Which View of Salvation Is More Biblical: Calvinism or Reformed Arminianism?

Introduction: When Grace Meets Responsibility

Few doctrines divide the Christian world more sharply than the debate between Calvinism and Arminianism. Both claim to uphold the grace of God, yet they differ in how that grace operates in the process of salvation. Calvinists argue that God’s saving grace is irresistible and given only to the elect, while Reformed Arminians affirm that God’s grace is prevenient—freely given to all, yet resistible to those who reject it.

But let’s ask: What does Scripture actually teach? When we peel away the layers of theological tradition and return to the text, in its historico-grammatical context and original Greek meaning, does the Bible portray salvation as an exclusive privilege or a universal invitation?

Let’s journey through the Word.

---

I. The Greek of Grace: “Charis” That Appears to All

Paul writes in Titus 2:11,

“For the grace (charis) of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all men.”

The Greek term charis means unmerited favor, a free and divine enablement. The participle “appeared” (epephanē)—from which we get epiphany—implies a revelation that shines forth to everyone. There’s no grammatical limitation here; Paul uses pasin anthrōpois (“to all men”), not to the elect only.

So we ask: If grace only saves the elect, why does Paul use universal language?

A Reformed Arminian hermeneutic respects the historical context: Paul was writing to a mixed Gentile audience in Crete. The Cretans were known for their immorality (Titus 1:12), yet Paul declares that even these undeserving sinners have been visited by grace. This is prevenient grace—the grace that goes before salvation, enabling man to respond to God’s call without coercion.

Grace, therefore, is not an irresistible force that drags the unwilling; it is a divine invitation extended to all, but only transforming those who humbly receive it (John 1:12).

---

II. The Will of God: The Greek of Desire and Purpose

In 1 Timothy 2:4, Paul states that God “wills (thelō) all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth.”

The Greek thelō refers to an intentional will or desire, not a mere wish. If God’s will here were decretive (as Calvinists claim), then no one would be lost. But since Scripture clearly teaches that many reject salvation (Matt. 23:37), this must refer to God’s moral or salvific will—His gracious desire that all people repent and believe.

Here, the Reformed Arminian approach shines. We affirm that God’s will for all to be saved doesn’t mean all will be saved, but rather that His saving grace has been universally offered and freely accessible. God, in His sovereignty, chose to make salvation available to all, yet not force it upon all.

Would a God of love decree irresistibly that some must perish without a chance?

Or does He, in His wisdom, allow human freedom to dignify genuine love?

---

III. The Order of Salvation: Faith Before Regeneration

Calvinism asserts that a person must be regenerated before he believes—that one must be “born again” first to have the faith to respond. But this idea flips the New Testament order upside down.

Consider Ephesians 1:13:

“In Him, you also, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation—having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise.”

The participles in Greek are sequential:

1. Akousantes (“having heard”)

2. Pisteusantes (“having believed”)

3. Ephragisthēte (“you were sealed”)

Faith comes after hearing and before sealing. Paul’s syntax demolishes the Calvinist claim that regeneration must precede faith. The Holy Spirit seals the believer after he responds to the gospel—not before.

Let’s ask rhetorically: Does a dead man believe before being raised, or does faith itself open the door to new life? The Arminian says—biblically—that God’s prevenient grace awakens, convicts, and enables, but the sinner must respond in faith.

This aligns with Christ’s own teaching in John 6:44—“No one can come to Me unless the Father draws (helkō) him.” The verb helkō means to draw or attract, not to drag by force. God’s drawing is persuasive, not coercive—like a lover calling, not a puppeteer pulling strings.

---

IV. The Extent of the Atonement: The Whole World or the Elect Only?

Calvinists cling tightly to the doctrine of Limited Atonement, teaching that Christ died only for the elect. Yet 1 John 2:2 declares:

“He is the propitiation (hilasmos) for our sins, and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world (holou tou kosmou).”

In Greek, holou is an emphatic adjective meaning “entire, complete, whole.” John could not have chosen a stronger word for inclusiveness. If “world” here means “elect,” then the text collapses into redundancy: He is the propitiation for the elect, and also for the elect.

That’s illogical. The grammar and historical usage of kosmos in Johannine literature consistently refer to humanity at large (John 3:16; 1 John 4:14).

So the analogy is clear: Christ’s atonement is like a medicine sufficient for all, but effective only for those who take it.

---

V. Conditional Security and Apostasy: Love That Respects Freedom

The Reformed Arminian does not teach that salvation is fragile or uncertain. We affirm with confidence that no one can snatch us from Christ’s hand (John 10:28). Yet, Scripture also warns believers against willful apostasy (Heb. 6:4–6; 10:26–29).

Does God’s warning contradict His love? No. It proves His love is relational, not robotic.

God’s grace keeps us, but never chains us. Love that cannot be rejected is not love—it’s control.

Like a faithful husband who will never initiate divorce, God remains committed; yet He will not imprison His bride against her will.

---

VI. The Harmony of Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility

Historico-grammatical hermeneutics teaches us that God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility are complementary truths that must be held in tension, not forced into contradiction.

In Acts 2:23, Peter says of Christ:

“This Man, delivered over by the predetermined plan (boulē) and foreknowledge (prognōsis) of God, you nailed to a cross.”

The divine plan and human freedom coexist in one sentence! God sovereignly ordained the event, yet humans were morally accountable.

If that’s true in the crucifixion—the heart of redemptive history—why would it not be true in our personal salvation?

Sovereignty doesn’t cancel free will; it establishes the context in which freedom can operate meaningfully. God’s decrees don’t dictate our choices; they define the framework where love can be freely given and freely received.

---

Conclusion: The God Who Invites, Not Manipulates

Calvinism portrays God’s love as powerful but selective. Reformed Arminianism presents God’s love as both powerful and universal—a love that reaches to all but saves those who believe.

In the end, the Reformed Arminian view is more faithful to the grammar of grace and the heart of God revealed in Scripture. It honors both divine sovereignty and human responsibility. It harmonizes the universal call of John 3:16 with the particular application of Ephesians 2:8–9.

So let’s end with a question that pierces the soul:

If grace were truly irresistible, why does God still plead, “Come to Me, all you who labor and are heavy laden”? (Matt. 11:28)

Because our God is not a manipulator—He is a Redeemer who calls, convicts, and woos the sinner to Himself.

He opens the door, but He won’t drag you through it.

That’s not a weakness. That’s love in its purest, most biblical form.

---

For more inquiries, contact us:

Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com

Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph

Phone: 09695143944