Investigating the SDA Statement of Belief #10: "The Experience of Salvation"

SDA Statement of Belief #10:

The Experience of Salvation

"In infinite love and mercy God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God. Led by the Holy Spirit, we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Savior and Lord, Substitute and Example. This saving comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God’s grace. Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God’s sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin. Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God’s law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life. Abiding in Him, we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment. (Gen. 3:15; Isa. 45:22; 53; Jer. 31:31-34; Eze. 33:11; 36:25-27; Hab. 2:4; Mark 9:23, 24; John 3:3-8, 16; 16:8; Rom. 3:21-26; 5:6-10; 8:1-4, 14-17; 10:17; 12:2; 2 Cor. 5:17-21; Gal. 1:4; 3:13, 14, 26; 4:4-7; Eph. 2:4-10; Col. 1:13, 14; Titus 3:3-7; Heb. 8:7-12; 1 Peter 1:23; 2:21, 22; 2 Peter 1:3, 4; Rev. 13:8)."

Introduction

The Seventh-day Adventist statement on salvation contains much that aligns with historic Christian orthodoxy. However, as we investigate this belief through the lens of New Covenant Theology and careful exegesis, we'll discover significant concerns, particularly regarding the SDA framework's integration with their broader theological system, including Sabbatarianism, investigative judgment, and Ellen G. White's writings. Let's examine this statement point by point.

Point 1: "In infinite love and mercy, God made Christ, who knew no sin, to be sin for us, so that in Him we might be made the righteousness of God."

Agreement: This opening reflects 2 Corinthians 5:21 accurately and presents the biblical doctrine of substitutionary atonement and imputed righteousness.

Concern: While this statement is orthodox, we must ask how this relates to the SDA doctrine of investigative judgment (beginning in 1844). If we are "made the righteousness of God" in Christ through faith alone, why would our names require investigation in heaven's sanctuary to determine our salvation status? The investigative judgment doctrine fundamentally undermines the sufficiency of Christ's imputed righteousness.

Exegetical Note: Paul's Greek in 2 Corinthians 5:21 uses the aorist tense (ἐποίησεν, epoiēsen "he made"), indicating a completed action. Christ was made sin once for all. The righteousness we receive is God's own righteousness (τοῦ θεοῦ, tou theou), not a righteousness we progressively achieve or maintain through law-keeping.

Point 2: "Led by the Holy Spirit, we sense our need, acknowledge our sinfulness, repent of our transgressions, and exercise faith in Jesus as Savior and Lord, Substitute and Example."

Agreement: The Spirit's role in conviction (John 16:8) and the call to repentance and faith are biblical.

Concern: The phrase "Savior and Lord, Substitute and Example" subtly introduces a works-oriented framework common in SDA theology. While Jesus is certainly our example (1 Peter 2:21), placing "Example" coordinate with "Substitute" can blur the gospel. Christ's substitutionary work saves us; His example guides us as the saved. SDAs often emphasize Christ as an example to support Sabbath-keeping and Ellen White's health reform as part of sanctification necessary for salvation.

New Covenant Perspective: Under the New Covenant, we don't look to Christ merely as an example to imitate externally (keeping Sabbath, dietary laws), but as the One whose life is imparted to us by the Spirit (Galatians 2:20). The New Covenant promise is not "follow my example," but "I will put my law within them" (Jeremiah 31:33).

Point 3: "This saving comes through the divine power of the Word and is the gift of God's grace."

Agreement: Salvation by grace through the Word is biblical (Ephesians 2:8-9; Romans 10:17).

Concern: What constitutes "the Word" for SDAs? While officially affirming Scripture, SDAs treat Ellen G. White's writings as authoritative for faith and practice. Her writings are called "a continuing and authoritative source of truth" (SDA Fundamental Belief #18 in older formulations). This creates a dual-authority problem. If salvation comes "through the divine power of the Word," but Ellen White's writings are needed to properly understand that Word, then functional authority shifts away from Scripture alone.

Historico-Grammatical Issue: The Greek λόγος (logos) in passages about the Word (Romans 10:17; 1 Peter 1:23) refers to God's revealed message in Scripture, not extrabiblical prophetic writings. Adding Ellen White's writings as an interpretive authority violates the sufficiency of Scripture.

Point 4: "Through Christ we are justified, adopted as God's sons and daughters, and delivered from the lordship of sin."

Agreement: Justification, adoption, and deliverance from sin's dominion are core gospel truths (Romans 8:14-17; 6:14).

Concern: How does SDA theology understand "justified"? While they affirm forensic justification, their investigative judgment doctrine teaches that believers' works are examined to confirm their justification. This creates a two-stage justification: initial justification by faith, and final vindication based on works examination.

Exegetical Analysis: Romans 5:1 uses the aorist passive participle (δικαιωθέντες, dikaiōthentes) - "having been justified" indicating a completed state through faith. Paul declares, "There is therefore now no condemnation" (Romans 8:1). The Greek νῦν (nyn, "now") emphasizes present reality, not future investigation.

The SDA investigative judgment (based on Daniel 8:14's misinterpretation) contradicts the finished nature of justification. We are already delivered from condemnation (Romans 8:33-34).

Point 5: "Through the Spirit we are born again and sanctified; the Spirit renews our minds, writes God's law of love in our hearts, and we are given the power to live a holy life."

Agreement: The Spirit's work in regeneration (John 3:3-8), sanctification, and transformation is biblical (2 Corinthians 3:18; Romans 12:2).

Concern: The phrase "God's law of love in our hearts" references Jeremiah 31:33. But what law? SDAs insist this refers to the Decalogue, including the fourth commandment, Sabbath. However, the New Covenant context shows this is fundamentally different.

New Covenant Theology Perspective: Jeremiah 31:31-34 and its New Testament fulfillment in Hebrews 8:7-12 show that the New Covenant is not like the Old Covenant made at Sinai (Hebrews 8:9). The law written on hearts is the law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), the royal law of love (James 2:8), not the Mosaic covenant with its Sabbath sign.

Hebrew Exegesis: Jeremiah 31:32 explicitly states the New Covenant is "not like the covenant I made with their fathers." The Hebrew לֹ֣א כַבְּרִ֗ית (lo kabberit) emphasizes discontinuity. The New Covenant brings internalization of God's will through the Spirit, not mere reapplication of Sinai's stone tablets.

Greek Exegesis: In Hebrews 8:13, "In speaking of a new covenant, he makes the first one obsolete (πεπαλαίωκεν, pepalaiōken). And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away." The Mosaic covenant, including the Sabbath command as its sign (Exodus 31:13-17), has been superseded by the New Covenant in Christ's blood.

Continuationist Note: As Continuationists, we affirm the Spirit's ongoing work in believers today. The Spirit doesn't write the Mosaic law code on our hearts but produces His fruit (Galatians 5:22-23) and empowers us to fulfill the law's intent through love (Romans 13:8-10).

Point 6: "Abiding in Him, we become partakers of the divine nature and have the assurance of salvation now and in the judgment."

Agreement: Union with Christ (John 15:4-5) and participation in divine nature (2 Peter 1:4) are biblical. Assurance is God's will for believers (1 John 5:13).

Critical Concern: This is where the SDA statement becomes internally contradictory. They affirm "assurance of salvation now and in the judgment," but their doctrine of investigative judgment teaches that no one can have full assurance until their case is reviewed in heaven's tribunal (beginning 1844, ongoing).

The Investigative Judgment Problem: SDA theology teaches that since 1844, Christ has been examining the lives and works of professed believers in heaven's sanctuary to determine who remains justified. Ellen White wrote: "Those who are living upon the earth when the intercession of Christ shall cease in the sanctuary above are to stand in the sight of a holy God without a mediator" (Great Controversy, p. 425).

How can one have "assurance of salvation now and in the judgment" if Christ's mediatorial work will cease, and your case depends on the investigation of your works?

Biblical Response: Hebrews 7:25 states Christ "always lives to make intercession" for us. The Greek εἰς τὸ παντελὲς (eis to panteles) means "completely" or "forever." Christ's intercession doesn't cease. Romans 8:34 asks rhetorically, "Who is to condemn? Christ Jesus is the one who died more than that, who was raised, who is at the right hand of God, who indeed is interceding for us."

Assurance in New Covenant Theology: True assurance rests on Christ's finished work and God's covenant promise, not on examination of our works. Hebrews 6:17-19 describes God's promise as an "anchor for the soul, firm and secure." The investigative judgment undermines this anchor by making final salvation dependent on work examination.

Additional Biblical-Theological Concerns

The Sabbath Issue

While not explicit in this statement, SDA theology inextricably links salvation experience with Sabbath-keeping. Ellen White taught that the seventh-day Sabbath would become the final test of loyalty, and those who worship on Sunday would receive the mark of the beast (Great Controversy, chapters 25-26).

New Covenant Response:

• Colossians 2:16-17: "Therefore let no one pass judgment on you in questions of food and drink, or with regard to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath. These are a shadow of the things to come, but the substance belongs to Christ."
• The Greek σκιά (skia, "shadow") contrasts with σῶμα (sōma, "body/substance"). The Sabbath was a shadow pointing to Christ, our rest (Matthew 11:28-30; Hebrews 4:9-10).
• Romans 14:5-6 places Sabbath observance in the realm of Christian liberty, not a salvific requirement.

The Sanctuary Doctrine Foundation

The entire SDA theological system rests on its sanctuary doctrine, which claims:

1. The "2300 days" of Daniel 8:14 are actually 2300 years
2. These years ended in 1844
3. The "cleansing of the sanctuary" refers to Christ beginning investigative judgment in heaven

Exegetical Problems:

1. Daniel 8:14 Context: The Hebrew phrase בֹּ֖קֶר עָ֑רֶב (boqer erev) means "evening-morning," referring to the daily temple sacrifices disrupted by Antiochus IV Epiphanes (167-164 BC). The context is the little horn (Antiochus), not the Roman Empire or 1844.

2. No Biblical Support for 1844: No New Testament writer mentions investigative judgment or a delayed Day of Atonement fulfillment. Hebrews 9:12 states Christ "entered once for all into the holy places... by means of his own blood, thus securing eternal redemption." The Greek ἐφάπαξ (ephapax, "once for all") contradicts ongoing investigative work since 1844.

3. Hebrews' Finality: Hebrews 10:12-14 declares, "But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God... For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." Christ sat down (perfect completion). He didn't begin new judgment work in 1844.

Conclusion: Appearance vs. Reality

The SDA Statement of Belief #10 on salvation sounds evangelical and orthodox on the surface. However, when understood within their complete theological system, including investigative judgment, Sabbatarianism, Ellen White's prophetic authority, and end-time theology, this statement functions very differently than it appears.

Key Problems:

1. Justification undermined by investigative judgment requiring works-examination
2. Assurance compromised by the ongoing heavenly tribunal since 1844
3. New Covenant is misunderstood as a reinscription of Mosaic law, including the Sabbath
4. Christ's finished work is diminished by ongoing investigative ministry
5. Scripture's sufficiency challenged by Ellen White's interpretive authority

From a New Covenant Theology perspective, we affirm:

• Justification is by faith alone, complete at conversion, with no investigative review needed
• The Mosaic covenant (including Sabbath) has been fulfilled and superseded in Christ
• Believers have full assurance now based on Christ's finished work and God's promise
• The Spirit writes Christ's law of love on hearts, not the Decalogue as a code
• Scripture alone is our final authority

As Continuationists, we trust the Holy Spirit is actively at work today, bringing conviction, regeneration, and sanctification not through law-keeping or denominational distinctives, but through the gospel of grace in Christ.

The SDA statement on salvation requires the same approach we'd use in investigating any group's doctrinal statement: look beneath the orthodox language to the underlying theological framework. When we do, we find a system that, despite affirming grace, ultimately conditions final salvation on works-examination and denominational distinctives, particularly Sabbath-keeping and Ellen White's authority.

May we hold fast to the sufficiency of Christ's once-for-all sacrifice, the finality of His priestly work, and the assurance that belongs to all who are in Him by faith alone.

"For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast." (Ephesians 2:8-9)

Former Adventists Philippines

​“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Former Adventists Philippines Association, Inc
SEC Registration No: 2025090219381-03

Help keep this content free for everyone. I am committed to sharing these truths and resources freely. If you have found value in my articles since 2021 and would like to partner with me in this ministry, your support on Ko-fi would be greatly appreciated. It helps cover the costs of maintaining this blog and creating new content.

❤️ Partner with me on Ko-fi
https://ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos
Gcash# 09695143944 

PayPal: paypal.me/backtothescriptures

Ko-Fi: https://ko-fi.com/ronaldobidos