience flows from love, not from fear. Our hope is not a burden we must carry, but a light that carries us through dark places.

FAP Theological Conclusion

As believers, we are truly heirs of promise, not because of our performance, but because of God’s mercy. Our inheritance in Christ is secure not through the Sabbath, the law, or human perfection, but through the perfect faithfulness of Jesus Himself.

When Paul says we are “heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ” (Romans 8:17), he speaks of adoption, a love that cannot be undone. God’s promise is not something we must guard; it is something that guards us.

In Christ, we are free. We are no longer prisoners of rules, but prisoners of a greater love, a love that holds us even when our grip on faith feels weak.

So, to be a prisoner of hope is not to live in fear of losing it. It means being joyfully captured by the grace of God, a grace that never lets go.

Reflection for Former Adventists

Dear friend, maybe you’ve walked away from traditions that once shaped your faith, and now you are learning to breathe again in grace. This week’s lesson might bring both comfort and ache. You might remember the times you tried to “hold on to the promise,” not knowing the promise was already holding you.

Please remember:

  • You are still God’s child, fully loved and fully known.

  • You are not behind in faith; you are simply being led deeper.

  • You do not have to prove your worth to inherit what Jesus already gave you.

The promises of God are not locked behind a door of perfection; they are open wide through the cross. And your hope, once heavy with fear, can now rest in peace.

As heirs of promise, we walk forward not as prisoners of performance, but as beloved children of a faithful Father.


Former Adventists Philippines

“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

''Totoo bang binago ng Diyos ang Sabbath”

Sunday, November 23, 2025

Former Adventists Philippines Online Sunday Service | November 23, 2025

Saturday, November 22, 2025

“Pastor Ronald, hindi ba ‘cheap grace’ kung sinasabi mong namatay si Kristo para magpatuloy sa paglabag, imbes na sumunod tulad Niya?”



Narito ang orihinal na tanong mula sa isang Seventh-day Adventist, na ating sasagutin batay sa Biblia:

“NAKU bro Ronald V. Obidos, WHAT you are saying here is cheap grace.. Hindi po nagpakamatay lang si Kristo para ang taong tinubos niya ay magpatuloy lang sa paglabag sa kautusan dahil na perfect niya na ang pagsunod sa kautusan. As a christian we are supposed to be like Chrsit in our life. If Christ lives in us then we will become partakers of His divine nature bro at magiging masunurin tayo katulad ng pagiging masunurin niya sa Ama. He gave us that example, he overcame and we can overcome that too thru Him. Sabi nga sa Biblia, we can do all things tru Christ who strengthens me. Hindi manlalabag at mga suwail bro ang mga tunay na tagasunod ni Kristo o ng Diyos.. Hindi mabigat sa mga taong sumusunod ang moral law bro, mabigat lang iyan sa mga taong hindi sumusunod o wala sa kanilang puso ang pag ibig sa Diyos kaya ang pagsunod nila ay parang mabigat kasi wala sa puso.”

Answer:

Hindi “Cheap Grace” ang Tinuro ni Cristo Kundi Transforming Grace (at Hindi na Tayo Under the Old Covenant Law)

Bro, tama ka si Kristo ay hindi namatay para bigyan tayo ng lisensya na magpatuloy sa kasalanan. Ang tawag diyan ni Dietrich Bonhoeffer ay “cheap grace,” ibig sabihin grace na walang repentance, walang obedience, walang pagbabago.

Pero ang tunay na grace sa Biblia ay:

  • nagpapalaya,

  • nagbibigay-lakas, at

  • nagbabago ng puso.

At kasama rito ang katotohanan na hindi na tayo under ng Old Covenant 10 Commandments, dahil ito ay ibinigay kay Moises para sa Israel, at tinupad na ni Cristo nang perfect.

1) Ang 10 Utos ay para kay Moises at Israel bahagi ng Old Covenant, hindi para sa New Covenant Church.

Deuteronomy 5:2–3

“The LORD made a covenant with us at Horeb… not with our fathers, but with us, who are here alive today.”

Ibig sabihin: Hindi universal law ang 10 Utos, covenant law ito ng Israel.

2) Ang 10 Utos ay tinupad ni Cristo nang perfect dahil impossible para sa atin.

Matthew 5:17

“I came not to destroy the Law but to fulfill it.”

Greek: plērōsai (πληρῶσαι) = to complete/bring to its intended end.

Hindi tayo ang tutupad Si Cristo ang tumupad para sa atin, kasi alam Niyang hindi natin kayang i-perfect.

3) Walang sinuman ang nakaabot sa kaluwalhatian ng Diyos ang purpose ng Law ay ipakitang makasalanan tayo.

Romans 3:19–23

“By the works of the law no flesh will be justified…For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”

Greek: hysterountai (ὑστεροῦνται) = continually fall short.

Romans 3:20

“Through the law comes knowledge of sin.”

Greek: epignōsis (ἐπίγνωσις) = full awareness.

Kaya bro hindi ibinigay ang Law para tuparin, kundi para mahayag na makasalanan tayo, at kailangan natin si Jesus.

4) Under the New Covenant, hindi na tayo under sa 10 Utos.

Romans 6:14

“You are not under law but under grace.”

Greek: hypo nomon = under the jurisdiction/authority of Moses’ Law.

So malinaw: Under grace ≠ under Moses.

5) Galatians 5:18: Hindi compatible ang Holy Spirit-led life at ang Old Covenant Law.

Galatians 5:18

“If you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.”

Greek Exegesis:
“led by the Spirit” = ἄγεσθε (agesthe) = continually guided, ruled
“not under the law” = οὐκ ἐστὲ ὑπὸ νόμον

Clear implication:

Hindi puwedeng sabay:

  • Led by the Spirit, and

  • Obedience sa 10 Utos as covenant law

Either Holy Spirit ang guide mo OR Mosaic Law ang guide mo. Hindi sila compatible (Gal. 5:18).

Kaya mali talaga bro na mag-claim: “Tinutulungan ako ng Holy Spirit para sundin ang 10 Utos.” Hindi puwede, kasi sabi mismo ni Paul: Kapag led ka ng Spirit → automatically not under the Law. Ngayon, paano tayo nababago kung hindi sa 10 Utos? Through Transforming Grace.

6) “We can do all things through Christ” Siya ang nagbibigay ng lakas.

Philippians 4:13

“I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”

Greek: endynamounti (ἐνδυναμοῦντί) = empowered from within. Hindi sariling disiplina Christ in us.

7) “Partakers of the divine nature,” kaya nagbabago tayo.

2 Peter 1:4

“…that you may become partakers of the divine nature…”

Greek: koinōnoi (κοινωνοί) = partners/participants.
Hindi passive — kasama ka sa transformation.

8) Ang totoong born of God, hindi nagpapatuloy sa kasalanan.

1 John 3:9

“No one born of God makes a practice of sinning…”

Greek: poiein tēn hamartian = habitual, continuous sin. Hindi ibig sabihin perfect tayo pero hindi na lifestyle ang kasalanan.

9) Sa mga may pag-ibig sa Diyos, hindi mabigat ang kanyang utos.

1 John 5:3

“His commandments are not burdensome.”

Greek: bareiai = not heavy, not oppressive. Kaya tama ka bro mabigat lang para sa walang Spirit.

10) Si Cristo ang modelo ng obedience at Siya rin ang gumagawa nito sa atin.

Hebrews 5:8

“…He learned obedience…”

Greek: emathen = demonstrated by experience.

11) Grace itself teaches us holiness.

Titus 2:11–12

“For the grace of God… teaches us to deny ungodliness…”

Greek: paideuousa = disciplines, trains, shapes character. Ang grace mismo ang nagtuturo hindi ang 10 Utos.

SUMMARY

  • Cheap grace = forgiveness without repentance or obedience
  • True grace = forgiveness that transforms

At malinaw sa Biblia:

✓ Hindi na tayo under sa Old Covenant 10 Utos
✓ Ang 10 Utos ay para sa Israel sa panahon ni Moises
✓ Purpose ng Law ay ipakitang makasalanan tayo, hindi para i-perfect
✓ Si Cristo ang tumupad ng Law nang perfect para sa atin
✓ Under the New Covenant → Holy Spirit, hindi tablets of stone
✓ Galatians 5:18: Led by the Spirit → Not under the Law
✓ Hindi puwedeng sabay ang Holy Spirit at 10 Utos
✓ Transformation comes through grace and the Spirit, not Moses’ Law

Friday, November 21, 2025

How One Word Changed Theology: Comparing the 1888 and 1911 Editions of The Great Controversy

In the long and complex history of Adventist literature, few books have been as influential as The Great Controversy by Ellen G. White. For many believers, this book is not just a piece of religious writing; it is regarded as inspired counsel that shapes theological understanding and denominational teaching. However, what happens when the author herself changes the wording between editions? Can the addition of just one word alter the meaning, and even the theology, of a passage?

To explore this question, we turn to two editions of The Great Controversy: the 1888 edition and the 1911 edition. By comparing key textual differences, particularly in the chapter “A Warning Rejected,” we can observe how subtle editorial changes significantly influenced Adventist interpretation and the authority of Ellen G. White’s writings.

The Key Textual Difference

1888 Edition, “A Warning Rejected” (Page 383)

“...the truth and the approval of God, to form an unlawful alliance with the world. The message of Revelation 14 announces the fall of Babylon, must apply to religious bodies that were once pure and have become corrupt. Since this message follows the warning of the Judgment, it must be given in the last days, therefore it cannot refer to the Romish Church, for that church has been in a fallen condition for many centuries.”

1911 Edition, “A Warning Rejected” (Page 437 / Centennial Edition Page 383, 1950)

“...the truth and the approval of God, in order to form an unlawful alliance with the world. The message of Revelation 14 announces the fall of Babylon, must apply to religious bodies that were once pure and have become corrupt. Since this message follows the warning of the Judgment, it must be given in the last days, therefore it cannot refer to the Romish Church alone, for that church has been in a fallen condition for many centuries.”

At first glance, the change seems minor; only the word “alone” has been added. But this addition dramatically shifts the theological interpretation.

How One Word Changed the Meaning

In the 1888 edition, Ellen G. White’s statement appears to exclude the Roman Catholic Church from being identified as “Babylon” in Revelation 14. Instead, the term is applied to Protestant churches that have become spiritually corrupt. This interpretation placed the primary prophetic warning on Protestantism itself, suggesting that the churches which once upheld truth had now compromised with worldly powers.

However, in the 1911 edition, by inserting the single word “alone,” Ellen White effectively included the Roman Catholic Church once again in the prophetic symbol of Babylon, but now shared with other corrupt religious bodies. The implication was that both Roman Catholicism and apostate Protestantism together represented the fallen state described in Revelation.

This change aligned the text with what many Adventist teachers already believed that Babylon symbolized a broader spiritual apostasy led by the papacy but encompassing others as well.

The 1919 Bible Conference: A Shift in Orthodoxy

The significance of this editorial change came to light during the 1919 Bible Conference, where church leaders discussed doctrinal unity and the authority of Ellen G. White’s writings.

W. W. Prescott, one of the participants, noted that before The Great Controversy was revised, the 1888 version was “unorthodox on a certain point,” but after revision, it became “perfectly orthodox.” When questioned, Prescott explained that the 1888 version denied that Babylon could refer to the Roman Church, but the 1911 revision, through the addition of “alone,” corrected this.

“After the book was revised, although the whole argument remained the same, it said that it could not mean the Roman Church alone—just one word added.” W. W. Prescott

Prescott went on to express his discomfort, saying that no one should have had the right to make such a change. His statement reveals a deeper issue: if even minor wording alterations can modify doctrinal interpretation, how should readers assess the divine authority attributed to Ellen G. White’s writings?

More Examples of Doctrinal Adjustments

Another significant example of revision can be found in the discussion of the papacy’s “abolition.”

1888 Edition (Page 439):

“At that time when the papacy was abolished and the pope made captive by the French army, the papal power received its deadly wound, and the prediction was fulfilled.”

1911 Edition (Page 501):

“At that time the pope was made captive by the French army, the papal power received its deadly wound, and the prediction was fulfilled.”

In the 1888 version, Ellen G. White claimed that the papacy was abolished in 1798, a historical inaccuracy, as the papal institution never ceased to exist. The 1911 edition corrects this by removing the word “abolished,” presenting a more historically accurate statement. This shows that later editors or even Ellen White herself recognized the need to align her writing with historical reality.

What This Means for Readers and Theologians

The comparison between the 1888 and 1911 editions reveals more than just stylistic edits. It shows how even the smallest word changes can reshape interpretation, align doctrine, and influence how believers view prophetic authority. For Adventists, these revisions raise an important question: were these changes the result of divine inspiration, or editorial correction?

Whether one sees these edits as improvements or as problematic, it cannot be denied that The Great Controversy evolved over time, both linguistically and theologically. Understanding these differences helps modern readers approach the text with historical awareness, theological balance, and intellectual honesty.

Final Thoughts

The evolution of The Great Controversy from 1888 to 1911 demonstrates the delicate relationship between language, theology, and authority. When a single word can alter centuries of interpretation, readers are reminded that even inspired works exist within human history, shaped by context, understanding, and sometimes, revision.

For researchers, theologians, and readers of Adventist history, this comparison offers a valuable lesson in textual study and the power of language in shaping belief.


Former Adventists Philippines

“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Bible Study Guide for SDA#1: Understanding the Sanctuary and the Blood of Christ: 14 Biblical Questions and Answers


Introduction: A Call to Study the Truth About the Sanctuary

Dear friends and fellow Bible students,

Every Friday, as many prepare their hearts for the coming Sabbath, Former Adventists Philippines (FAP) invites you to join us in a thoughtful and prayerful journey through God’s Word. We call this our “Day of Preparation Bible Study,” a time to open the Scriptures and rediscover the wonderful truth about the biblical sanctuary, the message of the cross, and the finished work of Christ.

For many years, the topic of the sanctuary has been central to Adventist faith and identity. Yet, have we truly understood what the Bible teaches about it? Is the sanctuary in Daniel 8:14 the heavenly one, or does it speak about the earthly temple of Jerusalem, as fulfilled in history? These are vital questions, not to create division, but to lead us to a deeper and clearer understanding of the truth.

This study series aims to present the Word of God faithfully, comparing Scripture with Scripture and history with prophecy. Our desire is not to attack, but to enlighten and encourage every honest seeker to see how the sanctuary reveals God’s holiness, His justice, and His perfect salvation in Christ Jesus.

We invite you to read with an open heart, to pray for wisdom, and to let the Bible itself speak. May every “Preparation Day” become not only a time to rest from labor, but also a time to prepare our hearts not for a ritual Sabbath, but for an eternal rest in the finished work of our Savior.

“Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth.” — John 17:17


Question 1: What Does “Bear the Iniquity” Really Mean?

Answer:

In Scripture, the phrase “bear the iniquity” appears often, and it carries two distinct meanings depending on the context. Most frequently, to bear iniquity means to bear the punishment or penalty for sin that has not been forgiven. Leviticus 5:17 teaches,

“If a soul sin, and commit any of these things which are forbidden to be done by the commandments of the Lord; though he wist it not, yet is he guilty, and shall bear his iniquity.”

Here, bear iniquity clearly refers to suffering the consequence of one’s own sin. Other passages that show this sense include Leviticus 7:18; 19:8; Numbers 14:33-35; and Ezekiel 18:20.

The second and rarer meaning applies to priests. In that case, bearing iniquity means carrying the responsibility for atonement, ensuring that sin is properly removed through the blood of the sacrifice. Exodus 28:38 explains,

“It shall be upon Aaron’s forehead, that Aaron may bear the iniquity of the holy things, which the children of Israel shall hallow in all their holy gifts; … that they may be accepted before the Lord.”

So, in one usage, sinners bear their own guilt; in the other, priests bear responsibility to remove sin through sacrifice. Both meanings show that sin leads to death unless atonement is made.

In the New Testament, this truth points to Christ. Isaiah 53:6 says,

“All we like sheep have gone astray… and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all.”

2 Corinthians 5:21 adds,

“For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.”

Jesus bore not symbolic guilt but our real punishment, once for all. His bearing of iniquity happened on the cross, not inside a sanctuary.

Question 2: How Did the Priests “Bear Iniquity”?

Answer:

For priests, bearing iniquity meant accepting responsibility for correct atonement rituals, not physically carrying sins into a building. Leviticus 10:17 records Moses’ words:

“Wherefore have ye not eaten the sin offering in the holy place, seeing it is most holy, and God hath given it you to bear the iniquity of the congregation, to make atonement for them before the Lord?”

The priest “bore” the iniquity by ensuring the sacrifice was offered properly so that the people’s sins were forgiven. If he failed, he would “bear the iniquity” in the first sense, receiving judgment for neglect.

Numbers 18:1 gives further clarity:

“And the Lord said unto Aaron, Thou and thy sons and thy father’s house with thee shall bear the iniquity of the sanctuary: and thou and thy sons with thee shall bear the iniquity of your priesthood.”

This means responsibility, not contamination. The priests were guardians of holiness, not carriers of sin. Their duty was to protect the sanctuary from defilement, not to introduce it. Matthew Henry’s commentary summarizes: the priests “should bear the blame if the sanctuary be profaned.” Nothing is said about transferring sin into holy places.

In short, bearing iniquity for priests meant faithful ministry of cleansing, while Christ alone bore the penalty of sin itself.

Question 3: What Does Sacrificial Blood Actually Do?

Answer:

From Genesis onward, God taught that life in the blood is His appointed means of atonement. Leviticus 17:11 states,

“For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.”

Throughout Exodus and Leviticus, blood always cleanses and sanctifies; it never defiles. Exodus 12:13 records the first Passover:

“When I see the blood, I will pass over you.”

In every case, forgiveness was granted when the sacrifice died and its blood was presented. Leviticus 4:20 repeats the pattern:

“And the priest shall make an atonement for them, and it shall be forgiven them.”

The same words appear in Leviticus 5:10; 6:7; 19:22. The blood purifies, consecrates, and reconciles, never contaminates.

In the New Testament, the blood of Christ fulfills this perfectly.

  • Romans 5:9: “Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.”

  • Ephesians 1:7: “In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.”

  • Hebrews 9:14: “How much more shall the blood of Christ… purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God.”

No verse teaches that Christ’s blood pollutes heaven. Instead, it cleanses believers completely (1 John 1:7). The blood that redeems cannot defile.

Question 4: What Does the Sanctuary Reveal About God’s Holiness?

Answer:

Every part of the sanctuary was designed to reveal the glory and purity of God. Exodus 29:37 declares,

“Seven days thou shalt make an atonement for the altar, and sanctify it; and it shall be an altar most holy: whatsoever toucheth the altar shall be holy.”

Holiness flowed outward from God’s presence; nothing unclean could enter. Exodus 29:43-44 continues,

“There I will meet with the children of Israel, and the tabernacle shall be sanctified by my glory. And I will sanctify… both Aaron and his sons, to minister to me in the priest’s office.”

The priests and offerings were called most holy (Leviticus 6:25; 10:17). God’s presence sanctified, it did not absorb defilement. Isaiah 6:3-5 shows how awesome this holiness is: the prophet cried, “Woe is me!” simply by standing near the glory of the Lord. If mere vision of God’s holiness overwhelmed Isaiah, how could literal sin ever enter His dwelling?

Therefore, any idea that forgiven sins could defile God’s sanctuary contradicts the entire message of holiness in Exodus and Leviticus. When Christ offered Himself, His blood made us holy, not His Father’s throne unclean.

Question 5: Can Identical Rituals Have Opposite Results?

Answer:

In Israel’s yearly cycle, daily and yearly sacrifices followed the same sacred logic: blood cleansed and restored fellowship with God. The Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16) did not reverse that process; it completed it.

Leviticus 16:30 says,

“For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord.”

Nothing in the text suggests that previous atonements had defiled the sanctuary. Instead, the yearly service symbolically renewed total purity among God’s people.

Hebrews 9:12 interprets this typology:

“[Christ] by his own blood… entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.”

The same sacrifice that cleanses cannot simultaneously corrupt. God is consistent: His appointed blood removes sin; it never transfers it elsewhere to contaminate.

Question 6: How Were Willful Sins Dealt With in the Old Testament?

Answer:

The law of Moses clearly distinguished between sins of ignorance or accident and willful, deliberate sins. The first could be atoned for by sacrifice; the second required judgment and punishment.

Leviticus 4:2 shows the principle:

“Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, If a soul shall sin through ignorance against any of the commandments of the Lord… let him bring for his sin a young bullock without blemish unto the Lord for a sin offering.”

But Numbers 15:30–31 states a different rule:

“But the soul that doeth ought presumptuously… reproacheth the Lord; and that soul shall be cut off from among his people. Because he hath despised the word of the Lord… his iniquity shall be upon him.”

Deliberate sin brought punishment, not priestly atonement. The offender “bore his own iniquity.” The judicial system of Israel handled these willful sins (see Exodus 21:24; 22:20; Leviticus 20). Sacrifices were never meant to excuse rebellion; they taught repentance and faith.

In the New Testament, Hebrews 10:26-27 echoes this same truth:

“For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful looking for of judgment.”

Therefore, forgiveness requires humility before God, not presumption. The system of judges in Israel shows that atonement was for repentant hearts, not for hardened sinners.

Question 7: Does God Need Centuries to Examine Heavenly Books?

Answer:

The Bible teaches that God is omniscient, meaning He knows everything instantly. Isaiah 46:10 proclaims,

“Declaring the end from the beginning… My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure.”

Psalm 147:5 adds,

“Great is our Lord, and of great power: his understanding is infinite.”

Job 37:16 says,

“Dost thou know the balancings of the clouds, the wondrous works of him which is perfect in knowledge?”

In the New Testament, John 21:17 records Peter’s confession:

“Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee.”

Because God’s knowledge is complete, He does not require time to study or read records to know who is faithful. 1 John 3:20 assures us,

“God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things.”

Any concept of a lengthy heavenly review process should therefore be understood symbolically as a picture of divine justice, not a literal investigation limited by time. God’s decisions are always perfectly informed.

Question 8: How Should We Understand Daniel 8:9–14 and the Little Horn?

Answer:

Daniel 8:9–14 records a vision that has often been misunderstood, yet its historical fulfillment is clear when examined in light of Scripture and history. The “little horn” described here is best understood as Antiochus IV Epiphanes, a Seleucid ruler who severely persecuted the Jewish people and defiled the earthly temple in Jerusalem around 168 B.C.

The passage says:

“Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed” (Daniel 8:14).

The word translated cleansed (Hebrew tsadaq) means to make right or to restore righteousness. This prophecy pointed to the historical period when the Jewish temple defiled by Antiochus through idol worship and the sacrifice of swine would be cleansed and rededicated to the Lord.

This event took place in 165 B.C., when Judas Maccabeus and his followers recaptured Jerusalem, purified the altar, and restored proper worship. The Jews established a yearly celebration to commemorate this cleansing, known as the Feast of Dedication or Hanukkah. The Gospel of John itself confirms the historical remembrance of this event:

“And it was at Jerusalem the feast of the dedication, and it was winter. And Jesus walked in the temple in Solomon’s porch” (John 10:22–23).

Hanukkah, therefore, stands as a strong biblical witness that the cleansing of the sanctuary in Daniel 8:14 referred to the earthly temple, not to a heavenly one. The prophecy was already fulfilled centuries before Christ came in the flesh.

This interpretation aligns perfectly with history and language, and it refutes the idea that Daniel 8:14 speaks of a heavenly investigative judgment beginning in 1844. The historical context, the linguistic evidence (tsadaq = “to restore, vindicate”), and the celebration of Hanukkah all testify that this was about the restoration of the Jerusalem sanctuary after desecration, not about a future cleansing in heaven.

The lesson remains powerful: God’s holiness will always triumph over human defilement. Antiochus defiled the temple, but the Lord raised faithful men to restore it. In the same way, Christ, through His death and resurrection, brings true cleansing to the hearts of believers once for all. His finished work fulfills all that the earthly sanctuary foreshadowed, complete redemption, not continual cleansing.

Question 9: Did Atoned Sin Ever Enter the Sanctuary?

Answer:

The Bible never says that forgiven, atoned sin was transferred into God’s dwelling place. In fact, the opposite is emphasized: sin was removed by sacrifice, not stored inside the sanctuary.

Leviticus 16:16 explains the purpose of the Day of Atonement:

“And he shall make an atonement for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the children of Israel… that remaineth among them in the midst of their uncleanness.”

The sanctuary required cleansing because it stood among sinful people, not because forgiven sins had entered it.

Numbers 5:3 instructs:

“Both male and female shall ye put out… that they defile not their camps, in the midst whereof I dwell.”

And Numbers 35:34 warns,

“Defile not therefore the land which ye shall inhabit, wherein I dwell: for I the Lord dwell among the children of Israel.”

These verses show that impurity in the camp threatened God’s holiness, not blood applied in obedience. Blood always cleansed; it never polluted.

Therefore, the atonement’s purpose was to remove defilement caused by human sin, not to transfer that sin into sacred space. Christ’s blood, the perfect fulfillment of these symbols, “cleanseth us from all sin” (1 John 1:7).

Question 10: How Was the Earthly Sanctuary Actually Defiled?

Answer:

Scripture clearly identifies the cause of defilement: unatoned and unconfessed sin, not forgiven sin.

Leviticus 15:31 says,

“Thus shall ye separate the children of Israel from their uncleanness; that they die not in their uncleanness, when they defile my tabernacle that is among them.”

Numbers 19:13 confirms,

“Whosoever toucheth the dead body of any man that is dead, and purifieth not himself, defileth the tabernacle of the Lord.”

The sanctuary became unclean because of the people’s disobedience and impurity, simply by being in their midst. The yearly Day of Atonement cleansed what remained unacknowledged:

“For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you” (Leviticus 16:30).

This cleansing dealt with the residue of sin in the community, not with sins already forgiven. The sanctuary’s holiness represented God’s continual desire to dwell among a purified people. The lesson for believers is that holiness in God’s presence comes not from rituals but from a heart cleansed by Christ’s finished sacrifice. His blood does not transfer sin; it removes it forever.

Question 11: Was the Entire Sanctuary Cleansed on the Day of Atonement?

Answer:

Yes. The Scriptures teach that the entire sanctuary, not just one section, was purified during the Day of Atonement. Leviticus 16:18–20 describes the sequence:

“And he shall go out unto the altar that is before the Lord, and make an atonement for it… And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar, he shall bring the live goat.”

Leviticus 16:33 summarizes the scope:

“And he shall make an atonement for the holy sanctuary, and he shall make an atonement for the tabernacle of the congregation, and for the altar, and he shall make an atonement for the priests, and for all the people of the congregation.”

This verse shows that every part of the sanctuary, as well as the ministers and the people, was cleansed. The purpose was to remove the effects of Israel’s sinfulness from all areas of God’s dwelling.

This pattern points to Christ’s complete redemption. Hebrews 9:23–24 explains:

“It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things in the heavens should be purified with these; but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands… but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God for us.”

The “better sacrifice” purifies forever. Jesus’ atonement leaves no portion of God’s presence defiled. His blood secures eternal redemption and restores holiness everywhere God dwells.

Question 12: Must Every Sin Be Confessed Individually to Be Forgiven?

Answer:

Confession is essential to repentance, but the Bible also assures us that God’s grace goes beyond human memory. 1 John 1:9 gives a precious promise:

“If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

Notice that God not only forgives known sins but also cleanses from all unrighteousness. Because human beings are imperfect, we cannot recall every fault we have ever committed. Yet God’s forgiveness is complete for those who sincerely trust in Christ.

Psalm 103:12 celebrates this truth:

“As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us.”

Romans 8:1 adds,

“There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus.”

Forgiveness rests not on perfect recollection but on perfect redemption. Jesus’ sacrifice covers every sin past, present, and future for those who believe. His intercession guarantees continual cleansing, not continual condemnation.

Question 13: Can Satan Accuse Believers in God’s Presence?

Answer:

Scripture acknowledges that Satan is “the accuser of the brethren,” but it also declares that his accusations are defeated by Christ’s finished work. Revelation 12:10–11 describes the victory:

“For the accuser of our brethren is cast down, which accused them before our God day and night. And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony.”

Romans 8:33-34 comforts us further:

“Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God’s elect? It is God that justifieth. Who is he that condemneth? It is Christ that died, yea rather, that is risen again, who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us.”

Satan has no standing in the heavenly court because Jesus’ blood has satisfied every claim of justice. Christ’s presence before the Father secures the believer’s acceptance forever. So while Scripture uses courtroom imagery to illustrate judgment, we can be certain that no evil being literally stands beside God’s throne to contest our salvation. The victory is already won; the accuser has been overthrown.

Question 14: How Should We View William Miller’s Prophetic Mistake?

Answer:

William Miller, a 19th-century preacher, sincerely studied Daniel’s prophecies and concluded that Christ would return around 1843–1844. When this did not occur, the event became known as the “Great Disappointment.”

While Miller’s zeal was genuine, his interpretation of Daniel 8:14 proved incorrect. The Bible warns all believers to test prophecy carefully. Deuteronomy 18:22 instructs,

“When a prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken.”

Miller’s error reminds us of Jesus’ words in Matthew 24:36:

“But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.”

The lesson is humility in interpretation and dependence on Christ rather than on human calculations. God uses even our mistakes to draw us closer to the truth. Our hope must rest not in dates or predictions but in the unchanging promise of His return.

Conclusion: The Finished Work of Christ

The study of the sanctuary, sacrifices, and prophecy leads us to one glorious reality: the complete and finished work of Jesus Christ.

Hebrews 10:12 says,

“But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.”

When Jesus cried, “It is finished” (John 19:30), He declared that the full price for sin had been paid. His blood cleanses, sanctifies, and justifies once for all. The cross, not a continuing ritual, is the center of salvation.

Through Him, every believer may enter the presence of God with confidence:

“Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus… let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith” (Hebrews 10:19, 22).

The sanctuary message, when rightly understood, magnifies the holiness of God and the sufficiency of Christ. The true cleansing does not occur in a building but in the heart of every person who trusts Him.

Today, God invites all who seek forgiveness to rest in the finished work of His Son. There is no sin so deep that His blood cannot cleanse it, and no guilt so heavy that His grace cannot lift it. The Savior who bore our iniquity now offers us His righteousness.

“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow” (Isaiah 1:18).

May every reader find peace and assurance in that promise, and may our study of Scripture lead us not to fear but to faith in the One who has made us clean forever.


Former Adventists Philippines

“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

FEATURED POST

What Does “Eternal Generation of the Son” Mean?

The “Eternal Generation of the Son” is a classic Christian teaching that tries to explain a question many people have asked for centuries:  ...

MOST POPULAR POSTS