Coffee, Tea, and False Prophecy: Why Ellen G. White’s Claims Don’t Hold Up

If a “prophet” declares common foods and drinks to be spiritually dangerous—and modern evidence consistently shows net health benefits, what should we conclude? Short answer: the “prophet” isn’t speaking for God. That’s exactly the problem with Ellen G. White’s sweeping condemnations of coffee and tea.

What Ellen G. White actually taught

Ellen G. White didn’t merely say “go easy on caffeine.” She framed coffee and tea as intoxicants that damage the nerves and as a sin that injures the soul:

• “Tea acts as a stimulant and, to a certain extent, produces intoxication. The action of coffee…is similar…what seems to be strength is only nervous excitement.” (The Ministry of Healing, ch. 26) (Ellen G. White Writings, Ellen White Info)

• “Tea and coffee drinking is a sin, an injurious indulgence, which…injures the soul.” (Counsels on Diet and Foods, #741) (Ellen G. White Writings)

• “The Lord counsels the remnant church to discard…tea, and coffee.” (Counsels on Diet and Foods) (Ellen G. White Writings)

This is not nuanced health advice; it’s moral condemnation tied to her authority as God’s messenger.

What robust research shows

1) Coffee is associated with lower mortality, not higher.

Large prospective cohorts (hundreds of thousands of participants) repeatedly find that habitual coffee drinkers have reduced all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. These benefits appear with both caffeinated and decaf coffee, and across diverse populations. (New England Journal of Medicine, PubMed, BMJ)

2) Tea consumption is linked to better heart outcomes and longevity.

Prospective data (e.g., China-PAR project) associate regular tea intake—green or black—with lower risks of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. Randomized and controlled studies also show favorable effects on lipids and glycemia with green tea. (PubMed, Oxford Academic, PMC)

3) The cancer question was clarified years ago.

In 2016, the WHO’s IARC removed coffee from possible carcinogens and concluded there’s no conclusive evidence that coffee causes cancer. The main hazard is very hot beverages (>~65 °C), which can injure the esophagus—temperature, not coffee or tea per se. So let your drink cool. (IARC)

Bottom line: Moderate coffee and tea intake is generally compatible with good health for most adults; special cautions remain for pregnancy, certain cardiac/arrhythmia conditions, and those sensitive to caffeine—fair, responsible caveats never require calling your morning brew “sin.”

Why this matters theologically

1. Fact vs. prophecy.
   
   
   EGW’s categorical claims (coffee/tea produce “intoxication,” are “sin,” “injure the soul,” must be “discarded”) are falsified by broad, modern evidence of net health benefits and neutral moral status. A prophet speaking for the God of truth does not pronounce ordinary, God-created beverages sinful when data show the opposite. (See 1 Tim 4:1-5 on forbidding foods “which God created to be received with thanksgiving.”)

2. Moral inflation.
   
   
   Calling morally indifferent things “sin” binds consciences where Scripture does not (cf. Col 2:16–23; Rom 14:1–6). That’s not holiness; it’s legalism.

3. Moving the goalposts won’t fix it.
   
   
   Some say, “She spoke to her era.” Yet EGW didn’t offer tentative, time-bound advice; she spiritualized the prohibition (“injures the soul”). Truth from God doesn’t become false simply because science advances; God already knows the data.

4. Test of a prophet.
   
   
   Biblically, authoritative messengers don’t need editorial cleanup by later research. When a teacher’s categorical health/moral claims are repeatedly overturned, the claim to unique, binding revelation fails (Deut 18:20–22; Acts 17:11).

A sane, biblical posture on coffee and tea

• Christian freedom: Foods and drinks are received with gratitude (Mark 7:19; 1 Cor 10:31).

• Christian wisdom: Temperance is virtuous (Prov 25:16). If caffeine worsens your sleep, anxiety, reflux, pregnancy outcomes, or interacts with meds—limit or avoid.

• Christian charity: Don’t bind others’ consciences with extra-biblical rules (Rom 14).

Conclusion

Ellen G. White called coffee and tea “sin” and spiritually harmful. High-quality evidence says moderate intake is generally beneficial or neutral, and the WHO explicitly cleared coffee of carcinogenic status (cautioning only against very hot temperatures). The dissonance is stark. When a self-proclaimed prophet’s categorical pronouncements collide with reality and with Scripture’s teaching on Christian liberty, the verdict is clear: she was not speaking for God.

So take your coffee or tea—wisely, gratefully, and freely—to the glory of God. And measure every human teacher, EGW included, by the Word of God and honest truth. (IARC, New England Journal of Medicine, BMJ, PubMed)

Former Adventists Philippines

“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph