One of the questions that has stirred lively conversation among Calvinists, Arminians, and Adventists is this: when the Bible declares that Christ died “for the sins of the whole world,” does that mean that every single soul is automatically saved? Or is the text speaking of something far richer, yet more nuanced?
As always, the safest path is to compare Scripture with Scripture, and to let the whole counsel of God interpret the parts (Acts 20:27).
1. Colossians 1:20 — “All Things in Heaven and Earth”
Paul proclaims:
“And, having made peace through the blood of his cross, by him to reconcile all things unto himself; by him, I say, whether they be things in earth, or things in heaven.”
(Colossians 1:20, KJV)
At first reading, one might suppose Paul teaches that all, even unbelievers and fallen angels, are reconciled. Yet such a conclusion jars against other clear Scriptures: eternal punishment for the wicked (Matt. 25:46), the lake of fire for the devil and his followers (Rev. 20:10, 15). So what does Paul mean by “all things” (τὰ πάντα, ta panta)?
-
The scope of Christ’s reign. Nothing stands outside His lordship. As Paul reminds the Philippians, “every knee shall bow” (Phil. 2:10-11).
-
Cosmic reconciliation. Sin has corrupted not only human hearts but the whole creation (Rom. 8:20–22). Christ’s cross guarantees restoration, where even the heavens and earth are renewed (Rev. 21:1).
-
Not automatic salvation. The enemies of God are subdued, but not redeemed. Their defeat itself is part of Christ’s reconciling victory.
Thus, Colossians 1:20 speaks not of universal salvation, but of the cosmic breadth of Christ’s authority and the ultimate restoration of His creation.
2. 1 John 2:2 — “Not for Ours Only, But for the Whole World”
John writes:
“And he is the propitiation (ἱλασμός, hilasmos) for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world.”(1 John 2:2, KJV)
Why the emphasis on “the whole world”?
-
Against exclusivism. Some early Christians may have thought Christ died only for their own group. John pushes back: Christ’s sacrifice reaches beyond “ours.”
-
Universal provision. His atonement is sufficient for every human being—Jew or Gentile, slave or free, adult or infant. As Augustine observed, “The blood of Christ is of such worth that it could redeem a thousand worlds” (Tractates on the Gospel of John, 87).
-
Conditional application. Yet forgiveness applies only to those who believe (John 3:16; Acts 10:43). Think of a medicine: it is perfectly suited for every patient, but only heals those who take it.
So while the cross is universal in provision, it is particular in application.
3. Provision vs. Application
Here lies the biblical tension:
-
Provision is unlimited. Christ’s sacrifice is sufficient for all humanity.
-
The application is limited. Only believers receive the saving benefits.
This explains why the gospel can be sincerely preached “to every creature” (Mark 16:15). The offer is genuine, even though not all accept it.
Is it not comforting to know that when we look anyone in the eye, we can truthfully say, “Christ died for you”?
4. Why Colossians 1:20 ≠ Universalism
If “whole world” and “all things” meant automatic salvation for all, then:
-
Hell would stand empty—contradicting Revelation 20:15.
-
Warnings against unbelief and apostasy would lose meaning (Heb. 10:26–27).
-
Jesus’ sobering parables of judgment (Matt. 25:31–46) would collapse into metaphor.
Instead, Scripture teaches: Christ’s death is cosmically sufficient and universally offered, yet personally effective only through faith.
Conclusion
Yes, Christ died for the whole world. That means every nation, every tribe, every class of society, even the smallest children. His reconciling work stretches as far as the curse is found—touching heaven and earth, restoring creation itself.
And yet, the consistent voice of Scripture resounds: provision is for all, but reconciliation is by faith. As John 3:16 declares, “For God so loved the world… that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.”
So let us ask: if Christ’s death were not genuinely available to all, could the angels at Bethlehem have rightly announced, “good news of great joy which shall be for all people” (Luke 2:10)?
Notes
-
Augustine. Tractates on the Gospel of John. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 7. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1980).
-
Calvin, John. Commentary on Colossians 1:20. In Calvin’s Commentaries. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2005).
-
Moo, Douglas J. The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon. Pillar New Testament Commentary. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008).
-
Schreiner, Thomas R. New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2008).
-
Carson, D. A. The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2000).
-
Owen, John. The Death of Death in the Death of Christ. (Carlisle: Banner of Truth, 1959).
-
I. Howard Marshall. The Epistles of John. NICNT. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1978).
-
Beale, G. K. A New Testament Biblical Theology: The Unfolding of the Old Testament in the New. (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011).
-
Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994).
-
Vos, Geerhardus. The Pauline Eschatology. (Phillipsburg: P&R, 1979).
Former Adventists Philippines
No comments:
Post a Comment