Pero teka lang. Na-curious ka na ba kung saan talaga galing ang librong ito? Vision ba talaga ‘to galing kay God… o compilation lang ng mga existing ideas at borrowed materials?
Let’s investigate.
Ang claim niya?
“While writing the manuscript of The Great Controversy, I was often conscious of the presence of the angels of God.”
Powerful, di ba? Sino bang hindi maniniwala kung mismong “angels” daw ang kasama mo habang nagsusulat? Pero may plot twist dito…
At guess what — just four days after Ellen White’s so-called “vision,” lumabas ang review ng librong ito sa Review and Herald magazine ni James White. Para mailabas iyon, ibig sabihin nabasa na nila ni Ellen ang libro before her vision ever happened.
Coincidence? Or convenient timing?
Ang review mismo (likely sinulat ni James White o Uriah Smith) ay nagsabi na maganda ang libro pero…
“We could wish the author had dwelt more on the law that reposes in that ark…”
Lo and behold — ilang buwan lang pagkatapos nito, lumabas ang Spiritual Gifts Vol. 1 ni Ellen White, may chapter na “God’s Law Immutable.” Exactly what the review “wished” for.
So parang ganito: nabasa nila ‘yung unang Great Controversy, nag-comment na may kulang, tapos biglang “nagka-vision” si Ellen White na puno ng eksaktong mga “kulang” daw.
In fact, Life Incidents ni James White (1868) at The Three Messages of Revelation ni J.N. Andrews (1860) ay naglalaman na ng mga parehong themes at phrases na makikita rin sa Great Controversy.
So paano naging “divine revelation” kung halos lahat ng laman nito ay pre-existing Adventist theology?
W.W. Prescott, one of her editors, said:
“If they did not find in her writings anything on certain chapters… they took other books, like Uriah Smith’s Daniel and Revelation, and used portions of them.”
So hindi pala “angels” ang tumulong sa kanya — kundi mga editors.
At si A.G. Daniells, General Conference President mismo, umamin na:
“We could never claim inspiration in the whole thought and make-up of the book…”
Kung mismong top church leaders na ang nagsasabi niyan — paano pa natin maipipilit na “heaven-inspired” ang librong ito?
“I have found no historical fact in her text that is not in their text [the historians she copied from].”
Ibig sabihin, kahit historical details ay hindi kanya — copy-paste lang from other historians, including their errors.
Hindi original, hindi inspired, at hindi prophetic. It’s simply a 19th-century Adventist remix of older religious literature — na ginamitan ng “vision” claim para maging authoritative.
The battle today isn’t about Sunday laws or papal conspiracies — it’s about who we trust for truth. The Bible alone, or a claimed prophet whose words were patched together by editors and borrowed from other authors?
Jesus said,
“Your word is truth.” (John 17:17)
At doon dapat umiikot ang ating pananampalataya. Hindi sa mga vision claims ng 19th century, kundi sa inspired Word of God na tunay na “breathed out by God” (2 Tim. 3:16).
Now that’s the real Great Controversy worth believing in.
References:1. Ellen White, Letter 56, 1911.
2. Unsigned book review published in the March 18, 1858, issue of the Review, vol. 11, #18.
3. Walter T. Rea, The White Lie, pp. 223-224.
4. Ellen White, Manuscript 23, 1890.
5. Donald McAdams, “Shifting View of Inspiration”, Spectrum, vol. 10 , No. 4, March. 1980.
Former Adventists Philippines
“Freed by the Gospel. Firm in the Word.”
For more inquiries, contact us:
Email: formeradventist.ph@gmail.com
Website: formeradventistph.blogspot.com
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/formeradventistph
No comments:
Post a Comment